Pfizer is threatening governments around the world and demanding RANSOM to protect against future vaccine injury lawsuits

Friday, February 26, 2021 by: Lance D Johnson

(Natural News) Before Pfizer’s experimental mRNA technology was globally approved as a “safe” vaccine for covid-19, the pharmaceutical juggernaut was already negotiating with governments around the world on how to deal with acute vaccine injury, vaccine-induced hospitalization and death, three inevitable and impending medical issues that would soon result from their cell-modifying experiment.

Pfizer has lobbied entire legislative bodies to indemnify vaccine makers from future vaccine injury lawsuits. In a contract with the government of Brazil, Pfizer made RANSOM demands, requiring Brazil to waive the sovereignty of its assets abroad to cover for Pfizer’s negligence. Pfizer demanded that Brazil create a guarantee fund and deposit that money in a foreign bank account to cover for all future vaccine injury liabilities. Brazil’s Health Ministry repudiated Pfizer’s demands and made them public on January 23, 2021. In the contract, Pfizer demanded that the laws of Brazil NOT be applied to Pfizer, to exempt the company from all civil liability.

Some countries have readily complied with Pfizer, granting the vaccine maker legal immunity from civil and criminal lawsuits when their experimental vaccine protocol harms human health and takes people’s lives. Other countries have taken a more judicial approach, rejecting Pfizer’s call for absolute indemnity.

Pfizer demands RANSOM from Argentina to cover for vaccine injury claims and wrongful death lawsuits

Pfizer’s ransom demands were even more berserk in Argentina. Pfizer demanded that the Government of Argentina foot the bill and compensate all future civil lawsuits when the vaccine injures people. Pfizer lobbied the Argentina Parliament to pass a law in October of 2020 to ensure their protection. When the parliament wrote that Pfizer needed to pay for future negligence, Pfizer rejected the deal. The parliament ultimately acquiesced to Pfizer and defined negligence to include only vaccine distribution and delivery. Pfizer rejected this offer, too, and demanded a new decree — one that would hold the government of Argentina hostage. Pfizer demanded that Argentina purchase an international insurance policy to cover for all future civil cases against Pfizer. When Argentina agreed, Pfizer made even more demands, requiring Argentina to put their sovereign assets up as collateral. Pfizer wanted Argentina to put their bank reserves, military bases, and embassy buildings up as collateral in the deal!

Pfizer understands what’s at stake. They recently paid out $2.3 billion, after participating in the largest healthcare fraud of the century – illegally promoting certain pharmaceutical products. Their latest mRNA technology, promoted as a “safe and efficacious” vaccine, is more of the same fraud and Pfizer’s top scientists know it. The co-founder of the new Pfizer’s vaccine, Dr Ugur Sahin, confirmed that the inoculation was created in a few hours on January 25, 2020. The technology is easily mass produced and was ready to be unleashed on the world in the summer of 2020.

Vaccine makers operate ABOVE THE LAW in the US

For thirty-four years, vaccine companies have operated ABOVE THE LAW in the United States. In the early 1980s, vaccine injury was prevalent and openly discussed, with children suffering injuries from vaccines that contained tetanus and pertussis toxoids and a highly reactive adjuvant.

By 1986, a majority in Congress were still convinced that the benefits of vaccination outweighed the risks of a potential infection, even with viable treatments at hand. In order to maintain vaccine supply and prevent the bankruptcy and criminal prosecution of vaccine companies, Congress passed the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.

This new law, signed by former President Ronald Reagan, granted vaccine companies immunity from prosecution when their products injured or killed people. As part of the tradeoff, the Department of Health and Human Services was required to study the safety of vaccines and improve vaccine science, with a report to Congress every two years; however, these studies DID NOT take place over the past thirty-four years, as confirmed by a revolutionary lawsuit filed by the Informed Consent Action (ICAN).

By turning a blind eye toward vaccine injury, Congress and the regulatory agencies gave vaccine companies an open door to push new vaccines into the arms of children and adults. If an individual is injured or dies from a vaccine, the vaccine maker is not liable; instead, the US federal government defends the vaccine in a special vaccine court that pays out damages only to select victims. Many cases are litigated for years before a settlement is reached, while countless other injuries are ignored. In the first three months of 2020, $57 million was paid out to families suffering from vaccine injury.

Vaccine makers’ legal immunity helped create the CDC’s ever-expanding vaccine schedule which quickly made future generations vaccine-dependent, inundating children with upwards of 56 vaccine doses by the turn of the century. Today, vaccine companies lobby state government officials to take away any personal exemptions to vaccination, bullying parents to comply with a long list of vaccines in order to enroll their children in a public school. Now vaccine makers are working with the airline industry, concert venues and entire governments to enforce a Vaccine Passport on everyone. The coercion, force, fraud and criminal demands of vaccine companies is one of the greatest threats to health, liberty and human rights in the 21st century.

Sources include:

Previous :Hospitals in France forced to SLOW DOWN covid vaccinations as healthcare workers fall ill in droves

China “Accidentally” uses Anal Swab tests on US Diplomats

February 26, 2021
Dallas, Texas, USAAre you ready for this week’s absurdity? Here’s our Friday roll-up of the most ridiculous stories from around the world that are threats to your liberty, risks to your prosperity… and on occasion, inspiring poetic justice.China “Accidentally” uses Covid anal swab tests on US DiplomatsIn January we mentioned that China began using anal swab Covid tests on school children, claiming they were more accurate than the nasal swab method.China also requires the intrusive (by about 2-3 inches) tests on certain travelers coming into the country.Recently, a group of US diplomats and their family members reported that they were subjected to the anal swabs.In response, China at first claimed that the tests were given in error. But later they backtracked and denied that they had ever required anal swabs for US diplomats.But the diplomats aren’t dropping the issue, and they’ve appealed to the US State Department— which has already said it is committed to preserving the “dignity” of US diplomats and their families.Wonderful! So we can all agree that the test is totally undignified. But if that’s the case, why is “dignity” only reserved for government officials?Sounds like this is another case of rules for thee, and not for me.Click here to read the full story.Coca-Cola Trains Employees to “Be Less White”Coca-Cola decided it’s employees needed some reeducation on diversity and inclusion, so the company required employees to take a Linked-In course on the subject.Part of that course involved a lesson from the author of White Fragility, called “Confronting Racism.” It instructed employees to be “less white, less arrogant, less certain, less defensive, less ignorant, and more humble.”Coca-Cola said that this particular lesson was not part of its required course, it simply appeared on the same Linked-In module on diversity training. Employees dispute this claim.Regardless, this was a course that plenty of companies apparently thought was entirely appropriate to push on employees in the workplace.Linked-In is removing the “Confronting Racism” course from its diversity curriculum after the backlash.Click here to read the full story.Muppet Show hit with offensive content warningDisney recently began adding offensive content labels to certain old shows and movies available on its online streaming platforms.Disney decided that instead of completely censoring content, it would instead warn viewers in advance.Now that offensive content warning has been placed on The Muppet Show.Apparently the classic children’s show featuring puppets like Kermit the Frog and Miss Piggy “includes negative depictions and/or mistreatment of people or cultures.”As Disney explains, “Rather than remove this content, we want to acknowledge its harmful impact, learn from it and spark conversation to create a more inclusive future together.”The warning does not specify exactly what is offensive about the Muppets, so we are left to guess.Click here to read the full story.“Being offensive is an offence” UK police tell communityPolice in the UK recently unveiled a billboard that read , “Being offensive is an offence,” as part of a campaign to encourage more people to report hate crimes.After a backlash, police clarified that, no, technically just being offensive isn’t illegal.But in reality, the definition of a hate crime is so loose, that it includes, “verbal and written online abuse.”That’s probably why there were over 105,000 “hate crimes” in England and Wales last year.Click here to read the full story.Man offered Covid vaccine because doctors thought he was 6 cm tallAn apparently healthy British man was confused when the UK’s socialized healthcare system offered him a priority Covid vaccine meant for sick people.Turns out, doctors had his height listed as 6cm, which gave him a body mass index of 28,000 (40 is considered morbidly obese). Apparently no one thought that was strange.But, sure, we should probably give the government bureaucracy more control over our healthcare.Click here to read the full story.Joe Biden: China’s genocide against its own people just “different norms”For more than five years, the Chinese Communist Party has imprisoned more than 1 million people in internment camps. Their crime? Being born in China as a member of the minority Uighur ethnic group.The aim of Chinese President Xi Jinping (aka Winnie the Pooh) is to reeducate these heinous criminals until he can be sure of their loyalty to China’s national ideology.Anyone with more than two braincells can see that this is active, evil oppression. Yet even the wokest of the woke out there turn a blind eye.In the credits of its recent live action film Mulan, for example, Disney thanked the Chinese government for all of its wonderful support, despite having filmed the movie in the same province as the Uighur prison camps.
So… according to Disney’s woke logic, Muppets = bad, but Chinese ethnocide = good.More alarmingly, in a CNN town hall meeting last week, President Biden was asked if he brought the issue up in a recent conversation he had with Winnie the Pooh.While initially he made some vague comment that “we must speak up for human rights,” he then went on to justify China’s oppression as an attempt to become “unified at home”.He continued, saying “I’m not going to speak out against what he’s doing in Hong Kong, what he’s doing with the Uighers. . . culturally there are different norms that each country and their leaders are expected to follow.”An astonished Anderson Cooper asked the question again to Joe Biden, asking him to clarify his comments, upon which Biden deflected, stating merely that it’s a complicated issue and he shouldn’t try to explain it.Click here to watch the video.
To your freedom,
Simon Black,

SARS Variants, Spike Proteins and More All Rest on 1 Big Fat Assumption

Published 7 hours ago on February 25, 2021By Makia Freeman


  • THE STORY:As the WHO, CDC and Governments ramp up COVID fear with new scary stories of SARS variants, let’s get back to the basics: there still has never been true virus isolation.
  • THE IMPLICATIONS:No matter how much the MSM tries to convince you, those propagating the COVID narrative cannot overcome the entirely fraudulent foundation of the scamdemic. There is no virus.
Above: what has never happened and seemingly never will: true virus isolation. SARS variants, spike proteins and more all rest on 1 big fat assumption: that SARS-CoV-2 exists. But we are still without proof of that.

Without virus isolation, the SARS variants

brainwashing theme is being increasingly pushed by the NWO (New World Order) social engineers to prop up the pandemic. With more people becoming aware that there is no emergency and there is no pandemic, the COVID manipulators are propagating more lies by inventing SARS variants and using them as fuel to continue the scamdemic. Apparently, there are now South African, UK and Californian variants of which you need to be very afraid. However, whether it’s new variants, spike proteins or other SARS-CoV-2 paraphernalia, all of these stories depend on a basic assumption: that a new virus SARS-CoV-2 exists. You can’t have variants of a virus that doesn’t exist. You can’t have spike proteins on a virus that doesn’t exist. Likewise, you can’t make a true traditional vaccine (not the gene editing devices of Pfizer and Moderna) of a virus that doesn’t exist. So we keep coming back to the same point: SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated or purified, and thus so much of the current reporting about it is disinformation that cannot be true.

One Big, Fat, Unfounded Assumption

As always, Dr. Tom Cowan and Dr. Andrew Kaufman (whom I have quoted extensively in previous articles such as this one and this one) shine light on the true state of affairs. According to them, no true isolation of a virus has EVER happened, either for SARS-CoV-2 or other viruses like HIV. In a recent discussion, they talk about the lack of scientific evidence for the proof of viruses alleged to cause disease in the context of a recently aired debate between Dr. Judy Mikovits and Kaufman. The discussion became a little tense as Kaufman prodded Mikovits to explain how she had ever isolated a virus (as she claims to have repeatedely done), when all she had done was show viruses budding out of the cell (not true isolation). Mikovits replied it had to be that way for retroviruses, because the human body would eat up loose RNA or DNA. Mikovits did however agree and explicitly state that SARS-CoV-2 had never been isolated.

Cowan makes the following point around the 16-minute mark about virus isolation:

“If they [viruses] are not isolated … they don’t exist as independent entities. These is simply no way they can cause disease, there’s no way we can characterize them, there’s no way we can take a segment and say ‘that’s unique to this’, so there’s no way we can do a PCR test.”

Kaufman brings up an interesting jaguar analogy around the 26-minute mark. Imagine a European explorer had heard of new wild cats/leopards in the South American jungle, and set out to find one. Since they are stealthy predators, he could not find one, but instead found some teeth. Would that count as proof of a new wild cat (a jaguar)? A scientist claiming discovery a new virus, amidst all the millions of tiny particles that swim around in our cells and bloodstream, is like a European explorer visiting South America for the first time and claiming he found a jaguar just because he found the tooth of a wild cat, despite not having found the skeleton or body of it. Why does a tiny piece of RNA count as proof of an alleged novel virus SARS-CoV-2?

Statement On Virus Isolation (SOVI)

Cowan, Kaufman and Sally Fallon Morell have together written a short document entitled Statement On Virus Isolation (SOVI) where they definitively explain that, according to “common sense, the laws of logic and the dictates of science,” the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been isolated or purified. The word isolation is often defined differently by virologists trying to justify their methods (adding it to other media like milk and bovine serum, plus mixing it with chemicals like antibiotics). The SOVI statement includes the Oxford definition of the word isolation: “the action of isolating; the fact or condition of being isolated or standing alone; separation from other things or persons; solitariness.” Therefore, logically, these points follow:

  • the structure and composition of something not shown to exist can’t be known, including the presence, structure, and function of any hypothetical spike or other proteins;
  • the genetic sequence of something that has never been found can’t be known;
  • “variants” of something that hasn’t been shown to exist can’t be known;
  • it’s impossible to demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called Covid-19.

The writers then outline how a person would isolate the virus if they were being scientifically rigorous and careful:

In as concise terms as possible, here’s the proper way to isolate, characterize and demonstrate a new virus. First, one takes samples (blood, sputum, secretions) from many people (e.g. 500) with symptoms which are unique and specific enough to characterize an illness. Without mixing these samples with ANY tissue or products that also contain genetic material, the virologist macerates, filters and ultracentrifuges i.e. purifies the specimen. This common virology technique, done for decades to isolate bacteriophages and so-called giant viruses in every virology lab, then allows the virologist to demonstrate with electron microscopy thousands of identically sized and shaped particles. These particles are the isolated and purified virus.

These identical particles are then checked for uniformity by physical and/or microscopic techniques. Once the purity is determined, the particles may be further characterized. This would include examining the structure, morphology, and chemical composition of the particles. Next, their genetic makeup is characterized by extracting the genetic material directly from the purified particles and using genetic-sequencing techniques, such as Sanger sequencing, that have also been around for decades. Then one does an analysis to confirm that these uniform particles are exogenous (outside) in origin as a virus is conceptualized to be, and not the normal breakdown products of dead and dying tissues. (As of May 2020, we know that virologists have no way to determine whether the particles they’re seeing are viruses or just normal break-down products of dead and dying tissues.)”

That is how it would be done to ensure proper virus isolation. However what has happened since the outbreak of the COVID scamdemic is scientific fraud over and over and over again:

“Instead, since 1954, virologists have taken unpurified samples from a relatively few people, often less than ten, with a similar disease. They then minimally process this sample and inoculate this unpurified sample onto tissue culture containing usually four to six other types of material — all of which contain identical genetic material as to what is called a “virus.” The tissue culture is starved and poisoned and naturally disintegrates into many types of particles, some of which contain genetic material. Against all common sense, logic, use of the English language and scientific integrity, this process is called “virus isolation.” This brew containing fragments of genetic material from many sources is then subjected to genetic analysis, which then creates in a computer-simulation process the alleged sequence of the alleged virus, a so called in silico genome. At no time is an actual virus confirmed by electron microscopy. At no time is a genome extracted and sequenced from an actual virus. This is scientific fraud.

The observation that the unpurified specimen — inoculated onto tissue culture along with toxic antibiotics, bovine fetal tissue, amniotic fluid and other tissues — destroys the kidney tissue onto which it is inoculated is given as evidence of the virus’ existence and pathogenicity. This is scientific fraud.”

Mainstream Virology Claims True Virus Isolation is Impossible

Let’s return to what Mikovits said, and what many mainstream virologists say: we can’t isolate viruses from their host cell because there’s not enough of them, they’re too small or they would immediately die if we did so (and therefore must be found within the host cell). So mainstream virology redefines what isolation means when it comes to viruses. Cowan has countered this point repeatedly:

“From now on, when anyone gives you a paper that suggests the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated, please check the methods sections. If the researchers used Vero cells or any other culture method, you know that their process was not isolation. You will hear the following excuses for why actual isolation isn’t done:

  1. There were not enough virus particles found in samples from patients to analyze.
  2. Viruses are intracellular parasites; they can’t be found outside the cell in this manner.

If No. 1 is correct, and we can’t find the virus in the sputum of sick people, then on what evidence do we think the virus is dangerous or even lethal? If No. 2 is correct, then how is the virus spread from person to person? We are told it emerges from the cell to infect others. Then why isn’t it possible to find it?”

Imaginary SARS-CoV-2 Variants and Spike Protein Changes

Predictably, both the WHO and the CDC are pushing the idea that imaginary variants of an imaginary virus are breaking out worldwide. They are even giving these so-called variants technical names: the supposed UK variant is called B.1.1.7, the supposed Brazil variant is called P.1 and the supposed California variant is B.1.427 and B.1.429 (aka CAL.20C/L452R). The supposed South African variant is B.1.351 or 501Y.V2, allegedly due to its N501Y mutation. N501Y is scientific shorthand for the substitution of one protein building block (amino acid) for another at position 501 in the part of the virus called the spike protein. Speaking of spike protein, we all have all been told since the start of this fake pandemic that this is what made the SARS-CoV-2 virus so deadly, but remember: the spike protein is part of the digital, in silico, computer database genome of the virus. They could have made up anything. There is no proof of a real virus with a real spike protein. It’s more technical gobbledygook to give the virus the appearance of existence and reality when it DOES NOT EXIST.

Once this concept is fully grasped, the implications are quite astounding. Even people who have done a great job speaking out against the COVID scamdemic – people like Dr. James Lyons-Weiler and Dr. Judy Mikovits (who deserve kudos for their courage) – are basing their conclusions on the idea that the virus has been isolated and purified when it simply has not. Lyons-Weiler has written scientific papers on the idea of pathogenic priming but that idea is based on the premise of an existing virus whose genome has been actually sequenced from a real life specimen, as opposed to a computer-generated theoretical sequence.

The Vaccine Can’t Possibly Work, Because It’s Based on an In Silico, Theoretical Virus

Vaccines are dangerous inventions, but even if you are pro-vax, the COVID vaccines can’t possibly work (the traditional ones not the mRNA ones) because the Big Pharma manufacturers never had a real viral specimen to use to develop them. They are using a theoretical virus as their starting point. This makes all the COVID vaccines even less desirable, and lowers their benefit-to-risk ratio to 0.


It is a famous maxim of life that you can know the tree by its fruits. Thus, if the root of a tree is poisoned, so shall be its fruit. The foundational structure of the entire COVID narrative is not just shaky but indefensible scientific fraud. Without virus isolation, the additional permutations of the COVID narratives are just more stories of no substance. By now, many people have awoken to the truth that there is not one virus, not one disease called COVID (which is essentially just reclassification of existing disease) and not one cause of that disease. Why would we assume that a deadly “virus” is the only cause of disease – not poor hygiene, poor sanitation, toxic elements, pollution, EMFs (5G), pesticides, synthetic chemicals, stress, emotional imbalance, lack of adequate exercise and deficiency of vital nutrients like vitamins B, C or D? We must keep attacking the entire narrative at its base in order to uncover the truth.


Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles, author of the book Cancer: The Lies, the Truth and the Solutions and senior researcher at Makia is on Steemit and Parler.













Reblog: IT’S HERE! WEBINAR 17: 100-YEAR PLAN ​& FUTURE EXPANSION OF CHINA is now available! (Info & Links!)

Reblog interesting post from Futuristrendcast with Lada Ray:


I am so pleased to tell you that the new 

Earth Shift Webinar 17: 100-YEAR PLAN ​& FUTURE EXPANSION OF CHINA! 

has been recorded! We are now editing and publishing it!


Patreon members $10+ get a discount, as usual!

Look for my announcements!

The webinar goes deep and captures the past, present and future of China, as well as much of Asia. We also discuss India, Japan, Vietnam and other countries. We discuss the past, present and future relations between China and Russia, USA, EU, Australia, N. Zealand and ASEAN, as well as the neighbors in the region and the real reason behind the South China Sea conflict! 

We go into history and I reveal to you the real motivations behind Mao, Deng Xiaoping, Xi Jinping and CPC’s actions! 

I answer a number of your questions and we also go into the New Silk Road, China’s trade, Yuan, and more!

The huge value is in the many valuable Quantum Calibrations I have performed especially and exclusively for this webinar. In this webinar I go all the way out:

~ I reveal the ultimate truth about the shocking past and positive present Karmic Weight of CHINA – and my Karmic Weight calibrations always foretell how any country will be doing in the future! 

~ I also give you the brand new calibration of the Chinese Economy and

~ I large number of calibrations identifying the real truth about the relations between China and: Russia, USA, India, Japan, EU, Australia, New Zealand and ASEAN! Here we do both current and future calibrations, up to 2035!

So, all great news and all good! 


I have one little favor to ask! I’ve redone the Webinar 17 banner/thumbnail. However, I can’t decide between the two. Please help me pick one!



Please VOTE in comments below which you think pops more for you!



As a reminder, this was the original banner (I will replace it with one of the new):

The whole series 4 banners will be updated – this is the original set:



Ask Your Questions for Webinar 18: Russia’s Silk Roads & The Future of Eurasia!

(question-asking is open to $10+ Lada Ray Patreon members!)

WEBINAR 18: RUSSIA & EURASIA: estimated release: March 10-12!

Final webinar of Series 4 & final webinar in the EARTH SHIFT WEBINAR FAMILY!!

​Info page for All webinars of this series:




ALL Earth Shift Webinars are available for purchase @ – all public access! 

Lada Ray Patreon members $10+ get a discount of $10 on this Series 4! 

Lada Ray Patreon members $10+ get a significant discount on ALL Webinars!