One million COVID-19 vaccines sent to South Africa WILL NOT go into people’s arms

By ljdevon // 2021-02-09

South African health authorities cannot approve the AstraZeneca/Oxford COVID-19 vaccine in good conscience. The trial data was lacking conclusive evidence to justify the vaccine’s necessity. The vaccine offers minimal protection against mild and moderate infection caused by SARS-CoV-2, better known as the Fauci Virus. There is no guarantee that the protection lasts or whether the vaccine poses more risk to the individual after a comprehensive risk assessment is observed. The Serum Institute of India had already delivered one million doses of the new vaccine to the South African healthcare workers, but as of February 2021, these shots WILL NOT go into people’s arms because the vaccine has proven to be a useless fraud.

AstraZeneca vaccine turns out to be a fraud, as its necessity is called into question

“The AstraZeneca vaccine will remain with us … up until the scientists give us clear indications as to what we need to do,” said Health Minister Zweli Mkhize, who rejected the shot. The AstraZeneca/Oxford vaccine has been rejected in South Africa and around the world. Germany’s Standing Vaccination Commission found that the COVID-19 vaccine is only 8 percent effective for people over age 65. Switzerland dumped the vaccine due to lack of data on its safety and effectiveness. Swissmedic, Switzerland’s authority for medicines and medical devices, concluded that the available data “does not point to a positive decision regarding benefits and risks.” Other vaccine makers, such as Pfizer and Moderna, have relied on corrupt and flawed study designs on COVID-19 diagnosis to inflate their vaccine’s efficacy. This medical fraud has helped propel mRNA experimental injections past regulatory oversight, despite clinical trials showing that moderate and severe side effects are common with this new technology. The Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines store instructions in single-stranded RNA to command human cells to produce spike proteins, the infectious feature of the coronavirus. The Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine, on the other hand, encodes these cell-manipulating messages in double-stranded DNA and uses a modified version of a chimpanzee adenovirus to get the messages into the human cells.

Vaccines aren’t 100 percent safe and effective, and many aren’t even necessary

For years, health authorities around the world postulated that vaccines were 100 percent safe and effective, that the science was settled and undisputed. With the rollout of experimental COVID-19 inoculations, health authorities are being humbled and humiliated. Not only are vaccine makers committing fraud in the vaccine study designs, but the final product of COVID-19 vaccination is mired with critical errors that cost people their lives. Trying to showcase the vaccines to the public, health authorities have unintentionally broadcast to the public some of the most awful failures of vaccination. While most of these allergic reactions have been scrubbed from social media and omitted from mainstream media networks, the documented reality of vaccine injury is real, unrelenting and stoic — haunting a corrupt industry that has lied to the public for decades. For over thirty years, the Department of Health and Human Services has failed to perform safety studies every two years on the current vaccine schedule, violating their responsibility under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccination Injury Act. The COVID-19 experimental vaccines are receiving even less scientific scrutiny, as the U.S. FDA and other regulatory agencies around the world approve the inoculations for emergency use while indemnifying vaccine makers from legal accountability when their products harm individuals. The most concerning issue currently facing the world is the loss of human rights when it comes to making personal medical decisions. According to the UK, COVID-19 vaccinations offer no protection, but they are being considered mandatory for travel. If this coercion is accepted, then life-threatening vaccine injury could be forced upon people all around the world, and unnecessary and unscientific inoculations like the AstraZeneca/Oxford cocktail could be pushed into people, with no regard for human life.

Move over Bill Cosby. Here come the Covid Criminals

February 10, 2021
Bahia Beach, Puerto RicoEarlier this week, the right honorable politicians of the United Kingdom rolled out strict new Covid travel rules.
Bear in mind that the UK already has some of the strictest Covid rules in the world right now. People must stay at home and only go out if they have a “reasonable excuse”.
Anyone who attends a gathering of more than 15 people faces steep fines of 800 pounds (about USD $1,100), and anyone who organizes said gathering faces a fine of 10,000 pounds.
All ‘non-essential’ businesses are closed. And, just like incarcerated felons, Brits are allowed to exercise outside once per day.
Now, those rules have been in place already for the past few weeks. But on Monday, the government established harsh rules for travelers.
Effective immediately, anyone who arrives to the UK from the so-called “red list” of countries, (including all of South America, Panama, most of southern Africa, the United Arab Emirates, Portugal, etc.) must purchase a quarantine package that costs around $2,400 per person.
The rules require that travelers from the red list quarantine in government approved hotels (not at home), and the package includes accommodation, testing, etc.
As a further measure, the new rules also threaten fines and imprisonment of up to TEN YEARS if anyone is found lying about their travel history in order to avoid the quarantine package.
You read that correctly. Ten years in prison.
The British government, naturally, has defended the severity of these penalties, with the Health Secretary stating, “I make no apologies for the strength of these measures. . . People who flout these rules are putting us all at risk.”
This is typical, small-minded thinking of the scare class.
They believe that Covid is such a terrible scourge that no measure is too harsh, no liberty is off limits. And anyone who isn’t sufficiently terrified is a threat to public health and national security.
This is the same fanatical logic that caused the wholesale dismantling of our freedoms after 9/11. Terrorism was the terrible scourge twenty years ago, and, similarly, no measure was too harsh, and no liberty off limits, to protect us from it.
Reason has been completely abandoned. Even very prominent voices call anyone who disagrees with them a “murderer”.
In late December, for example, one outspoken British medical researcher told BBC Radio that people who don’t socially distance and wear masks “have blood on their hands.”
But what about all the people who have died or been severely injured BECAUSE of the Covid measures?
What about the dramatic increase in suicides, alcoholism, and domestic abuse?
What about the alarming rise in self-harm among children?
What about the untold numbers of people who don’t realize they have unchecked cancer growing inside of them, because they’ve been scared away from having routine mammograms, pap smears, colonoscopies, etc. that would have caught a malignant tumor early?
It seems to me that these Covid rulemakers… and the house cats who cheer them on… have blood on THEIR hands.
Not to mention– threatening someone with ten years in prison for lying about their travel history seems completely absurd, especially when compared to other sentencing guidelines.
It turns out, for example, that according to section 61(2)(a) of the Sexual Offences Act of 2003, administering drugs to someone in order to engage in unwanted sexual intercourse (e.g. Bill Cosby) can carry a lesser sentence than the new Covid rules.
In fact I’ve taken the liberty to provide a partial list of other crimes in the UK that carry an equal or lesser sentence than lying about your travel history:
– Sexual Assault: 10 years [Section 3(4)(b) of the Sexual Offences Act of 2003]
– Racially-motivated assault: 2 years [Section 29, Crime and Disorder Act of 1998]– Child Abduction: 7 years [Section 4, Child Abduction Act of 1984]– Sexual Activity with a Child: 5 years [Section 16, Sexual Offences Act of 2003]– Intent to injure her Majesty the Queen: 7 years [Section 3, Treason Act of 1842]– Possession of child pornography: 3 years [Section 66, Coroners and Justice Act of 2009]– Causing death by careless driving: 5 years [Section 20, Road Safety Act of 2006]So, in summary, rapists, traitors, violent white supremacists, murderers, and pedophiles, can receive lighter sentences for their crimes than someone who lies about having been to Portugal.
This is what constitutes good governance in 2021.
To your freedom…………………………
Simon Black,