Trump and Clinton spent $81M on US election Facebook ads, Russian agency $46K

Russian information troll farm the Internet Research Agency spent just 0.05 percent as much on Facebook ads as Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump’s campaigns combined in the run-up to the 2016 U.S. presidential election, yet still reached a massive audience. While there might have been other Russian disinformation groups, the IRA spent $46,000 on pre-election day Facebook ads compared to $81 million spent by Clinton and Trump together, discluding political action committees who could have spent even more than that on the campaigns’ behalf.

Facebook general counsel Colin Stretch revealed these figures today during the Senate Intelligence Committee’s hearing with Facebook, Twitter and Google about Russian election interference.

Without counting PACs, the top campaigns spent 1,760X more on election ads than one group of Russian meddlers puts the situation into context. The IRA ad buy was small by comparison. This aligns with Stretch’s main talking point that Russian propaganda content was a tiny fraction of the content and ads seen on Facebook. This revelation could put more focus on organically posted propaganda.

[Update: However, since the IRA was using incendiary, divisive, eye-drawing content about polarizing issues, it likely was able to squeeze more impressions and engagment out of each dollar of spend than Trump and Clinton’s ads driving awareness for the candidates That’s because Facebook’s ad auction system preferences engaging ads by providing lower rates. By focusing on hot-button issues and playing into people’s biases, the IRA’s ads got widely re-shared for free by viewers.]

Facebook today said that the Russians still reached 126 million Facebook users, as well as 20 million Instagram users. But Facebook, Twitter and Google all confirmed that their investigations have found no evidence that the Russians uploaded voter registration contact info in order to individually target voters with ads.

Facebook had previously announced that $100,000 was spent on Facebook ads from June 2015 to May 2017 by Russian-linked disinformation sources, while an additional $50,000 was spent by Russians that signals indicate weren’t or were only weakly connected to an organized disinformation campaign.

Are More Russian Trolls Still Out There?

Stretch says that the IRA was attacking the election as early as 2015. But one major issue is that there could still be other unidentified Russian groups that also tried to interfere with the 2016 election.

Stretch, Twitter general counsel Sean Edgett and Google’s general counsel Kent Walker all agreed that their investigations are ongoing, so they can’t be sure they’ve identified all active measures of disinformation implemented by the Russians. That’s in part why Congress asked the companies to retain all data relevant to their investigation beyond the 11 month requirement of media organizations that run election ads.

Facebook, Twitter and Google looked ill-prepared when asked if they’d calculated how much revenue they’d earned off of legitimate ads that ran beside Russian organic propaganda content. None could say how much they profited off distributing non-ad Russian election interference.

Throughout the hearing, there was little substantive talk of regulation for social media election ads beyond mentions of the Honest Ads Act that’s in the works. Most of the senators instead spent their time handing out reprimands for past failures, and bleating about how important the issue was rather than putting forward new solutions.

Senator Richard Burr closed the session asking the companies to prevent disruption of America’s future, abide by Federal Election Commission law, and that they should request anti-trust waivers if they need to further cooperate with each other. It will indeed require a joint effort and strategy sharing to defeat election interference, especially if Facebook, Google and Twitter want to avoid heavy-handed regulation.


Андрей Третьяков

Ложь и провокация 🙂 Кидайте пруфы.
Like · Reply · 14w
Евгений Логвиненко

Очевидно, что вы лишь притворяетесь русским. “Жи-ши-фи” пишутся через “с”! Так что “пруфс” в студию, пожалуйста!
Like · Reply · 1 · 14w
Андрей Третьяков

Евгений Логвиненко I am native Russian though 😀
Like · Reply · 14w
Todd Northrop · 

What a waste of time and money “investigating” this nonsense. Especially now that it’s clear that the loser in the campaign was the only one possibly colluding with the Russians. This entire Russia thing is nothing more than a way to try to make the losers in this election cycle obscure the fact that they lost and the ideas they disagree with won.
Like · Reply · 8 · 14w
Michael Schryver

Foreign expenditures to influence an election are illegal in the U.S. Try to dismiss it all you want, but it’s still illegal, Ivan.
Like · Reply · 3 · 14w
Todd Northrop · 

Michael Schryver I guess math and statistics aren’t your strongest areas, Shrek.
Like · Reply · 4 · 14w
Michael Schryver

Todd Northrop
Math and statistics are irrelevant to this issue. Illegal is illegal.
Like · Reply · 3 · 14w
Neil Jacobson

Interestingly, American candidates need to disclose their spending. Foreign agents attempting to illegally influence the outcome do not. Is there any reason to believe this reported figure as accurate?
Like · Reply · 14w · Edited
Wade Chapman · 

That’s the first article in my search to report accurate numbers.thats the numbers I heard yet nobody is reporting it.
Like · Reply · 11w

♥Thanks for sharing♥

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s