INVESTIGATION: “Trans” ideology pushed by Big Pharma and surgery companies backed by $400 million P.R. campaign

Image: INVESTIGATION: “Trans” ideology pushed by Big Pharma and surgery companies backed by $400 million P.R. campaign

(Natural News) Over the years, Natural Newshas drawn attention to certain environmental factors that are having a profound gender-bending effect on both human and animal life. But don’t for a second think that this onslaught is an unintended consequence of big industry; as new reports suggest, that this was all pre-planned as a way for Big Pharma to rake in more profits.

Much of it is tied into the push for acceptance and normalization of transgenderism, which New York-based feminist Jenifer Bilek admits is a conspiracy, of sorts, to funnel money towards certain special interests groups. Among these are drug companies that supply hormones and other chemical concoctions that aid the process of gender “conversion,” as well as surgery companies and other key players in the healthcare industry.

More than $400 million, she says, has been given by donors and business groups to promote the transgender agenda, which really gained traction during the latter years of the Obama regime. Pro-transgender funding isn’t often talked about, but it’s speaking volumes in the background, greasing the wheels of more profit flow for those also pushing more drugs and surgery for profit on the masses.

This is why questioning gender-trumps-biology dogma has almost become a prosecutable offense in politically-correct America, where stating facts about human nature is no longer accepted. It’s also why those in charge of the narrative are pushing so hard for anything-goes bathrooms, showers, and locker rooms, as normalization of such perversion is the key to ensuring that Big Pharma obtains the profits it so desperately craves.

“These men and others, including pharmaceutical companies and the U.S. government, are sending millions of dollars to LGBT causes,” Bilek writes, noting that many doctors, reporters, researchers, and surgeons are too afraid to stand against this evil agenda.

“Overall reported global spending on LGBT is now estimated at $424 million,” she adds. “From 2003-2013, reported funding for transgender issues increased more than eightfold, growing at threefold the increase of LGBTQ funding overall, which quadrupled from 2003 to 2012. This huge spike in funding happened at the same time transgenderism began gaining traction in American culture.”

Victims of transgender programming receive little, or none, of this money

What’s perhaps even more disturbing are the victims of this evil campaign who’ve succumbed to the programming and undergone surgeries or hormone therapies in a futile attempt to change their genders. The LGBT mafia loves to pretend as though it raises funds to help these people, but as Bilek reports, very little – if any – of this money ends up in a place where it helps LGBT victims.

Virtually all of it, she says, goes towards government agencies, technology think tanks, and pharmaceutical corporations that are pushing an agenda. And that agenda is to institutionalize and normalize transgenderism as a “lifestyle choice,” as Bilek puts it.

“They are shaping the narrative about transgenderism and normalizing it within the culture using their funding methods,” she points out.

“[Promoting] Bodily diversity appears to be the core issue, not [treating] gender dysphoria; that and unmooring people from their biology via language distortions, to normalize altering human biology. Institutionalizing transgender ideology does just this. This ideology is being promoted as a civil rights issue by wealthy, white men with enormous influence who stand to personally benefit from their political activities.”

This is important to keep in mind the next time somebody tries to tell you that transgenderism is normal, and that the mass “coming out” of people in recent years is just an organic outpouring of people believing they finally have the freedom to “be themselves.” In reality, these people have been brainwashed by a massive social engineering experiment that, likes most other things in life, is being driven by greed and Big Pharma money-lust.

Sources for this article include:

Breitbart.com

NaturalNews.com

This may be the dumbest thing that any politician could ever do…

Week before last, I told you about how the brand-new President of South Africa, Cyril Ramaphosa, made an impassioned speech calling for the confiscation of real estate from white land owners.

It was a pretty remarkable thing to say during what was literally his first week in office.

You’d think the new president would take the opportunity to address more immediate, more critical issues– for example, the fact that Cape Town is about to run out of water.

I’m serious.

Did you know? You can receive all our actionable articles straight to your email inbox… Click here to signup for our Notes from the Field newsletter.

Cape Town, the second largest city in South Africa (and the most well-developed on the African continent) is about to become the world’s first major city to run out of water.

The city is experiencing its worst drought in a century, one that has dragged on for more than three years. And its various dams and reservoirs are at historically low levels.

Local residents are already being rationed, including having their showers limited to two minutes.

But even with the rationing, Cape Town is still just weeks away from running out of water.

You’d think that would be at the top of the government’s list, given that their own idiotic policies caused this problem to begin with.

But no.

Social Justice has once again won the day over common sense. So they’re prioritizing the confiscation of white-owned land over critical water supply needs.

A few days ago, they took this a step further and actually passed a law authorizing the expropriation of land without compensation.

Their next move is to form an official committee to manage the process.

Now, South Africa obviously has a painful history regarding race.

And this issue of land ownership goes all the way back to the earliest European settlers who took land from the natives– something that President Ramaphosa called “original sin.”

The government’s objective is to correct this centuries-old injustice by taking land away from white owners and giving it back to its ‘original’ owners… ostensibly the descendants of native tribes.

But here’s where things become completely ridiculous. Let me give you a hypothetical example…

Let’s say a white landowner has a large property in eastern South Africa.

Even if he’s only owned the land for six months, he’s still going to be blamed for four centuries of imperialism… so his land will be confiscated by the government.

That sounds like a nice dose of justice!

But who will become the new owner?

One of the dominant tribes in eastern South Africa is the Zulu people. So perhaps the South African government will carve up the land and give tiny parcels to members of the Zulu tribe.

But then again… the Zulu tribe conquered that region centuries ago after a bloody war with the Ndwande tribe.

So perhaps the government should give the land to the descendants of the Ndwande instead.

Except that the Ndwande had conquered the area from the Mthethwa Empire, who in turn had conquered it from the Pedi tribe (of which Julius Malema, another of South Africa’s political hot-heads, is a member).

Even the most die-hard Social Justice Warrior whose heart soars at the prospect of confiscating land from white people has to acknowledge the absurdity of stealing property from the descendants of one conqueror and giving it to the descendants of another conqueror.

And, even if it were possible to accurately determine the ‘rightful’ owners of the land, and even if the prospect of forced redistribution were a good idea, can we really trust one of the most corrupt governments in the world to fairly and transparently execute the program?

Or is there just a teeny, tiny possibility that maybe, just maybe, all this confiscated land will end up being owned by government cronies?

Another important point is that a lot of this land that the government wants to confiscate probably has quite a bit of bank debt.

Imagine– you just bought a farm for, say, 50 million rand (that’s about USD $3 million). And in order to do so, you took out a hefty loan from a South African bank.

Now the government comes along and steals your property.

Are you seriously going to keep paying the loan?

Of course not.

This means that the banks are going to be stuck with massive defaults and bad debts, leading to a wave of bank failures.

So in their crusade to bring Social Justice to South Africa, the government is effectively engineering a banking crisis in their country.

This is criminally stupid behavior that puts South Africa on the same path that Zimbabwe followed in the late 1990s.

And as I told you a few weeks ago, when I first reported about this land confiscation in South Africa, anyone who is dumb enough to follow Zimbabwe’s economic model absolutely deserves what they’re going to get.

Russia on the Offensive! Gazprom Terminates Gas Contracts with Ukraine and Patriarch Kirill Reminds Bulgaria Who Liberated It

Brilliant strategic move by President Putin, shut off gas supplies to Ukr and let the EU think long and hard before they interfere with Russian affairs.

EU has no choice but to lie in the bed they made, they’ll have to carry Ukr and pick up the tab (stolen gas difference) if they want the heat kept on. That was very shortsighted of EU leaders not to anticipate the repercussion of gas disruption when they participated in initiating the colored revolution coup in 2014.

Now they literally have to pay the price, lol. 😉

Futurist Trendcast

GREAT BALANCER WEEKLY

Russia on the Offensive! Gazprom Terminates Gas Contracts with Ukraine and Patriarch Kirill Reminds Bulgaria who Liberated It

REMINDER! If you want to continue reading in-depth Lada Ray articles and unique analysis on FuturisTrendast, please take a moment to click on LIKE and support Lada Ray!

Gazprom

This has been in the wind for a week. I’ve been following this since day one. It is all the talk in Ukraine, blaming, as usual, everyone but themselves.

It started in the end of last year, when the Stockholm arbitrage took a normal for the West double-standard position and let Ukraine off leniently after Ukraine’s non-payment of debts to Gazprom for years. The arbitrage cited the ‘worsening of economic conditions in Ukraine’ as the reason for its biased decision, effectively telling Russia to pick up a billions of euros worth bill for Ukraine.

Last week Stockholm issued a new decision…

View original post 1,116 more words