VACCINE DEATH WAVE: UK government posts bid for AI system to process the expected flood of COVID-19 vaccine injuries and side effects described as a “direct threat to patient life”

Monday, November 16, 2020 by: Mike Adams

(Natural News) While the lying, treasonous mainstream media is telling us all that covid-19 vaccines are perfectly safe and “95% effective” — and this lie is being repeated by PJ Media, Breitbart and other so-called “conservative” news publishers — the UK government has posted a bid and an award contract notice, seeking an Artificial Intelligence (AI) system that can process the expected flood of covid-19 vaccine injuries and side effects.

Titled simply, “Supplies – 506291-2020” and found at this link on Tenders Electronic Daily, this contract award notice we originally posted on October 19th, 2020 and is summed up as follows:

The MHRA urgently seeks an Artificial Intelligence (AI) software tool to process the expected high volume of Covid-19 vaccine Adverse Drug Reaction (ADRs) and ensure that no details from the ADRs’ reaction text are missed.

The request for the AI system to process covid-19 vaccine reactions comes from the UK’s Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, the MHRA.

Further in the document, the MHRA describes an “extreme urgency under Regulation 32(2)(c) related to the release of a Covid-19 vaccine” and says that the expected flood of covid-19 vaccine adverse reactions will overwhelm its current “legacy systems.”

“If the MHRA does not implement the AI tool,” the MHRA explains, “it will be unable to process these ADRs effectively. This will hinder its ability to rapidly identify any potential safety issues with the Covid-19 vaccine and represents a direct threat to patient life and public health.”

The extreme urgency status of this bid is further explained:

Reasons of extreme urgency — the MHRA recognises that its planned procurement process for the SafetyConnect programme, including the AI tool, would not have concluded by vaccine launch. Leading to a inability to effectively monitor adverse reactions to a Covid-19 vaccine.

Events unforeseeable — the Covid-19 crisis is novel and developments in the search of a Covid-19 vaccine have not followed any predictable pattern so far.

Does this sound like an agency expecting the covid-19 vaccine to be safe and effective?

What’s clear from the description in the contract award document is that:

  1. The MHRA is expecting covid-19 vaccines to cause a surge of adverse events / side effects.
  2. The MHRA is fully aware that these adverse events will harm and kill many patients. They specifically warn of, “a direct threat to patient life.”
  3. The MHRA’s legacy systems are unable to handle the expected volume of incoming reports of covid-19 vaccine injuries, meaning the expected volume of such reports will be very large and unprecedented.
  4. The MHRA recognizes the “extreme urgency” of putting a new system in place to identify the adverse reactions of covid-19 vaccines.
  5. The MHRA states that if a new AI system is not urgently installed, it will be unable to identify many of the adverse reactions stemming from the covid-19 vaccine, and that this failure will negatively impact public health. (i.e. People will die.)

What this shows is the brutal honesty of the MHRA behind the scenes, in their contract bid process for AI systems. Yet publicly, nearly all government regulatory agencies around the world — including those in the UK and USA — share no such details with the public and falsely portray covid-19 vaccines are nearly 100% safe and effective.

We now know that even the UK’s MHRA realizes the covid-19 vaccines are going to be extremely dangerous to the public, generating a catastrophic wave of adverse reactions and deadly side effects.

It begs the question: Why isn’t the MHRA saying any of this publicly?

(h/t to the creator of the following video on, which first brought this bombshell to my attention.)

Culling the human population with deadly bioweapons and toxic vaccines: The “great reset” is medical tyranny and economic communism

No doubt the CDC knows all this too, and they’re aren’t broadcasting anything that would alert the public to this reality.

Obviously, the public is being deliberately kept in the dark about the dangers of covid-19 vaccines, and sadly, even pro-Trump, conservative media outlets in the USA are parroting vaccine industry propaganda to try to make people think covid-19 vaccines are going to save the world.

Keep in mind that the treasonous tech giants have all conspired over the last several years to censor anyone who questions the safety of efficacy of vaccines. This means that as people are dying from the covid-19 vaccine, no one will be allowed to talk about it or raise the alarm. All covid-19 vaccine deaths will be covered up and kept from the public. The media, of course, will do everything to protect Big Pharma, just like they worked overtime to project Joe Biden and the Biden Crime Family from shocking disclosures about communist China’s control over Hunter Biden.

In essence, Big Pharma and the globalist controllers expect humanity to line up, take the shot and die in silence as everything is stolen from us all by the evil globalist “great reset” collaborators. Vaccine shots that achieve their goal of mass genocide and depopulation are just one layer of their grand plan which also involves the coordinated, global theft of all private assets via an engineered fiat currency collapse that renders all currency-denominated savings and assets instantly worthless.

Not only will people who take the shots end up injured or killed; everything they once owned will be confiscated and stolen from them by the very same globalists pushing vaccines and censorship.

These are the same globalists who just stole the 2020 election in the USA, of course, by rigging Dominion voting machines and gaslighting the entire nation with their fake news media.

The final solution against humanity is a combination of a global economic reset, mass genocide via vaccines, engineered starvation via a controlled collapse of the food supply, and the total control over speech and thoughts via Big Tech censorship and social engineering schemes. To the globalists, you are nothing but a farm animal, and they believe it’s time to round up all the animals for slaughter.

Hence the need for the SARS-cov-2 coronavirus from the very start: It allowed globalists to unleash all their agendas to enslave humanity and destroy human freedom, all while claiming to be “protecting” you from the very same biological weapon they built and released in the first place.

If you want to survive what’s coming, download my two new audio books for free: The Global Reset Survival Guide is at and you can pick up Survival Nutrition (also free) at

Previous :New video shows PROOF that AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine is made with aborted human fetal tissue5,170VIEWS

Get ready for the “Work From Home” Tax

November 16, 2020
Sovereign Valley Farm, Chile

Once upon a time, long long ago in a dreamworld far far away, banks actually used to be capitalists.

They were wealth creators. They wanted to do business with their customers. They facilitated important trade and commerce. They acted responsibly and conservatively with other people’s money.

Now it’s a totally different story.

Banks seem to routinely steal from their customers. They gamble our savings away on ridiculous investment fads, treat us like criminal suspects, bury us in an absurd bureaucracy, and then charge us fees for the privilege of working with them.

And to add insult to injury, many banks seem to have become full-blown Marxists.

I started noticing this last year when a number of bank CEOs, along with heads of other major corporations like Apple and General Motors, declared that they would no longer make business decisions prioritizing what’s in the best interest of their companies’ shareholders.

Just a reminder– shareholders OWN the company. The CEO works for the company.

And yet these CEOs, who essentially work for their shareholders, have unilaterally decided that shareholders are no longer the priority.

This is a common theme in politics as well, with Bernie Sanders, AOC, and Joe Biden calling for an end to “shareholder capitalism.”

Don’t get me wrong– being a responsible corporate citizen, treating customers well, taking good care of employees, etc. are all obvious things that are beneficial for any business long-term, and hence beneficial for the shareholders.

The key issue behind this movement, however, is the belief that shareholders shouldn’t be able to call the shots any longer.

They believe the government gets a say who should / should not be on a corporate board. And the public (i.e. the Twitter mob) gets a say what a company should / should not do.

Everyone else gets to tell you what you’re allowed to do with your own private property, i.e. your shares in the company. It’s no longer up to you.

This is decidedly anti-capitalist; it’s effectively public ownership of what’s supposed to be private property. Yet banks seem perfectly willing to go along with this new ethos.

And now they have another feather in their cap:

Just a few days ago, Germany’s Deutsche Bank (one of the largest banks in the world) released a paper proposing that people who have the ‘privilege’ of working from home should have to pay a 5% tax to subsidize people who can’t.

This is a ‘work from home’ or ‘remote worker’ tax. The report claims that this tax has been needed for years, but “Covid has just made it obvious.”

So, regardless of your circumstances– even if you want to go back to the office but aren’t able to because your company sent everyone home– Deutsche Bank thinks you should have to pay up.

The report is even borderline insulting to remote workers, saying that they’re “contributing less to the infrastructure of the economy whilst still receiving its benefits.”

So apparently all of us working from home are just lazy, good-for-nothing bums in the eyes of Deutsche Bank.

This ‘research report’ seems more like something out of Communist student newspaper, not one of the world’s biggest financial institutions.

If these people feel guilty that their remote work arrangements are unjust, there’s nothing preventing them from giving their entire paychecks away.

But for whatever reason they feel entitled to demand a pound of flesh from everyone else’s paycheck too.

Yet this is the world we live in now– where even the banks have become Marxists and every idiot feels empowered to propose public policy.

And it’s also why TAX PLANNING must absolutely be part of your Plan B… which may soon become your Plan A.

This is absolutely the case if you live anywhere in the West: your taxes are going up. It’s already been happening in many cases at the local level.

In the Land of the Free, we’ve seen income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes, etc. increase across the country.

The People’s Republic of California has even proposed a wealth tax, plus an exit tax for people who flee the state.

And that’s before considering the impact of tax increases at the national level.

The incoming presidential administration in the US has already pledged to raise taxes, including corporate profits tax, individual income tax, and capital gains tax.

It doesn’t matter that the evidence strongly opposes these decisions.

For example– over the past several decades, the US federal government’s tax revenue has consistently been about 16% to 18% of GDP, year in, year out.

In other words, the government’s ‘slice’ of the economic pie is 16-18%.

During that period, tax rates have been all over the board, from as low as 28% (for the highest individual rate) to more than 90%.

And yet the government’s slice of the pie has remained nearly constant.

The lesson here is pretty obvious: no matter how high, or low, tax rates go, the size of the slice relative to the rest of the pie remains the same.

So rather than try to make your slice bigger, why not focus your efforts (and tax policy) on what might create the biggest pie? Duh.

But hey, why bother looking at data and history before making a decision…

Another example is about capital gains tax rates; the historical data show that raising capital gains rates actually REDUCES tax revenue.

You’d think they’d take a look at the mountain of evidence first. But no. They want to increase capital gains to as high as 40%, and that’s just at the federal level.

It’s not going to be much different in many other countries, especially Europe. Governments have all their Covid programs to pay for, so they need the money.

And now it’s clear that even the banks are on board, pushing for higher taxes.

So, again, tax planning absolutely needs to be part of your Plan B. And fast.

To your freedom,

Simon Black,

The election vote: the deeper you look, the worse it gets

by Jon Rappoport

In this article, I’m going to discuss two companies, Dominion, and ES&S. I would advise investigators not to go to sleep on ES&S.
I’m not going to repeat all charges that have been leveled at Dominion Voting Systems. But look at what happened in Texas, when the Secretary of State had an analysis done in the fall of 2019.
The report was titled, “Voting System Examination Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite 5.5-A.” It was prepared by James Sneeringer, Ph.D. Designee of the Attorney General of Texas.
The devil is in the details, so here they are:
“Adjudication results can be lost. In the [prior] January exam, during adjudication of the ballots in the test election, one of the Dominion representatives made a series of mistakes that caused the entire batch of adjudication results to be lost. We did not see this problem again during this exam, but the adjudication system is unchanged, so this vulnerability is still present. Recommendation: Certification [approval of the Dominion system] should be denied.”
“Installation is complex, error prone, and tedious. I counted 184 steps in their installation manual before deciding to estimate the remaining steps. I estimate a total of about 500 steps are required to install the software. I did not count steps that merely said something like ‘Click OK’ or ‘Click Next.’ This installation manual is 412 pages long with an additional 23 pages of front matter — contents, lists of figures, and the like…Recommendation: Certification should be denied.”
“Test Voting. During our voting test, we discovered that some party names and proposition text were not displayed, and one scanner was not accepting some ballots. These all turned out to be errors Dominion made in setting up the standard test election used by the Secretary of State. In the case of the scanner, it had accidently been configured not to accept machine-marked ballots. The other problems were caused by leaving some fields empty during election setup, something that the EMS software should not allow, or at least highlight. Recommendation: Certification should be denied.”
“Misleading Message. The ballot-marking devices incorrectly informed voters that they were casting their ballots, when in fact they were only printing them. The ballots are not be counted until they were scanned on a different device. Recommendation: Certification should be denied.”
“USB Port Vulnerability. The ICX ballot-marking device has an indicator light on top to show poll workers when the station is in use. That light is connected by a USB port. When Brian Mechler’s phone was attached to the USB port, the ICX scanned the files on his phone and did not complain, although Dominion later showed that the event was logged. When a USB drive with files was inserted, the ICX sometimes complained and sometimes did not, apparently according to the content of the USB drive and whether it was present when the ICX was first powered up or inserted later.”
The examiner’s final conclusion: “I cannot recommend certification. Computer systems should be designed to prevent or detect human error whenever possible and minimize the consequences of both human mistakes and equipment failure. Instead the Democracy Suite 5.5-A is fragile and error prone. In my opinion it should not be certified for use in Texas.”
If that doesn’t give pause for thought, nothing will.
Now we turn to ES&S, another voting machine company in use in the US. It has a long track record. The source here is a PROPUBLICA article, “The Market for Voting Machines Is Broken. This Company Has Thrived in It,” dated October 28, 2019, by Jessica Huseman. Key excerpts:
“In Georgia, where the race for governor had drawn national interest amid concerns about election integrity, ES&S-owned technology was in use when more than 150,000 voters inexplicably did not cast a vote for lieutenant governor. In part because the aged ES&S-managed machines did not produce paper backups, it wasn’t clear whether mechanical or human errors were to blame. Litigation surrounding the vote endures to this day.”
“In Indiana, ES&S’ systems were plagued by mishaps at the local level. In Johnson County, for instance, the company’s brand-new machines faltered in ways that made it difficult to know whether some people had voted more than once.”
“The vote in 2006 in Sarasota, Florida…There, ES&S machines lost around 18,000 votes; it is still unclear why. The loss was far more than the margin of victory, and a lawsuit followed that ultimately resolved little. The company said in a statement that a variety of testing done on its machines supports its claim that the devices were not at fault, but the county wound up canceling its dealings with the firm shortly afterward.”
“Despite such stumbles, ES&S — based in Omaha, Nebraska, and employing roughly 500 people — controls around 50% of the country’s election system market, the company says, meaning that some 70 million Americans vote using the company’s equipment.”
“A ProPublica examination of ES&S shows it has fought hard to keep its dominance in the face of repeated controversies. The company has a reputation among both its competitors and election officials for routinely going to court when it fails to win contracts or has them taken away, suing voting jurisdictions, rivals, advocates for greater election security and others.”
“ES&S files many such suits. In May 2016, for instance, ES&S unsuccessfully sued Colorado over its decision to buy statewide uniform voting equipment after the state moved to a vote-by-mail system. The company also sued Colorado county over the issue, and it lost these cases as well.”
“In Wisconsin, after the 2016 national elections, ES&S sued to prevent Jill Stein, a Green Party candidate for president, from obtaining information about its machines that might have assisted her in her bid for a recount. A judge rejected ES&S’ argument that submitting to Stein’s request would compromise its proprietary technology.”
“ES&S has also threatened lawsuits against voting rights activists. In 2018, it warned it would sue Audit USA — a small nonprofit that advocates for election security — for posting the company’s manuals for scanners online (it hasn’t done so). The same year, the company repeatedly said it would initiate litigation against security researchers who bought old ES&S machines and attempted to hack them at a conference on cybersecurity. The company also sent letters to its own customers, saying it would sue them if they participated in such conferences or provided ES&S equipment to the events.”
I’ll close for now with excerpts from an American Thinker article by Jay Valentine, “Big Data to the Rescue: The Electoral College Meets Data Pattern,” November 13, 2020:
“Here’s the summary: For the election returns in many precincts to happen the way they did, Biden would have to flip a coin 1,000 times and get heads every time. We aren’t done here.”
“He would also have to do it over and over again, in scores, perhaps hundreds of precincts.”
“Welcome to big data analysis.”
“Industrial fraud is always discovered with statistical analysis… Industrial fraud is pretty cool because from the outside, it is invisible…”
“When subject to statistical analysis against known patterns, industrial fraud stands out like a dinosaur walking through a field of peanut butter. It is unmistakable.”
“Is such analysis proof?”
“Yes, it is proof that there is an anomaly of such proportions that it must be investigated. And this isn’t hard. Remember, all the data you need to do the analysis is after-the-fact voting data. You do not need to see a single ballot.”
“…you just need to know that in precinct after precinct, there is an unmistakable pattern that the more people vote for Trump over Biden the greater the number of Trump votes the counting machines scoop from Trump to Biden.”
“The pattern [of vote-flipping] is one that can only be done by machines, like a computer. There are too many transactions, with too straight a line, across too many precincts, to be the guys with the ballot boxes arriving in the middle of the night. They are extra fraud.”

Sydney Powell: “Staggering” evidence of vote fraud, Dominion machines engineered by China, Venezuela, Cuba and DESIGNED to steal elections worldwide… release the Kraken!

Whether true or not, this is the narrative that Trump Republicans are spinning… look out below!

Saturday, November 14, 2020 by: Mike Adams

(Natural News) In a stunning interview on Fox Business, Sidney Powell explains why states that attempt to certify fraudulent election votes will be halted by the courts, even retroactively.

“President Trump won this election in a landslide,” she says, adding, “there needs to be a massive criminal investigation [about the fraud], and it’s going to affect millions of voters and elections.”

She also reveals the bombshell that Dominion Voting Systems was founded for the purpose of stealing votes in countries all around the world:

These are federal felonies. Altering a vote, or changing a ballot, is a federal felony. People need to come forward now and get on the right side of this issue and report the fraud they know existed in Dominion voting systems because that’s what it was created to do. It was its sole original purpose; it has been used all over the world to defy the will of people who wanted freedom.

Watch her full interview here, and read the complete transcript below:

Full transcript from Sidney Powell:

Well, I can hardly wait to put forth all the evidence we have collected on Dominion, starting with the fact that it was created to produce altered voting results in Venezuela for Hugo Chavez and then shipped internationally to manipulate votes for purchase in other countries — including this one. It was funded by money from Venezuela and Cuba, and China has a role in it also. So, if you wanna talk about foreign election interference, we certainly have it now. We have staggering statistical evidence. We have staggering testimony from witnesses, including one who was personally in briefings when all of this was discussed and planned, beginning with Hugo Chavez and how it was designed there, and then saw it happening in the country. As soon as the state shut down on election night and stopped counting, those are the states where the most egregious problems occurred. We also need to look at, and we’re beginning to collect evidence, on the financial interest of some of the governors and secretaries of state who actually bought into the Dominion systems, surprisingly enough — Hunter Biden-type graft to line their own pockets by getting voting machines in that would either make sure their election was successful or they got money for their family from it.

Well, for fraud this serious, I think even if the states are stupid enough to go ahead and certify the votes where we know the machines were operating and producing altered election results — if they’re stupid enough to do that — then they will be set aside by the fraud also. I mean, we’re talking about hundreds of thousands of votes. President Trump won this election in a landslide. It’s gonna be irrefutable, and we’re — patriots are coming forward all, every day, all day, faster than we can collect their information with the testimony they’re willing to give under oath about how their votes were stolen and how the machines operated. They were updated the night of the election, sometimes after the election. We’ve got statistical evidence that shows hundreds of thousands of votes being just put in and replicated. It’s gonna be — there needs to be a massive criminal investigation, and it’s going to affect millions of voters and elections.

Uh, I wish I knew I’m not on the inside, so I’m not privy to that information. I knew that even Democratic senators and congresspeople for years have reported problems with this system to the FBI and to the government, and nobody’s done a blooming thing about it. The people in the election security part of Department of Homeland Security need to be fired yesterday; they’re absolutely ridiculous. Chris Wray needs to be fired too because the only FBI interview of any witness was to intimidate him and try to get him to change his truthful testimony for hours by an anti-Trump FBI agent. They still have politics infecting the FBI instead of just following the law. We are on the precipice — this is essentially a new American Revolution and anybody who wants this country to remain free needs to step up right now. These are federal felonies. Altering a vote, or changing a ballot, is a federal felony. People need to come forward now and get on the right side of this issue and report the fraud they know existed in Dominion voting systems because that’s what it was created to do. It was its sole original purpose; it has been used all over the world to defy the will of people who wanted freedom.

Oh absolutely, and it’s a — it’s been organized and conducted with the help of Silicon Valley people, the Big Tech companies, the social media companies, and even the media companies, and I’m going to release the Kraken.

It is indeed a very foul mess. It is farther and wider and deeper than we ever thought, but we are going to go after it. And I am going to expose every one of them.

Also listen to this emergency update on the election status and likely outcomes, including the coming civil war after Trump is declared the victor:

Previous :BOMBSHELL: The 2020 election took place under a Trump-declared “National Emergency” that set an Election Day trap for the “unauthorized accessing of election and campaign infrastructure”

Next :Canadian government publishes bid request for “Programmable Hydraulic Guillotines” needed “in support of Canada’s response to COVID-19”

President Trump and Republicans have a card to play

By James Kirkpatrick

November 12, 2020 “Information Clearing House” – The Dem/ Main Stream Media Complex is infuriated that President Donald J. Trump will not concede the 2020 election. This is a Sign of Contradiction that he is doing the right thing. This does not yet mean that Trump won enough votes in key states, as Tucker Carlson has noted, but we also can’t say with confidence that Trump lost [Tucker Carlson Says There’s Not Enough Fraud to Change Election Resultsby Jacob Jarvis, Newsweek, November 10, 2020]. And here appears to be solid evidence that there was at least some wrongdoing—far more so than for the Russia Hoax that paralyzed Trump’s Administration for three years. The same neoconservatives who are demanding Trump concede would be insisting the U.S, invade another country to “bring democracy” if we saw its government behaving this way. Ultimately, the entire battle is about who is sovereign in this country—American citizens or the Dem/ MSM complex, including Big Tech oligarchs. They ensured it was not a “free and fair” election, and President Trump should never concede.

Let’s consider the almost hysterical fury from the MSM telling us that President Trump has a duty to admit defeat because Biden “won.”

And there are countless others.

In fact, of course President Trump isn’t doing anything illegal. No one has won or lost. Senate Mitch McConnell may be afraid to defy Trump because he doesn’t want to lose the two Senate seats in Georgia and thus, his status as Majority Leader. But he’s absolutely right when he says that the Electoral College determines the winner and, until that happens, “anyone who is running for office can exhaust concerns” [Mitch McConnell says Electoral College will determine 2020 electionby Lisa Mascaro, Fox6 Milwaukee, November 10, 2020]. The Supreme Court case Bush v. Gore that settled the 2000 election didn’t come to an end until December 12, 2000. Media outlets “declaring” the winner have no legal significance, especially when their projections seem to be based on polls that have proven to be inaccurate [Professional pollsters blew it again in 2020. Why? by Matthew Rozsa, Salon, November 4, 2020].

As of this writing, Arizona, Alaska, Pennsylvania, Georgia are all undecided. North Carolina was just called for Trump (and underwhelming Chamber of Commerce GOP senator Thom Tills managed to win a narrow victory over Democratic challenger Cal Cunningham [Cal Cunningham concedes to Thom Tills in North Carolina Senate raceby Evie Fordham, Fox News, November 10, 2020]). Joe Biden’s lead in Arizona is narrow and shrinking dangerously.

President Trump has a strong legal case in the key state of Pennsylvania, where it appears that the state Supreme Court simply created a new power to count votes that arrived after election day. The U.S. Supreme Court (without Amy Coney Barrett) deadlocked over this, but the Trump campaign will almost certainly take this case to SCOTUS again [Byron York’s Daily Memo: The election lawsuit Trump should win, by Byron York, Washington Examiner, November 10, 2020]. As Senator Ted Cruz has said, there has thus far not been a “comprehensive presentation of evidence” [Ted Cruz: Trump Election Fraud Allegations Will Be Resolved In Court, Not By Persuading You Or Meby Tim Hains, RealClearPolitics, November 10, 2020]. Republican leaders in Pennsylvania have already called for a recount “in any counties where state law was broken” [Senate Co-Sponsorship Memoranda, Pennsylvania State Senate, November 6, 2020].

However, there are more fundamental issues at stake. Thanks to the Sem/ MSM complex’s campaign of COVID-19 hysteria, the country engaged in a massive experiment with mail-in voting [Are We Sure About All Those Mail-in Ballotsby Josh Hammer, The American Mind, November 10, 2020]. Different state requirements add to the confusion. There have been specific claims of outright fraud, notably the inclusion of dead people on the voter rolls, reports that local officials gave voters instructions that would invalidate their ballots, and open theft of ballots [On Electoral Fraud in 2020by Pedro Gonzalez, American Greatness, November 9, 2020]. Critically, in several of the states where President Trump is launching legal challenges, the common factor is a company called Dominion Voting Systems. In one proven case, a “glitch” in its system awarded 6,000 votes to Joe Biden rather than President Trump [Republicans expand probe into Dominion Voting Systems after Michigan counting snafuby Zachary Halaschak and Emily Larsen, Washington Examiner, November 8, 2020]. One former Deputy Attorney General for Michigan says counters in Detroit outright provided fraudulent ballots to non-voters [Ex-Michigan Deputy Attorney General Alleges Detroit Counters Assigned Fraudulent Ballots To Non-Votersby Kyle Olson, Breitbart, November 9, 2020].

The truth or falsity of these claims must be shown in court. Of course, anti-Trump groups are trying to prevent any legal challenges by individually targeting the law firm that President Trump is using [Inside the Lincoln Project’s new campaign targeting Trump’s law firmby Greg Sargent, Washington Post, November 10, 2020]. No one seems to have considered that such a strategy ensures that most Trump supporters will—correctly—consider a Biden Administration utterly illegitimate.

Twitter and other social networking oligopolists are currently putting their thumb on the scale by censoring posts or by claiming there are “election integrity” issues with posts they dislike, even posts by President Trump himself [Tucker Carlson: Big Tech Took Part in ‘One of the Worst Forms of Election Tamperingby Mary Chastain, Legal Insurrection, November 10, 2020].

This control of information both before and after the election renders democracy pointless. If Tech oligarchs can control what the voters see and hear, we might as well put them in charge and dispense with Election Day altogether. It would be simpler and less time consuming than going through a farce where both the exchange of information before an election and tabulating of votes on Election Day itself are apparently too much for the world’s sole superpower.

If this is the way the system works, then, as President Trump has been claiming for years, it is “rigged” and illegitimate. If this is how it is going to be, whatever the Regime on the Potomac says in future should be considered as foreign to the Historic American Nation as governments based out of Brussels, Moscow, or Beijing.

Indeed, one can’t help but wonder whether the historic American nation would fare better under outright foreign occupation than a hostile elite which considers itself our rulers and treats us with open contempt, if not hatred.

President Trump and outraged Republicans do have a card to play even if all the legal challenges fail. State legislatures must certify a state’s electors before the College can vote for the next president. If state delegations believe the vote has been corrupted, they can send their own competing slate of electors [Donald Trump’s Stealthy Road to Victoryby Graham Allison, National Interest, November 6, 2020].

President Trump also has powers that he can use to change the political environment, especially by destroying hostile institutions and declassifying documents that the Deep State really doesn’t want to be made public [Reflections on the late electionby Curtis Yarvin, Gray Mirror, November 8, 2020].

If a rigged system is going to take President Trump down, he can take it down with him.

Arguably, if President Trump had the will to do something like that, he would not be in this mess. He did not bring Big Tech to heel. He did not ensure that the bureaucracy was filled with people loyal to him. He kept hiring people who were his enemies and then acted surprised when he was rewarded with treachery. He governed like a conventional Republican while talking like a nationalist, the worst of both worlds [The Tragedy of Trumpby Gregory Hood, American Renaissance, November 16, 2018].

Nonetheless, with his back to the wall, Trump can and should fight. Even now, he has a popular movement behind him—all he needs to do is lead them against the System that they thought they had defeated in 2016.

See also:

♪Maria Callas, La Traviata È strano! È strano!Ah, fors’è lui che l’anima

La Divina ❤

“E strano, e strano…Follie! follie…Sempre libera”.
La Traviata de G. Verdi.
Soprano: María Callas en el papel de Violeta.
Tenor: Francesco Albanesse en el papel de Alfredo.
Orchestra sinfonica di Torino della RAI.
Director: Gabriele Santini.
Maestro del coro Giulio Mogliotti.
Grabación en estudio del año 1953.
Torino, Rai Auditorium.

Aunque esta es una grabación de Maria Callas hecha en estudio, he incluido como escenario el Teatro alla Scala en una interpretación libre. Los flashes finales son también una recreación artística, sabiendo que en la Scala muy pocas veces se disparan flashes durante las representaciones o al final de estas. Nótese como disminuye la luz en el teatro al caer el telón y cómo este rebota casi naturalmente. También debería decir que hay notas (normalmente corcheas) que la soprano (formidable) alarga necesariamente aunque el autor de la partitura no escribiera calderones o blancas.

Grabación del audio hecha por Cetra en el año 1953. Siguientes ediciones:
FONIT CETRA CDC 2 1984; BELLAPHON 693-22-002 1990; FONIT CETRA CDO 9 1991; ANDROMEDA ANR 2504/05 1994;
ENTERPRISE LV1002/3 1995; WARNER FONIT 3984 29345-2 1999; HOMMAGE 7001842-HOM 1999; REGIS
RRC 2067 2003; NAXOS 8.110300-01 (transfered from LP: Ward Marston) 2005; WARNER FONIT 5050467-3377-5-6
(original cover edition) 2005; EMI 0946 3 95918 2 4 (70 CD set, Ian Jones) 2007; WARNER MUSIC ITALIA 2564 69877-2