Protect your brain from toxic metals with silicon-enhanced water, especially after vaccination

Image: Protect your brain from toxic metals with silicon-enhanced water, especially after vaccination

(Natural News) Could silicon-enhanced mineral water be the key to protecting your brain from the neurotoxic effects of aluminum? Professor Chris Exley, from Keele University, believes that may just be the case.

Professor Exley and his team have been investigating how effective silicon-fortified water is at removing aluminum from the body for the last decade, and their results have been nothing short of promising. There are many reasons why one should be concerned about aluminum; the toxic metal is found in many aspects of our environment including food, beverages and vaccines.

As Exley explains, because aluminum is so widespread in our environment, the potential for the metal to accumulate in our bodies is very real, especially in the brain.

Cleansing the body of a toxic metal

Professor Exley also reports that their recent research on silicon-infused water has shown that it can be beneficial to Alzheimer’s disease patients. The team found that consuming the water for 12 weeks helped to reduce aluminum levels and improve cognitive function.

Through extensive research, Professor Exley and his cohorts have found that drinking just one liter of silicon-enhanced water per day can provide serious relief, and help to speed up the body’s excretion of aluminum. Their studies have shown that drinking the fortified water can help to dramatically reduce the amount of aluminum burdening the body in just a matter of weeks. Over a 12-week period, reductions in aluminum even reached up to a 70 percent decrease in one individual.

According to Exley, the form of silicon is very important; soluble silicon, or silicic acid, is what the team used to produce their results. This form of silicon is capable of bonding with the aluminum present in the body to form hydroxy aluminosilicate. Exley writes, “This form of aluminium can be easily filtered from the blood by the kidney. Hence, silicon-rich mineral waters increase the excretion of aluminium in the urine.”

Aluminum: a neurotoxin in vaccines?

A growing number of people are becoming aware of, and concerned about, the presence of aluminum salts in vaccines. These ingredients are commonly used as “adjuvants” which are intended to make the vaccine more “effective” by provoking a stronger immune system response. It’s essentially the immunological equivalent of poking a beehive with a stick.

The negative effects of aluminum used in vaccines have been hinted at for over 20 years. As reports:

In 1996, the American Academy of Pediatrics issued a position paper on Aluminum Toxicity in Infants and Children which stated in the first paragraph, “Aluminum is now being implicated as interfering with a variety of cellular and metabolic processes in the nervous system and in other tissues.”

Research has repeatedly demonstrated that the metal is capable of neurotoxic effects, and some studies have even shown that it can cause Alzheimer’s disease. Even the CDC’s Agency For Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) reports that some research has shown the negative neurological effects of aluminum in humans but contends that the metal’s relationship to Alzheimer’s disease is “uncertain.” It’s worth noting that the ATSDR page on aluminum does not include injection as a route of exposure to the metal either.

A 2009 paper authored by researchers from the University of British Columbia questions the safety of aluminum used in vaccines for adjuvant purposes. The researchers state that there is a growing body of evidence that indicates aluminum adjuvants can “induce serious immunological disorders in humans.” The research team states that the risks of aluminum include autoimmune disease, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological conditions.

In the abstract, the scientists declared, “In our opinion, the possibility that vaccine benefits may have been overrated and the risk of potential adverse effects underestimated, has not been rigorously evaluated in the medical and scientific community.”

In 2016, Professor Exley also published research indicative of the metal’s link to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology. In the study of more than 100 human brains, Exley discovered that those with the highest amounts of aluminum were those brains belonging to people who had died of familial AD. His research suggests that the genetic predisposition for AD is linked to the accumulation of aluminum in the brain.

While Exley does not believe that aluminum is the only factor in the onset of AD, he does believe that it plays an important role that should be considered more seriously. And perhaps, this silicon water might be a key to prevention.

Sources include:

Vaccination now scientifically linked to learning disabilities in children; vaccinated children show 520% increased risk compared to non-vaccinated

Image: Vaccination now scientifically linked to learning disabilities in children; vaccinated children show 520% increased risk compared to non-vaccinated

(Natural News) Recent research led by the well-known epidemiologist, Dr. Anthony Mawson, has led to many shocking revelations about the risks associated with vaccination. One of the most concerning findings of this study, as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. notes, is that vaccinated children are substantially more likely to develop a learning disability.

In their study of 666 children, the team found that those who had been vaccinated were a staggering 520 percent more likely to develop a learning disability than unvaccinated children. The researchers also found that vaccinated children were 420 percent more likely to develop autism or ADHD.

To make matters worse, the findings also revealed that not all vaccines provide the protection that they claim. While vaccinated children showed a lower incidence of chicken pox and pertussis compared to unvaccinated kids, the scientists found that there were no discernible differences in illness incidence when it came to other “vaccine-preventable” diseases. As RFK Jr writes, “[T]he scientists found no significant differences in rates of other vaccine-preventable illnesses like hepatitis A or B, measles, mumps, rubella, influenza, meningitis or rotavirus. The study suggests that fully vaccinated children may be trading the prevention of certain acute illnesses (chicken pox, pertussis) for more chronic illnesses and neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) like ADHD and Autism.”

Past research has also hinted at the connection between vaccines and learning disabilities and neurodevelopmental disorders. Back in 2008, researchers found that thimerosal-containing vaccines were a cause for concern in relationship to these conditions.  The team, which was comprised of scientists from The George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services’ Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, along with The Institute of Chronic Illnesses and The Genetic Centers of America, cautioned that thimerosal should be removed entirely from vaccines.

The researchers stated in the study’s abstract, “Exposures to Hg from TCVs [thimerosal-containing vaccines] were calculated by birth cohort for specific exposure windows from birth-7 months and birth-13 months of age. Poisson regression analysis was used to model the association between the prevalence of outcomes and Hg doses from TCVs. Consistent significantly increased rate ratios were observed for autism, autism spectrum disorders, tics, attention deficit disorder, and emotional disturbances with Hg exposure from TCVs.” The team went on to note that no such increases were observed in their control group. 

While the mainstream media purports the myth that vaccines no longer contain thimerosal, the truth is that many vaccines still contain this hazardous ingredient. Not only is it still used as a preservative in many flu shots, it may be present in “thimerosal-reduced vaccines,” and even some allegedly “thimerosal-free” vaccines, provided that the amount of thimerosal lies below the testing threshold, as per the FDA.

The FDA also states, “A vaccine containing 0.01% thimerosal as a preservative contains 50 micrograms of thimerosal per 0.5 mL dose or approximately 25 micrograms of mercury per 0.5 mL dose. For comparison, this is roughly the same amount of elemental mercury contained in a 3 ounce can of tuna fish.” By giving this comparison, the federal agency is trying to evoke a false sense of safety. But as anyone who is concerned about mercury may know, the amount of mercury in a can of tuna is far from being safe, particularly for children — most experts agree that young children are more susceptible to brain damage from mercury as their brains are still developing.

Health Canada reportedly recommends that children under the age of 5 eat no more than a half of can of tuna per week, and here the FDA is saying that injecting your child with two weeks’ worth of mercury in a single shot is just fine and dandy. While older children may be able to consume a can of tuna in a week, one might surmise that injecting a week’s worth of dietary mercury in one go is still not  a “best practice.” [Related: Learn more about the dangers of inoculation at]

Sources include:

Drug company created massive network of fake cancer patients to sell lucrative prescriptions while bribing doctors

Image: Drug company created massive network of fake cancer patients to sell lucrative prescriptions while bribing doctors

(Natural News) It often seems like the corruption of Big Pharma knows no bounds — and just when you think they can’t get anyworse, they go and prove you wrong. It recently came to light that in addition to bribing doctors and misleading insurance companies, a pharmaceutical company even went so far as to create a network of phony cancer patients for their drugs. It’s almost like a trifecta of corruption, isn’t it?

The company in question, Insys Therapeutics, is reportedly being sued for their wide-ranging misconduct. A federal indictment was presented by Senator Claire McCaskill, a Missouri Democrat, and a congressional investigation is still on-going. A new report made available by McCaskill’s office details just how far Insys went to push their sublingual, sprayable form of fentanyl, a drug called Subsys. As you may have heard, fentanyl is one of strongest and most deadly opioid drugs on the market. As Waking Times explains, Subsys has only been approved for patients suffering with what the FDA calls “breakthrough cancer pain.” To put it simply, Subsys is only approved for cancer patients. (Conventional cancer treatment is a whole other story, of course.)

One of Insys’s crimes is that they were allegedly creating fake cancer patients, so they could make it look like the demand for Subsys was much higher than it actually was. Further, a Subsys employee was caught misleading an insurance company to try get a prescription for the potentially deadly drug for a patient who did not actually have cancer. Another part of the pharma company’s ruse reportedly  included having employees pretend to be staff from doctors’ offices, in order to trick insurance companies into approving their drugs.

According to McCaskill’s report, Insys went so far as to block their out-going phone numbers, so calls couldn’t be traced back to the company. Further, this pharma company’s toxic scheme was so in-depth, “if an insurer needed a phone number for a return call, company employees ‘reportedly provided a 1-800 number manned by another Insys representative — instead of contact information for the prescribing physician.’”

If that doesn’t indicate at least a modicum of guilt, nothing does.

But it doesn’t just end with Insys’s network of dummy patients; that would be too easy, wouldn’t it? Insys is also in hot water for allegedly bribing doctors with lofty kickbacks for getting in on their dirty deeds.

One of the biggest finds by the Senator’s report, however, is an audio clip revolving around a woman from New Jersey named Sarah Fuller. Fuller did not have cancer, but was prescribed Subsys by her doctor anyways. She died last year, after overdosing on Subsys. During the call, the Insys employee states they are calling from a doctor’s office and did their best to suggest Fuller had cancer, without ever actually saying what she was diagnosed with. The Insys employee stated Fuller had “breakthrough pain,” but explicitly left out the word “cancer.”

“Profits over people” ought to be Big Pharm’a mantra, don’t you think?

Insys Therapeutics isn’t the only pharma company McCaskill has in her sights; Waking Timesreports that several other pharma companies will be scrutinized for their roles in encouraging the ongoing opioid epidemic. Opioid abuse is plaguing the country right now and the unscrupulous business practices of the pharmaceutical industry simply cannot be ignored any longer. Individual doctors will also face investigation for pushing Subsys when less addictive and less potent alternatives were readily available. While this may not be the end of the opioid epidemic and Big Pharma’s corruption, it certainly is a good start for shutting them down.

Sources for this article include: