Same Rolling Stone magazine that FAKED campus rape story a few years back BUSTED with complete bullsh#t story claiming Oklahoma hospitals are filled with ivermectin-damaged patients

Monday, September 06, 2021 by: Mike Adams

(Natural News) No one is surprised anymore when a left-wing media outlet fabricates a story out of thin air and tries to publish it as “fact,” but when Rolling Stone completely fabricated a recent story trying to destroy ivermectin, it blew up in their faces in spectacular fashion.

The original story falsely claimed that hospitals in Oklahoma were filled with ivermectin-poisoned patients who had all overdosed on the drug, including a bizarre claim that one patient had gone blind. As the hospitals were being overrun with ivermectin injuries, Rolling Stone dramatically claimed, gunshot victims were forced to wait for medical treatment. The feature photo used in the story began raising questions almost immediately, however, when it appeared to show hospital patients wearing winter coats, supposedly standing outside emergency rooms in August in Oklahoma.

The story had all the accoutrements of a typical left-wing media smear piece: The sense of alarm, condemnation for those advocating ivermectin, and a supposed real-world cost in lives lost because hospitals were being completely overrun. (The media has been lying about overrun hospitals since day one of the plandemic…)

Here’s the screen shot of the Rolling Stone’s story headline and subhead:

There’s only one problem with this dramatic story: It was all made up.

Just like the time Rolling Stone utterly fabricated a series of stories claiming “campus rape” was exploding across America — which turned out to be completely false — the discredited rag did it yet again, trying to discredit ivermectin but only discrediting itself.

As InfoWars reports in exposing the fake Rolling Stone hit piece:

The problem is, Northeastern Health System‘s Sequoyah branch that’s the focus of Rolling Stone’s article released a statement on its website claiming Dr. Elyea does not work at the hospital, and has not treated any patients in at least two months. Furthermore, the hospital itself claims it hasn’t treated a single patient for ivermectin overdose.

NHS Sequoya also refuted Elyea’s claim that its hospital was overwhelmed with patients who overdosed on ivermectin and had not turned any patients away as a result.

“NHS Sequoyah has not treated any patients due to complications related to taking ivermectin. This includes not treating any patients for ivermectin overdose.”

“All patients who have visited our emergency room have received medical attention as appropriate. Our hospital has not had to turn away any patients seeking emergency care.”

Left-wing fake news media rags parroted the story as “fact”

Of course, the total fakery of the story didn’t stop left-wing media rags from catapulting the claims into popular consciousness. Business Insider, The Independent and The Guardian were among left-wing news outlets that ran with the story, not bothering to conduct even bare minimum fact checking before reporting the ivermectin scare story as if it were real.

Left-wing propagandists like Rachel Maddow (MSNBC) ran with the fake news story, repeating the lie that ivermectin was “backing up rural Oklahoma hospitals, ambulances” and claiming that people were suffering with “vision loss.”

Not only were the claims against ivermectin utterly fabricated, but even the “gunshot victims” part of the story was complete hogwash, likely a figment of imagination from another hyperventilating left-wing anti-gun nut who imagines the entire world being overrun with guns that shoot people all by themselves. As Zero Hedge explains:

What’s more, Grove, OK – with a population of 7,129, had just 14 aggravated assaults in all of 2019 according to the FBI’s latest data. We somehow doubt that ‘gunshot victims were lining up outside the ER,’ while just 11 ivermectin related hospital cases have been reported in the entire state since the beginning of May.

Mocking the fake news media, InfoWars founder Alex Jones trolled the left-wing media and hilarious consumed ivermectin horse paste live on air yesterday, demonstrating the drug’s safety and revealing how left-wing media whips itself into an irrational fear about almost everything:

https://www.brighteon.com/97aee7d1-cf80-47a5-9f05-ded276f486e2

In today’s Situation Update podcast, I delve into the total fakery of the smear attempt against ivermectin, pointing out that while typical Leftists are scared to death to touch ivermectin, they’re more than happy to inject themselves with biological weapons that are dishonestly labeled “vaccines.” Democrats also seem to love toxic fluoride and now GMOs, as mainstream left-wing media outlets have all gone pro-GMO in their coverage.

Brighteon.com/73a770d9-0873-426d-8040-b7329e53922a

In attempting to discredit ivermectin, left-wing media only discredited itself

The beautiful conclusion of all this is that in their desperate attempts to discredit ivermectin, the lying left-wing media only further discredited itself. As Glenn Greenwald pointed out, this entire incident once again proves that Democrats are happy to lie about anything as long as it serves their political agenda. They have no commitment to honesty, accuracy or truth of any kind. They will parrot a completely fictional story if it helps them push more vaccines that are killing people (while Big Pharma funds their operations with advertising money).

That’s the same reason the hard-core Dem Party media loyalists, led as usual by @Maddow, spread this fake story all over based on what appears to be a fraudulent source without checking. Fake News is 100% acceptable if done with good political motives:https://t.co/lzAXAHKrfN

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) September 5, 2021

Twitter, of course, which routinely bans those who criticize vaccines, Joe Biden or abortion, allowed the fake Rolling Stone story to trend and be openly shared, despite the fact that it was entirely fabricated.

No one is surprised.

In the end, while conservatives may be consuming completely harmless (and highly effective) ivermectin — which was approved as a drug for use in humans by the FDA in 1996 — Democrats are jabbing themselves with deadly bioweapons that will kill millions in the coming years, leading to collapse in Democrat voters (and an even more desperate effort by Democrats to make sure the dead can still vote).Previous :COVID IS JUST THE EXCUSE: Governments to demand constant surveillance of your blood, body fluids and medication complianceNext :American Medical Association releases stunning document teaching doctors to LIE to patients while deliberately exaggerating covid death claims… the AMA admits to its own complicity in crimes against humanity

Dr. David Martin drops bombshell: The FDA has only approved a COVID-19 vaccine that does NOT exist in the U.S. marketplace

Sunday, September 05, 2021 by: Nolan Barton

(Natural News) Dr. David Martin warned the public that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved a coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine that does not exist.

“When members of the mainstream suggest that this approval has suddenly put what is sitting in freezers around the world into an approved status, that’s actually not true,” Martin said during his appearance on “Brighteon Conversations.”

“There are still manufacturing guidelines that were not required for the EUA that would be required for a full-approved product.”

He told Health Ranger Mike Adams that the FDA has approved a “unicorn.”

“Comirnaty does not exist,” Martin said, referring to the brand name of the Pfizer vaccine granted full approval by the federal agency. “The approval is for future production of COVID vaccine.” (Related: FDA fraudulently grants full approval to Comirnaty covid vaccine, skipping stage 3 trials and ignoring data on injuries and deaths.)

Martin related that some vital information had been redacted in the approval letter that Pfizer had, as well as in its official publication from the FDA.

“The section of where it can be manufactured and when it can be manufactured is redacted, which is unusual given the fact that an approval letter is supposed to be a public announcement that makes these things visible,” Martin said.

COVID-19 vaccines should lose EUA protections

Both Adams and Martin agreed that the confusion brought by the approval was compounded by the extension of the emergency use authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer vaccine used for children between the ages 12 and 15, as well as for the Moderna and the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccines.

“The mandate for EUA has to live inside of no clinical alternative,” said Martin. “The moment there is an approval, then the EUA protections for Moderna and Johnson & Johnson would cease to exist instantaneously.”

In its approval letter, the FDA acknowledged that there is “a significant amount” of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine produced under EUA still available for use. The FDA ruled that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine under the EUA should remain unlicensed but can be used “interchangeably” with Comirnaty.

Under the circumstances, it was clear that the granting of full approval was a calculated move by the government to encourage businesses and schools to impose vaccine mandates and enable Pfizer to unload inventories of its COVID-19 vaccine under EUA. Martin said the Biden administration is pushing to get students vaccinated in time for the start of the coming school year.

Difference between fully approved and under EUA products

There is a huge real-world difference between products approved under EUA compared with those fully approved by the FDA.

EUA products are experimental under U.S. laws. Both the Nuremberg Code and federal regulations state that no one can force a human being to participate in the experiment. Under U.S. laws, it is unlawful to deny someone a job or an education because they refuse to be an experimental subject. Potential recipients have an absolute right to refuse experimental vaccines.

On the other hand, U.S. laws permit employers and schools to require students and workers to take licensed vaccines.

EUA-approved vaccines have an extraordinary liability shield under the 2005 Public Readiness and Preparedness Act. Vaccine manufacturers, distributors, providers and government planners are immune from liability.

The only way an injured party can sue is if he or she can prove willful misconduct and if the U.S. government has also brought an enforcement action against the party for willful misconduct. No such lawsuit has ever succeeded.

The Comirnaty vaccine is subject to the same product liability laws as other U.S. products. Licensed adult vaccines, including Comirnaty, do not enjoy any liability shield. People injured by the Comirnaty vaccine could potentially sue for damages. Jury awards could be astronomical, so Pfizer is unlikely to allow any American to take a Comirnaty vaccine until it can somehow arrange immunity for the product.

Public misled by mainstream media

Members of the mainstream media were quick to report that vaccine mandates are now legal for military, healthcare workers, college students and employees in many industries following the full approval given by the FDA to Comirnaty on Aug. 23.

The Pentagon promptly announced it will go ahead with its plan to force members of the military to get vaccinated against the virus, while New York City announced on the same day that all public school teachers and other staffers will have to get vaccinated. (Related: Pentagon orders ALL members of the armed forces to be vaccinated, essentially ordering thousands to die from blood clots and vascular damage.)

One of the first to implement the requirement was the State University of New York (SUNY) system, which has nearly 400,000 students and more than 85,000 faculty members spread across its 64 campuses. Several other prominent institutions are expected to impose vaccine mandates after consultation with their Boards of Trustees and state officials.

Fauci started all the madness decades ago

According to Martin, this madness all started in 1999. It was when National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Director Anthony Fauci came up with the idea of creating an infectious replication-defective form of coronavirus. Fauci paid researchers at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill to invent a pathogen that did not exist, Martin said.

Fauci essentially asked the researchers to create a bioweapon. “You cannot manufacture a bioweapon and not say that you’re trying to kill people. That’s what a bioweapon is for,” Martin said.

Kizzy Corbett, the person behind the development of COVID-19 vaccines using mRNA technology, once said: “It’s really cool because you don’t even need much of lab. You can build one of these on your computer at home.”

That, Martin said, is an admission of biological warfare.

“We are not talking about a virus. We are talking about an engineered pathogen,” Martin said. “We are not talking about a vaccine. We are talking about the introduction of a computer-simulated code in the form of mRNA – not to stimulate your immune system, but to turn your body into a factory producing S1 spike proteins similar to those found in coronavirus.”

Watch the full episode of “Brighteon Conversations” with Mike Adams and Dr. David Martin here:

https://www.brighteon.com/309412a4-65e5-4bd6-a7c9-52805b5a6b93

Follow Immunization.news for more news and information related to coronavirus vaccines.

Sources include:

Brighteon.com

ChildrensHealthDefense.org

NYTimes.comPrevious :Nurse: Holding patients hostage without visitors is medical kidnapping – Brighteon.TV (Bryan Ardis show)Next :Over 100,000 Australians sign petition opposing use of COVID-19 vaccines on children

Do you have the Delta Variant? It’s illegal for you to know. The latest piece of sheer insanity from the US government

by Jon Rappoport

As my long-time readers know, I’ve spent the past year demonstrating that the SARS-CoV-2 virus doesn’t exist. Therefore, the Delta Variant is a fantasy based on a fantasy.
However, I make forays into the official bubble where, of course, millions of people believe the virus and the Variant are real. I show that within the bubble, all sorts of internal contradictions and absurdities abound.
Recently, I quoted official sources who stated that the current PCR test can’t differentiate between SARS-CoV-2 and the Delta Variant. Only through deeper genetic sequencing of patients’ swab samples—a procedure that isn’t routinely done—can testers tell whether a person has the original SARS-CoV-2 or the Delta.
In order to know whether the Delta is widespread, a predictive computer model would have to be assembled. These models are notoriously inaccurate.
The bottom line? The tidal wave of propaganda asserting the Delta is everywhere, and is responsible for the escalation of COVID cases, is a sheer fabrication. The propaganda is based on a computer model.
That’s where the official bubble is, or was, when a new revelation surfaced. Buckle up for this one. On the scale of fabrications, it ranks right near the top.
You see, the genetic sequencing process, carried out to determine whether a patient’s swab sample reveals the original SARS-C0V-2 or the Delta…that process hasn’t obtained certification from the US government.
It hasn’t been approved in any way, shape, or form.
The labs who do the genetic sequencing are on their own. They have the final word on their own procedures.
And because of that, the labs are legally FORBIDDEN from reporting to patients whether they have the original SARS-CoV-2 or the Delta Variant. Yes, FORBIDDEN.
So a patient can’t learn that information. It would be illegal for the lab to report.
And since the genetic sequencing process looking for the Delta Variant hasn’t received any sort of government certification…any and all claims about how widespread the Delta is would be based on an unapproved procedure.
Official Science “experts” always proudly claim their tests have the government seal of approval. But in this instance, the test on which these experts are relying has NO certification whatsoever.
Getting the picture?
Here is the source on this latest piece of madness: Business Insider, August 23, 2021, “You aren’t legally allowed to know which variant gave you COVID-19 in the US, even if it’s Delta.”
“The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service (CMS), which oversees the regulatory process for US labs, requires genome-[genetic] sequencing tests to be federally approved before their results can be disclosed to doctors or patients. These are the tests that pick up on variants, but right now, there’s little incentive for the labs to do the work to validate those tests.”
“’I don’t think there’s a lot of motivation, quite honestly, to get that done,’ Kelly Wroblewski, director of infectious diseases at the Association of Public Health Laboratories, told Insider.”
“So far, Wroblewski said, more than 50 public labs in the US are capable of sequencing coronavirus samples to detect variants. But she’s not aware of any labs that have completed the validation process to get federal approval.”
“‘The process of validating a next-generation sequencing test is burdensome,’ Wroblewski said. ‘It takes a lot of time. It takes a lot of data. It takes a lot of resources…’”
“For a sequencing test to be validated, a manufacturer needs to collect data to show that the test does a good job of detecting a specific variant, then request emergency authorization from the Food and Drug Administration. Alternatively, laboratories can validate their sequencing tests ‘in house,’ meaning they collect the same data so CMS can approve their test.”
“’The letter of the law from CMS is that if you don’t go through this full validation process, you cannot release the results with patient identifying information,’ Wroblewski said.”
So…getting any sort of official approval for the genetic-sequencing test is a lot of work. It takes a great of deal of time. Therefore, yawn, why bother? Therefore, shrug, just let each lab set its own standards and make its own claims. Who cares?
And meanwhile, the patient can’t find out what his test showed.
And THIS is the insane system forming the foundation of claims that the Delta variant is everywhere.
Thus ends today’s episode of The Bubble and the Bubble Brains That Populate It.