More than 100 young people hospitalized for vaccine-related heart problems in Ontario

Tuesday, September 28, 2021 by: Cassie B.

(Natural News) A recent report out of Canada showed a high number of people experiencing vaccine-related heart problems, and the majority of those affected were young people.

According to the report, which was released quietly by Public Health Ontario, there were 106 incidents of pericarditis and myocarditis in people in Ontario under the age of 25 as of August 7, which is just over half of the total of all heart inflammation hospitalizations there. Thirty one of these cases were seen in people aged 12 to 17, while 75 of the cases were noted in people aged 18 to 24. Eighty percent of all of these incidents were seen in males, and nearly 70 percent of the cases occurred following the second shot in the series.

According to the report, public health units there were instructed to raise their surveillance for this particular side effect after reports emerged from Israel and the United States of similar side effects. Public Health Ontario started requiring the same-day reporting of post-vaccination myocarditis and pericarditis in June. The symptoms may appear as early as a few minutes following vaccination up to around three months following the jab.

The report states: “The reporting rate of myocarditis/pericarditis was higher following the second dose of mRNA vaccine than after the first, particularly for those receiving the Moderna vaccine as the second dose of the series (regardless of the product for the first dose).”

According to Public Health Ontario, the reporting rate of heart inflammation among those aged 18 to 24 was seven times higher among those who received the Moderna vaccine than those who were given Pfizer. The Pfizer vaccine is the only one being offered to those in the 12 to 17 age group, so it is not possible to make a comparison among younger people.

Overall, they saw 202 visits to the emergency room across all age groups for heart problems following vaccination, 146 of which led to hospitalization and three of which required admission to the ICU.

Among older individuals, 54 people aged 25 to 39 were included in the overall count, along with 44 people aged 40 and over.

The two heart conditions being seen following COVID-19 vaccination are myocarditis, which is an inflammation of the heart muscle, and pericarditis, which is an inflammation of the heart’s lining. The symptoms of these problems include shortness of breath, a fluttering or pounding heart, chest pain and malaise.

Additional studies support Ontario findings

Problems with post COVID-19 vaccine heart inflammation are being seen throughout the world, particularly in young men. In Israel, which is one of the world’s most vaccinated countries right now, a probable link has been established between the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine and myocarditis, mainly in boys between the ages of 16 and 30.

Researchers there discovered that one out of every 3,000 to 5,000 young men between the ages of 16 and 24 could suffer from this condition following their COVID-19 shot. Because the harm is greater after the second dose, the country has been mulling giving teens just one shot to protect them from heart risks.

Meanwhile, a study carried out by researchers from the University of California that analyzed adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines in American children found that healthy young boys aged 12 to 15 are four to six times more likely to be admitted to a hospital with inflammation of the heart following vaccination than being hospitalized with COVID-19 itself.

These studies provide valuable insight that all parents should weigh when deciding whether or not the risks of the vaccine are worth it for their children, particularly parents of young boys.

Sources for this article include:

SHOCKER: Three existing covid vaccines actually contain DNA (not just RNA) for spike protein synthesis inside your body

Wednesday, September 29, 2021 by: Lance D Johnson

(Natural News) The various COVID vaccines being rushed into existence do not operate as traditional biologics (vaccines) and are being falsely represented and regulated as such. Standard vaccines introduce attenuated (weakened) forms of a target virus, in conjunction with inflammatory adjuvant and other chemicals. These new mRNA, adenovirus-vectored, and DNA vaccines utilize the “software” of the virus, forcing the body to make copies of it.

Professor Jonathan Gershoni from Israel’s Tel Aviv University explains that three covid vaccines on the market are actually DNA vaccines. Inoculations manufactured by Sputnik V, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson contain DNA (not just RNA) that is inserted into the nucleus of human cells to ultimately translate and replicate lab engineered spike proteins.

India is getting a new type of DNA vaccine made by Zydus Cadila; it will be called ZyCoV-D. This vaccine contains less DNA than the other DNA vaccines and that DNA is not concealed by a viral vector (adenovirus). For these vaccines, the 1,200 amino acid sequence of the coronavirus spike protein is contained in a plasmid, and it is administered intra-dermally in a three dose, three-month protocol using a high-pressure stream of liquid containing the DNA.

Gene experiments, cellular reprogramming and the destruction of the innate immune system

The adenovirus-vectored covid vaccines all contain DNA from the engineered spike protein. These vaccines stealthily deliver DNA from the bioweapon, concealing it in an adenovirus shell. Once the spike protein DNA bypasses the innate immune system, its genetic instructions are transcribed into the human cells, mass producing lab engineered spike proteins.

The pharmaceutical media and the fact checkers continue to lie about the experimental, gene-altering science behind new COVID vaccines. In unison, they claim that the vaccines do not alter human DNA or change genetic expression. However, these vaccines are genetic experiments designed to keep humans dependent on vaccine updates; the inoculations were designed to breach the innate immune system for the purpose of altering how cells read the body’s own genetic code.

The adenovirus-vectored vaccines carry the spike protein DNA into the cell by using the adenovirus to subvert the innate immune response. The mRNA vaccines use lipid nano-particles to conceal the instructions and slip them into the ribosomes of the cell. In the initial process of subverting the immune system, these vaccines do not beckon a strong enough T cell response to elicit adequate T helper 1, T helper 2, and memory B cells. Because the innate immune system is not exposed to the whole virus, including the envelope and the nucleocapsid, the immune system SUFFERS. This incomplete and subverted immune response primes the body for severe disease upon subsequent re-infection.

No guarantee these gene-altering experiments are temporary

With this new vaccine technology, the messenger RNA or the DNA of a foreign, lab engineered spike protein is inserted into the body to overwrite the natural protein synthesis of the affected cells. Once this natural transcription process is re-engineered by the vaccines, there’s no guarantee that the cells will stop using this foreign code. There are no studies mapping where the spike proteins travel to in the body, how long they might last, or if their replication alters protein synthesis indefinitely and becomes a part of human cells or human DNA.

Because DNA is unable to transcribe by itself, the DNA vaccines must insert the foreign DNA into the nucleus of the human cell. This allows messenger RNA to make a disposable copy of the DNA, preparing instructions for protein synthesis in the ribosome. The RNA has the ability to interact with the ribosomes of the cell, and is responsible for encoding the type of protein the cell is instructed to manufacture.

As predominant mutations of the spike protein are discovered in the wild, vaccine makers can study that DNA and retool the DNA and mRNA in their vaccines, to replicate new sequences of spike protein in humans each year.

Firing Unvaccinated Healthcare Workers? An Alt-Middle Doctor’s Perspective

An important message from a compassionate doctor… so rare these days, plz share:

Are we really going to fire healthcare workers who won’t vaccinate…during a pandemic? Here’s one doctor’s take. Transcript, podcast, and links:…



17 hours agoThe protected need to be protected from the unprotected by forcing the unprotected to use the protection that didn’t protect the protected. 🙂

jose L

jose L

13 hours agoA recent BMJ article says “If natural immunity is strongly protective, as the evidence to date suggests it is, then vaccinating people who have had covid-19 would seem to offer nothing or very little to benefit, logically leaving only harms—both the harms we already know about as well as those still unknown,” says Christine Stabell Benn, vaccinologist and professor in global health at the University of Southern Denmark. The CDC has acknowledged the small but serious risks of heart inflammation and blood clots after vaccination, especially in younger people. The real risk in vaccinating people who have had covid-19 “is of doing more harm than good,” she says.”  I always wondered if there were some randomized clinical trials indicating the safety and need to “just get one shot” if you’ve had Covid.  I mean, either you believe in #naturalimmunity or you don’t, right?Show less13REPLYHide 2 replies

Lil Crafty Nook

Lil Crafty Nook

1 hour agoYes!!🙌🏻1REPLY

Basmah Harami

Basmah Harami

1 hour agoOn point!1REPLY

paper burn

paper burn

36 minutes agoConfirmed natural immunity has its place in the system BUT and its a big BUT it can not be the only part of the solution.(even the good doctor says this but most people do not get that as a takeaway by the comments.) Most people are not qualified to make and understand these decisions. consult your doctor or primary care giver so she can look at your history and recommend what is best. Not someone on YouTube you have never seen before, in an algorithm that is designed to confirm personal bias for the company’s profit.REPLY



16 hours agoA reasonable video as always, even though I am not in 100% agreement. No question the data shows that the vaccines are very effective against the development of serious illness and death. However, I am troubled by the continued use of “immunity” in discussing the rationale for mandates. We know that the COVID vaccines do not provide true immunity from infection the way that the measles, small pox, mumps, etc., vaccines we commonly received as kids do. Those vaccines boast infection efficacies into the 90 percentiles according the CDC. The current vaccines appear to be more in the fly vaccine range of 50% or so. The Israeli data shows efficacy for Pfizer as low as 39%. The CDC acknowledged this problem by changing the definition of “vaccine” on September 1, to no longer required immunity as a result, only “protection.” Even though you indicated a 5 fold reduction in infection for vaccinated individual, its clear that vaccinated people are also becoming infected and spreading the virus. To this end, a vaccinated health care worker also present a risk of spread to patients, which is not exclusively a risk associated with their unvaccinated cohorts. I am also not sure of the true significance of a 5 fold reduction given the contagious nature of Delta. Vaccination is not slowing down the spread in Israel, whose adult population is nearly 80% vaccinated. I am not against vaccination, but the I think the decision is a bit more nuanced than is currently proffered by the popular narrative. You have always been open to a more nuanced view of the issue, which I appreciate.Show less18REPLYHide 2 replies

Yves Heinrich

Yves Heinrich

5 hours agoVery well said! It’s no wonder the spread in Israel since early July was so consistent to an amass 90,000 infected. The irresponsibility of the government and health officials to maintain that potential herd immunity and still restricting travel, as both infection and date rates SIGNIFICANTLY dropped between May to June. Theaters reopened and there wasn’t really any mandate other than the masks, of course. It’s like May of last year. From 10,000 to 2,000 infected, Israel reopened and everything seemed to function as intended.1REPLY



1 hour ago@UC6Lv53T1QbkZvSfNUc2oMBw The data is strong that the vaccines are a great mitigators of potentially severe outcomes. I do note in certain demographics this is already a small risk, even without the vaccines. However, mandating the vaccines in the workplace is predicated upon preventing infection and spread, not personal health outcomes. The former is a public health issue and the latter a personal one. If the current vaccines were similar to the ones I mentioned above that are sterilizing, then the the rationale for a vaccine requirement would be more rationale. Essentially, mandating the vaccines for the personal health benefit of a nurse, with the threat of termination, for example, does not make sense.Show less1REPLY

paper burn

paper burn

36 minutes agobut vaccines have dropped the death rate of the vaccinated to very low levels. Not ending up dead sounds like a win to meREPLY



11 minutes ago @paper burn But that is not the basis for the vaccine mandates in the work place. Preventing the spread of infection is, which is not the primary benefit of this set of vaccines.REPLY

Geico Kaveman

Geico Kaveman

1 minute ago @Eddie757  but it is still one of the benefits. There are still data showing the vaccines work, still preventing infection in many people. It’s not that they don’t work, in fact they have admitted the Israel data of 39% was skewed. It’s not entirely accurate and may take more months before we truly know.

UK hospital data shocks the world: 80% of COVID deaths are among the vaccinated… COVID deaths up 3,000% after vaccine wave

Tuesday, September 28, 2021 by: Lance D Johnson

(Natural News) A deadly combination of science fraud, institutional coercion, bribery, Big Tech censorship, government force and media propaganda are bringing the world to its knees. There is NO real-world data showing that covid-19 vaccines reduce the risk of hospitalization and death. Right now, hospital data from the United Kingdom is shocking the world, providing serious evidence of vaccine failure and vaccine-induced death. In the UK, up to 80 percent of COVID deaths are currently coming from vaccinated people. COVID deaths across the UK are now 3,000 percent more frequent than they were at the same time a year ago, when the population was “unvaccinated.”

For over a year, vaccine efficacy was tirelessly promoted, even though absolute risk reduction for all the COVID vaccines on the market was less than two percent, a meaningless number. To make matters worse, the vaccines are increasing the rate of iatrogenic death and making more people susceptible to severe respiratory disease, priming human cells for antibody dependent enhancement.

UK Public Health mortality data shocks the world

The UK’s Yellow Card Scheme, a vaccine injury and medical error surveillance system, shows a clear pattern of vaccine failure. COVID vaccines are increasing hospitalization and death for people who could have easily gone on with their lives, healthy and VAX-free. Instead of being coerced into risky, compounding vaccine experiments, thousands of sick and dying people could have faced a potential infection and recovered with durable, natural immunity.

UK hospital data shows that covid-19 deaths are 3,000 percent higher now compared to this time last year, and it’s not the “unvaccinated” who are dying in greater numbers. The latest data from Public Health England shows just how dangerous vaccine worship and coercion is. From February 1, 2021 to September 12, 2021, the unvaccinated represented just 28 percent of the covid fatalities while the vaccinated represented 72 percent of the deaths!

Public Health Scotland confirms the same pattern of vaccine failure. From August 14, 2020 to September 12, 2020, Scotland recorded just seven covid-19 fatalities. After coercing a large portion of the population to take the covid vaccines, Scotland recorded 222 covid-19 deaths just a year later, during that same period of time. This covid-19 death spike is 3,071.4% higher after a mass vaccination campaign. Most shocking of all: 80 percent of these deaths are occurring in the vaccinated. (Related: The “fully vaccinated” will experience enhanced disease when re-exposed to new coronavirus variants.)

Vaccine’s purported 95% efficacy is a total fraud in the real world, actually increases risk of death

Even though the unvaccinated are coerced to test more frequently for travel, education and work, their numbers are still similar to the “fully vaccinated.” The data shows that COVID cases are relatively equal among the vaccinated and unvaccinated. From August 21, to September 17, 2021, there were 69,639 positive cases recorded among the unvaccinated population, and 79,613 cases among the vaccinated population, with 60,923 of these cases deriving from the “fully vaccinated.” Clearly, the vaccine doesn’t prevent COVID, and may even be a driving force for new infections in the unvaccinated.

Most shocking, the rate of death is not 95 percent lower in the vaccinated group. From August 14 to September 10, 2021, Scotland registered 208 covid-19 deaths. There were 41 deaths in the unvaccinated, 9 deaths in the partially vaccinated, and a shocking 158 deaths in the fully vaccinated. If the 95 percent efficacy of the vaccine was real, then 95 percent of the deaths would occur in the unvaccinated and only 5 percent would be in the vaccinated. However, up to 80 percent of the deaths are in the vaccinated and only 20 percent of the deaths are in the unvaccinated. The vaccines are currently INCREASING the risk of death in the UK by 400%!

For more on the COVID vaccine failure, read up at ScienceFraud.News.

Sources include:

ScienceFraud.newsPrevious :STUDY: Vaccinating children against COVID makes zero sense; more children are harmed by the vaccines than from COVID