Obama knew! Damning texts surface that name Barack Obama in corrupt exoneration of Hillary Clinton and her illegal email server

Image: Obama knew! Damning texts surface that name Barack Obama in corrupt exoneration of Hillary Clinton and her illegal email server

(Natural News) Damning new texts among deep state Obama regime operatives have surfaced, revealing that former president Barack Obama was fully aware of the FBI’s treasonous actions that exonerated Hillary Clinton of multiple felony crimes, despite the corrupt FBI possessing clear evidence of those crimes.

“FBI lovers” Peter Strzok and Lisa Page exchanged tens of thousands of messages that the discredited FBI tried to hide from present-day congressional investigators, but those messages were recovered and have been slowly leaked to the media. The latest leak reveals that Obama “wants to know everything” about the Hillary Clinton investigation, confirming that Strzok and Page — both likely facing serious criminal indictments related to treason — prepared to brief Obama on the details of their criminal operation to exonerate Hillary.

The bombshell story was broken by Fox News:

Newly revealed text messages between FBI paramours Peter Strzok and Lisa Page include an exchange about preparing talking points for then-FBI Director James Comey to give to President Obama, who wanted “to know everything we’re doing.”

The message, from Page to Strzok, was among thousands of texts between the lovers reviewed by Fox News. The pair both worked at one point for Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Page wrote to Strzok on Sept. 2, 2016, about prepping Comey because “potus wants to know everything we’re doing.” According to a newly released Senate report, this text raises questions about Obama’s personal involvement in the Clinton email investigation.

In texts previously revealed, Strzok and Page have shown their disdain for Republicans in general, as well as Trump, calling him a “f—ing idiot,” among other insults.

Among the newly disclosed texts, Strzok also calls Virginians who voted against then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s wife for a state Senate seat “ignorant hillbillys.” (sic)

See all the documents yourself at this Senate.gov link.

Obama lied to America, said he “guaranteed” he would not get involved in the FBI’s investigation of Hillary Clinton

To the surprise of no one who is fully informed of the criminality and treasonous actions of Barack Hussein Obama, the former president “guaranteed” he wouldn’t get involved in the FBI’s investigation of Hillary Clinton. We now know he lied, but this is routine for Obama, who constantly lied to the American public about almost everything that mattered.

Here’s exactly what Obama said in a 2016 interview, courtesy of Grabien news:

OBAMA: “I can guarantee. I can guarantee that not because I give Attorney General [Loretta] Lynch a directive, that is institutionally how we have always operated. I do not talk to the Attorney General about pending investigations. I do not talk to FBI directors about pending investigations. We have a strict line and always have maintained it. I guarantee it. I guarantee that there is no political influence in any investigation conducted by the Justice Department or the FBI, not just in this case but in any case. Period. Nobody gets treated differently when it comes to the Justice Department because nobody is above the law.”

WALLACE: “Even if she ends up as the Democratic nominee?”

OBAMA: “How many times do I have to say it, Chris? Guaranteed.”

“You know, this previous administration—the Obama administration—micromanaged everything out of the White House,” warned Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) in a Breitbart News Daily interview. He went on to add:

And I challenge people, remember the Syrian strikes that were actually handpicked and dictated by the president at that time. This gentleman was involved in everything. That’s where all this leads. When you look at the cover-up with the email scandal with Hillary Clinton, it gets—it should have pointed out exactly what we’ve been talking about, that this was the weaponization of our Justice Department not only to cover up for the previous administration and the wrongdoing and ills of them and those associated with them, but also to attack a sitting president—actually a candidate at the time, then president-elect and then a current, sitting president you know of an opposition party. This is outrageous, and you are exactly right we have got to get to the bottom of this so that people are held accountable because that is what America wants.

Now we know Obama was a liar and top FBI officials were committing treason

With the revelations found in these shocking texts, however, we now know that Obama lied to cover up his complicity in the FBI’s treasonous activities to alter the outcome of the election. As the UK Daily Mail reports:

An FBI lawyer wrote in a text to her lover in late 2016 that then-president Barack Obama wanted updates on the Hillary Clinton email investigation.
Two months before the presidential election, Lisa Page wrote to fellow FBI official Peter Strzok that she was working on a memo for then-FBI director James Comey because Obama ‘wants to know everything we’re doing.’

The September 2, 2016 text message was among more 50,000 texts the pair sent during a two-year extramarital affair.

Strzok was the lead investigator on the probe examining Clinton’s illicit use of a private email server to handle her official State Department messages while she was America’s top diplomat. He was later a member of special counsel Robert Mueller’s team investigating alleged links between Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and Russia.

Could Obama face criminal charges for his role in the FBI cover-up?

It’s unlikely that Obama could face criminal charges, because the actions of a sitting president enjoy significant constitutional protections. Hillary Clinton, however, is clearly facing multiple criminal indictments for obstruction of justice, destruction of evidence, violation of national security protocols, selling of influence (corruption) and more. Although the investigation may take 1-2 years, if evidence and the law are followed, Hillary Clinton will eventually end up indicted on multiple felony charges.

“The tide is turning and the real crooks are slowly being identified,” reports The Gateway Pundit. “Corrupt lovers Strzok and Page both worked at the FBI.  As a matter of fact, they were both very high up at the FBI and are both very corrupt.  Strzok is famous for his activities in protecting Hillary Clinton from criminal charges in 2016.”

Follow more news on the corruption and criminality of Hillary Clinton at Clinton.news.



Future U.S. Oil Production Will Collapse Just As Quickly As It Increased

Source: https://srsroccoreport.com/future-u-s-production-will-collapse-just-quickly-increased/

While U.S. oil production reached a new peak of 10.25 million barrels per day, the higher it goes, the more breathtaking will be the inevitable collapse.  Thus, as the mainstream media touts the glorious new record in U.S. production that has both surpassed its previous peak in 1970 and Saudi Arabia’s current oil production, it’s a bittersweet victory.

Why?  There are two critical reasons the current record level of U.S. oil production won’t last and is also, a house of cards.  First of all, oil production profiles tend to be somewhat symmetrical.  They rise and fall in the same manner.  While this doesn’t happen in every country or every oil field, we do see similar patterns.  For example, this similar trend is taking place in both Argentina and Norway:

Here we can see that oil production increased, peaked and declined in a similar pattern in both Argentina and Norway.  However, many countries had their domestic oil industries impacted by wars, geopolitical events, and or enhanced oil recovery techniques that have resulted in altered production profiles.  Regardless, the United States experienced a symmetrical oil production profile from 1930 to 2007:

As we can see in the chart, U.S. oil production from 1930 to 2007 increased and then declined in the same fashion.  On the other hand, the new Shale Oil Production trend is much different.  What took 23 years for U.S. oil production to double from 5 million barrels per day (mbd) in 1947 to a peak of nearly 10 mbd in 1970, was accomplished in less than a decade with the new shale oil industry. Total U.S. oil production doubled from 5 mbd in 2009 to over 10 mbd currently.

For those Americans or delusional individuals who believe the U.S. oil industry will be able to continue producing a record amount of oil for the next several decades, you have no idea about the financial carnage taking place in the U.S. shale oil industry.  This leads me to the second reason.  The U.S. Shale Industry hasn’t made any money producing oil since the industry took off in 2008.  And it’s even worse than that.  Not only have they not made any money, but they have also spent a lot of investor money (most that will never be returned) and added a massive amount of debt to their balance sheets.

According to the Financial Times article, In Charts: Has The US Shale Drilling Revolution Peaked?, they provided the following chart on the negative free cash flow in the U.S. Exploration and Production Industry:

Because the U.S. Shale Oil Industry was a Ponzi Scheme from day one, the shale oil companies had to design clever investor relations presentations to bamboozle, hoodwink, swindle and hornswoggle investors from their money.  And boy did it work.  Even though two-thirds of the U.S. shale energy companies are still losing money, investors continue to flood the energy sector with gobs of Dollars and Pennies from Heaven.  Without these much-needed funds, the U.S. Shale oil industry would go belly-up.

Now, there’s another downside to the U.S. Shale Oil Industry that I haven’t yet mentioned.  Because shale energy industry is producing a grade of oil that has a very high API gravity (very light oil), we have to export more and more of it as our refiners can’t use it all.  The notion that the U.S. decided to start export oil because we have become a leading oil producer is pure BOLLOCKS.  The real reason the U.S. Government allowed the exporting of oil in 2015 was that our refining industry couldn’t use it all…LOL.

If you have your thinking cap on, why would we have to export oil if we could use it ourselves??  Well, again… the answer is that we cannot use all of our “light tight” shale oil.  Here is a chart from one of the members of the PeakOilBarrel.com site:

According to the U.S. Energy Information Agency (EIA), the majority of growth in U.S. oil production is in the very light API gravity oils above 40.  Unfortunately, there is a glut of high API Gravity oils (light oil) in the United States and the world.  In the Petroleum Economist article, U.S. Tight Oil:  Too Light, Too Sweet, stated the following:

While the US runs on light products, with gasoline making up nearly 48% of the de­mand barrel, the rest of the world has a stron­ger taste for middle distillates. The global de­mand barrel is 36% middle distillates and only 32% gasoline. European and Eurasian mid­dle-distillate demand is an enormous 49.3% of the barrel, according to the latest BP Statistical Review. Middle-distillate demand is widely ex­pected to grow as worldwide trucking volumes increase and maritime fuels begin a major shift to marine gasoil from heavy fuel oil so they comply with new sulphur-emissions limits. Product consumption patterns outside the US argue for processing middle-gravity crudes such as Arab Light, Iranian Light and Russian Urals, rather than extra-light barrels such as 48°API gravity Eagle Ford.

The weighted average API gravity of EU crude imports in 2016 was 35.2°, according to Eurostat. Refinery inputs look similar: the current average API gravity of the crude entering American refin­eries is approximately 32.3°, nearly unchanged for the past 30 years despite the recent rise in light oil output. Worldwide investments into more complex, higher conversion refineries have eroded very light sweet oils’ long-prized light-distillate yield advantage.

As the article states, the rest of the world demands more middle distillate fuels that come from medium grade oil stock.  Furthermore, the weighted average API gravity of EU (European Union) crude oil imports in 2016 was 35.2°.  However, the majority of U.S. Shale oil API gravity is 40-50°+.

Thus, as the U.S. shale oil industry continues to produce more light oil, exports will likely increase.  And we already see this taking place.  The U.S. net oil imports have risen from 2 mbd in Oct 2017 to 4.4 mbd currently.  It is difficult to tell how much net oil imports will be over the next six months, but it is quite interesting to see the U.S. importing more oil even though we just hit a record of 10.25 mbd.

In conclusion, U.S. oil production in the future will collapse just as fast as it increased.  It is hard to forecast when U.S. oil production will finally peak for good because there is so much fraud, leverage, and debt propping up the system.  But, when the Greatest Financial Ponzi Scheme finally pops… I believe U.S. oil production will collapse much faster than we realize.

Assange: Upcoming new hearing after 5 years+ in Ecuadorian Embassy

Futurist Trendcast

The world’s most famous whistleblower, Julian Assange, spent over 2000 days or more than 5 years locked up inside the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. During this time he got a cool and now very famous cat, had plenty of celebrity visitors, and had a film (bad one) made about him — but what do you expect from Hollywood…

Assange has faced unprecedented pressure to surrender and be extradited for trial in the US, which, he maintains, cannot be just or fair.

After over 5 years of wait and struggle, on February 13 Julian Assange will finally find out whether a warrant for his arrest has been dropped, or not…


Introducing new 




EARLY BIRD SIGN UP OPEN (Feb 6 – Mar 1, 2018)!





View original post 21 more words

Windows 10 S becomes ‘S Mode’ for Pro and Home

Microsoft is reportedly planning to faded out Windows 10 S in favor of “S Mode” which will be available in Windows 10 Pro and Windows 10 Home.

Windows 10 S

Starting with Windows 10 version 1803 (Redstone 4), Microsoft will be changing its approach of “Windows 10 S.” Originally, Windows 10 S was a streamlined variant of Windows 10 Pro aimed for security, performance, and limited to the apps from the Microsoft Store. In the future, according to Thurrott, Microsoft will be removing “S,” and it’ll introduce “S Mode” for Windows 10 Pro as well as for Windows 10 Home and Enterprise.

Similar to the “S” variant, the new “S Mode” will be a locked down version of Windows 10 that runs modern apps from Store, but now, it’ll be like a feature more than a different version.

According to the report, Microsoft says that 60 percent of users usually remain on Windows 10 S, and those who switch, upgrade within the first day of setting up the device for the first time, and if they don’t switch in a week, then 83 percent stay on S.

 Clearly this data shows that there’s an interest among users on a more restricted version of Windows 10, which could explain Microsoft’s new strategy, and could also indicate that S Mode is likely to come enabled by default in new devices.

Windows 10 Home and Education will include the ability to upgrade from “S Mode” to “Home” for free, but those running Windows 10 Pro on S Mode, Microsoft will charge $49.

 It remains to be seen how Microsoft plans to execute the new approach to prevent confusion among consumers and hardware companies. Although, those running Windows 10 Home will have a way to switch for free, it may not be well received by consumers who will have to pay extra to switch on premium devices.

What do you think about Microsoft’s plans with Windows 10 on S Mode? Tell us in the comments.