Russian hack narrative revealed to be elaborate media hoax… email leaks actually came from Bernie Sanders insider


Image: Russian hack narrative revealed to be elaborate media hoax… email leaks actually came from Bernie Sanders insider

(NaturalNews) And now the total hoax of the left-wing delusional conspiracy theory begins to unravel. After days of witnessing the left-wing media hyperventilate over completely fabricated claims that “the Russians” hacked the DNC emails and turned them over to Wikileaks, it turns out the emails were actually leaked by a DNC insider who was angry about the orchestrated elimination of Bernie Sanders by Clinton operatives.

The UK Daily Mail is now reporting that Craig Murray, the former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, personally met the email leaker who handed him the emails files later released by Wikileaks. The email leaker, a Bernie Sanders insider, was reportedly motivated by “disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders,” reports the Daily Mail.

The hand-off took place in Washington D.C. in a wooded area near American University, Murray explained. Via the Daily Mail:

Murray insisted that the DNC and Podesta emails published by Wikileaks did not come from the Russians, and were given to the whistleblowing group by Americans who had authorized access to the information.

“Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,”  Murray said. “The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.”

“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians,” writes Murray on his website. “As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two. And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened. The continued ability of the mainstream media to claim the leaks lost Clinton the election because of ‘Russia’, while still never acknowledging the truths the leaks reveal, is Kafkaesque.”

Wikileaks’ Julian Assange also previously confirmed that the leaked DNC emails did not come from the Russians. The Washington Post, New York Times and other discredited propaganda mouthpieces of the regime continue to insinuate that the Russians somehow altered the election outcome to favor Donald Trump, but they haven’t produced a single shred of real evidence to back up their claims.

The goal is to create doubt in the minds of the electoral voters

Despite the complete lack of evidence, the entire left-wing media (propaganda pushers) in the United States has further abandoned any last semblance of journalistic integrity to keep broadcasting the knowingly false narrative that that the Russians hacked the DNC and released the emails to Wikileaks.

That delusional conspiracy theory is being pushed by a coordinated media campaign with the aim of spreading sufficient disinfo to cause electoral voters to change their votes on December 19th. The goal is to deny Donald Trump 270 electoral votes, and to accomplish that, the same left-wing media that incessantly lied about everything during the campaign is continuing to lie after Trump’s election victory.

If Donald Trump can be denied 270 electoral votes, the left-wing narrative will claim his presidency is “illegitimate” because he failed to reach the required 270. It’s all ridiculous, of course, since it is the disinformation of the media itself that is the cause behind electoral voters possibly altering their votes. Thus, the propaganda is self-reinforcing… and electoral voters are being subjected to the most intense political psyop ever observed in U.S. elections.

The leaked emails revealed astonishing depths of corruption and collusion across the DNC and Hillary campaign

By focusing the narrative on the Russians, the mainstream media has managed to completely distract nearly everyone from the substance of the emails that were leaked. Those emails contained damning details about extreme corruption and collusion inside the DNC, which actively plotted to use Bernie Sanders as a political puppet, then “stab him in the back” at the appropriate time to make way for Hillary Clinton. has published a list of 18 of the most astonishing revelations to come out of the leaked emails. There are hundreds more.

When Wikileaks began releasing the emails, one of the initial narratives of the coordinated left-wing media was to claim that the emails were “fake.” Thus, they are now in essence claiming that the Russians altered the outcome of the election by somehow hacking the DNC to acquire fake emails which were released by Wikileaks. It makes no sense, of course, but left-wing narratives don’t need to make any sense. They only need to sound emotionally charged and outrageous. (Liberals don’t think with logic. They make decisions based on emotions and social conformity. That’s why they can’t be reasoned with.)

WashPost, NYT and CNN all fabricated an elaborate hoax to try to steal the election after losing the vote

The Craig Murray revelations reveal the left-wing “Russian hack” conspiracy delusion to be a total hoax waged by the Washington Post, New York Times and CNN. Nothing they’ve claimed is true. Everything they’re writing about this is a fabrication or an echo chamber of some other source that’s also fabricating similar nonsense.

From the Daily Mail:

Murray said he was speaking out due to claims from intelligence officials that Wikileaks was given the documents by Russian hackers as part of an effort to help Donald Trump win the U.S. presidential election.

‘I don’t understand why the CIA would say the information came from Russian hackers when they must know that isn’t true,’ he said. ‘Regardless of whether the Russians hacked into the DNC, the documents Wikileaks published did not come from that.’


  • Avatar

    Mike, why do you keep calling the corporate, bank$ter, fascist, war pushing, Russian bashing media, “Left Wing” when, in fact, if they were traditional left wingers, they
    would have been pushing for Jill Stein to take the presidency or at the very least, would
    have crucified and exposed ultra hawk Clinton and her cabal (no “left wingers” on
    most mega issues) for her dirty tricks against Bernie Sanders who is far more to the left
    than pro-Monsanto, pro-fracking etc. Clinton ever was!!!

    The media is run by elite puppeteer$ who use dis-info, propaganda and divide and conquer terms like “left” and “right” to control the sheeple. You’re on the money regarding the media machine lying, distorting, censoring etc., but way off when you
    constantly and incorrectly label the media “left wing.”

  • Avatar

    Could be a deep conspiracy, a CIA operation, a Russian hacking…all are quite plausible. In this case, though, the simplest and most credible reasons for the leaks are likely the most truthful => that all of the Obama and Clinton cronyism was being successful in keeping Hilary’s bad acts and lies undercover, and that the only constant was all of their statements bloviating that nothing had been found to prove she was corrupt. My guess is that the leaks were done with the best interest of the country in mind, to bring the proof out into the public that was being hidden, squelched, overlooked, diminished, etc. by the corrupt people/ departments/agencies. While hacking or even scanning emails/ documents by any foreign or domestic govt entity is abhorrent, hers were govt work and were public record, and at least enough of the truth was brought to light in time for voters to incorporate that information into their voting decisions. Whether hacked or just leaked, I applauded Trump when he asked the Russians if they’d also found /had the other 33,000 deleted Hilary emails then please release them as well,

  • Avatar

    My guess as to ‘who done it’ was the CIA. Remember a little history in that the CIA set up and brought down governments and leaders for decades in the last century, if those leaders didn’t follow the ‘advice’ of the U.S. government. Then in the 1990’s
    the CIA director at that time decided that he wanted to be president. After
    all, didn’t he and his agency set up leaders in other countries and make them
    president? So the director of the CIA (George Bush SR) got himself elected as
    president, and there followed another President name Bill Clinton, who had been
    exceptionally ‘good friends’ with the CIA in providing assistance with the
    CIA’s heroin/drug smuggling into the USA. Do you remember the MENA incident?
    This helped to provide the means for funding to the CIA’s ‘off the books’
    finances through illegal drug sales. The CIA did not forget its friends.
    AMAZINGLY, after Bush SR, Bill Clinton managed to get elected as president. And
    after the Clinton years, AMAZINGLY, the former CIA director’s SON, Georgie JR got elected. Why is it so difficult for people to make the connection between the CIA and who gets to be president in this country? Remember, the CIA had experience for decades in setting up people in political office all around the world in various
    countries, and also in taking such leaders down (assassination or the ever
    famous ‘mysterious heart attack’) if those people did not comply with the
    CIA/America’s wishes. How much more difficult would it be for the CIA to put a
    person in power as president of the USA? Look through the history of
    the last 40 years and you might learn how easy it has been. If you want to look
    for the sources of any alleged ‘election hacks’, then you do not need to go any
    further than the CIA itself as the perpetrators, in my humble opinion.

  • Avatar

    I read this today on AOL( definitely a democratic company) and laughed my ass off. Such BS the media puts out.

  • Avatar

    so, you believe that Brietbart news is accurate? i’m not sure i want to take your vitamins. !!

  • Avatar

    I appreciate the revelation about Craig Murray being a source, but are you saying that the CIA is lying when they conclude that the Russians were hacking the DNC? The Russians have done similar things in the elections in other countries and the BREXIT vote, so isn’t it a stretch to call the CIA’s conclusion a “delusional conspiracy theory”?

    • Avatar

      The CIA only ever lies. It’s their stock in trade. It’s what they do, and they do it well. Why would anyone believe anything the CIA said about anything? Have you read much U.S. history?

      • Avatar

        The question is whether the Russians were involved. We may suspect the CIA is lying, but the evidence has not yet been examined and most is still secret. I’ll wait until the Senate Intelligence Committee gets the evidence out. What exactly did CrowdStrike see that pointed to Russians?

  • Avatar

    Oh, and another web of lies the DemonRats have spun…nothing new really – yawn.

  • Avatar

    Judge Andrew Napolitano is saying that he has sources inside the intelligence community that are saying that the general disgust over Hillary’s careless disregard for national security in her use of a private server (that had no real security) prompted one or more of them to LEAK (not hack – no HACKING EVER WENT ON) to Wikileaks in order to derail her campaign and to get back at her for putting US assets at risk. Sounds like a very reasonable conclusion. It is quite possible that multiple people leaked information for multiple reasons (Bernie folks, DNC folks, Intelligence folks). Hillary has been stabbing people in the back and walking all over them for her entire career. Plenty would want to see her finally fail.

  • Avatar

    I can’t wait for December 19th, so we can all watch Donald Trump WIN AGAIN!!!

    • Avatar

      Like Trump said many months ago…

      “We’re going to win so much, you’re going to be so sick and tired of winning, you’re going to come to me and go ‘Please, please, we can’t win anymore.’ You’ve heard this one. You’ll say ‘Please, Mr. President, we beg you sir, we don’t want to win anymore. It’s too much. It’s not fair to everybody else. And I’m going to say ‘I’m sorry, but we’re going to keep winning, winning, winning.”

      The more the liberals complain, the more they prove Trump correct. LMAO

  • Avatar


  • Avatar

    Very plausible this is the truth

  • Avatar

    The goal is to provide a pretext for Electors who have already decided to switch their votes. Everyone and their dog KNOWS that the hacking is a scam. This is about providing cover for faithless (corrupt/ blackmailed/ bribed) Electors.

  • Avatar

    The guilty parties are pointing and chanting “tattle tale” as if it’s the fault of those who caught them instead of their own. It doesn’t matter who tattled on the criminals, even if it did affect the election (it didn’t IMO).

    What matters is the crimes that were revealed. A massive investigation into child trafficking and corruption and everyone potentially involved should be happening by law enforcement/FBI right now.

  • Avatar

    He may be telling the truth, but if this was a claim the the Russians were helping Hilary then you’d be know doubt pointing out he’s very close to wikeaks who wouldn’t want you to know they got the information from Russia

  • Avatar

    This petition is simple.

    Electors are not some special class of people with special rights or privileges; they are AMERICAN CITIZENS just like the rest of us. They were chosen to represent us on December 19, 2016 by reading our votes into the record.

    Whereas; Forty electors have demanded a special intelligence briefing regarding alleged evidence that the Russians (or anyone else) may have influenced our 2016 elections.


    WE ALL have a right to hear the allegations at the same time.

    WE ALL have a right to examine any evidence that may or may not affect our elections.


    If it is not possible to present evidence and.or information to the entire citizenry, THEN NO CITIZEN has any right to special, closed-door briefings.

    • Avatar

      Also, they should hear counter arguments, not just orchestrated BS from the white house and Hillary. Let them hear from others who know the charges against Russia and Trump are completely bogus.

    • Avatar

      I put your link to the petition on G+. I suggest everyone do the same! I signed because I believe that we should all be able to hear that briefing since it is OUR votes that they are playing with!

      • Avatar

        From latest reports, it would appear that the intelligence agencies are NOT prepared to put forward any representation to attend the requested briefing. This ‘briefing’ isn’t going to happen.

        They got nothin’!

  • Avatar

    Demoncrats are nothing but liars and criminals!

2 thoughts on “Russian hack narrative revealed to be elaborate media hoax… email leaks actually came from Bernie Sanders insider

  1. Pingback: Want to Support the Trump Electors? DNC Leak Source: Angry Bernie Supporter, not Russia! Plus Aleppo Intel | Futurist Trendcast

  2. Pingback: The System’s Propaganda Machine Is, At Last, ‘Broken’ | OUR GREATER DESTINY

♥Thanks for sharing♥

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: