Coronavirus vaccine-induced injuries and deaths are a “public health threat,” warns Dr. Peter McCullough

Friday, December 03, 2021 by: Zoey Sky

(Natural News) Dr. Peter McCullough warned that diseases caused by Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines are a “leading public health threat.” Instead of protecting people from the disease, COVID-19 vaccines are causing injuries and deaths.

McCullough is an internist, cardiologist and epidemiologist who practices medicine in Dallas. He helps patients dealing with various cardiovascular complications caused by the coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) and the COVID-19 vaccines.

In a recent episode of his podcast “The McCullough Report,” he interviewed Dr. Bruce Patterson to discuss COVID vaccines and spike proteins.

According to Patterson, the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2 may be harmful and inflammatory on its own. The spike protein can also linger in the human body for as long as 15 months after a severe infection. (Related: Army surgeon warned that pilots could die in midair from COVID vaccine injuries… but was ignored.)

The mRNA injections instruct your body to make a similar version of this virus’s spike protein, which can start to accumulate in tissues throughout the body. The spike proteins created because of the vaccines are very likely behind the reported cases of adverse reactions in vaccinated individuals.

McCullough explained that as the pandemic ebbs, the public “can expect to learn and hear more about how the COVID-19 vaccines – which are now administered by mandate and in some countries by force – grow in strength as the leading public health threat and become significant determinants of a whole new class of illnesses leading to disability, hospitalization and death.”

During the wait for long-term data on coronavirus vaccines, the virus continues to mutate, which spells trouble for mass vaccination efforts. Reports say that the pandemic is nowhere near the end, especially since new variants continue to be reported.

After Thanksgiving in the U.S., mainstream media started spreading fear and panic among citizens about the latest coronavirus variant called omicron. Allegedly, omicron is more transmissible, but this doesn’t necessarily mean it’s more dangerous than current COVID-19 variants.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, President Joe Biden’s chief medical advisor, predicted that the omicron variant will spread “all over.” Experts have yet to determine if current coronavirus vaccines are effective against the new variant.

According to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), coronavirus vaccines aren’t 100 percent effective against existing variants of the virus for many individuals. This suggests that mRNA vaccines won’t be as effective against the omicron variant.

Vaccine expert: Mass vaccination during pandemic is dangerous

Virus mutations are natural. The problem is, viruses will evolve much faster if there is a lot of pressure on them to do so – such as when a worldwide vaccination program is enforced during an “ongoing and rapidly evolving pandemic.”

This phenomenon was described in detail by Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, a Belgian virologist, vaccine expert and former employee of The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. He uploaded on his website an open letter calling on the World Health Organization (WHO) to immediately halt all coronavirus (COVID-19) mass vaccinations.

“This type of prophylactic vaccines is completely inappropriate, and even highly dangerous, when used in mass vaccination campaigns during a viral pandemic,” he wrote.

A prophylactic or preventative vaccine involves introducing antigens into a person’s body. The goal is that the individual’s immune system will create antibodies for those antigens, and become immune to the associated illness.

According to Vanden Bossche, the mass vaccination drives are “likely to further enhance adaptive immune escape as none of the current vaccines will prevent replication or transmission of viral variants.” Immune escape is a term used to describe when the host is no longer able to recognize and counter a pathogen, such as a relevant variant or mutant of SARS-CoV-2.

Bossche concluded his letter by encouraging the WHO and all stakeholders to take immediate action and address this public health threat of international concern.

Visit for more news on vaccine-related injuries and deaths.

Sources include:[PDF]Previous :Natural healing: 12 Cold and flu home remedies

Russian scientist claims omicron strain “could end COVID pandemic”

Friday, December 03, 2021 by: Ramon Tomey

(Natural News) A Russian scientist has claimed that the latest Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “variant of concern” could spell the end of the pandemic. The expert said the B11529 omicron strain’s multiple mutations work against it.

Dr. Anatoly Altstein put forward this claim in an interview with Moscow tabloid KP. The virologist at the Gamaleya National Center of Epidemiology and Microbiology – which developed the Sputnik V COVID-19 vaccine – said it would take months before omicron becomes the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant.

Despite this, Altstein said it remains unclear how infectious the new strain might be. The question of omicron causing more COVID-19 fatalities than the B16172 delta variant also remains unclear, he added.

“Right now, there are reasons to think that the omicron variant could be less pathogenic. We already see omicron has many mutations – more than 30 in a single gene of its spike protein. This is too many, and it means the virus has an unstable genome. As a rule, this sort of infectious agent becomes less dangerous because evolutionarily, an overwhelming number of mutations leads to a weakening of the virus’s ability to cause disease.”

If his argument holds true, Altstein said omicron infections would be fatal in only a small fraction of cases – and would become like other common seasonal infections.

“We shouldn’t be afraid that the omicron variant is spreading widely, but that it could turn out to be the most pathogenic variant, making infection worse.”

Altstein’s argument followed a less-than-dismal report about the omicron strain that contradicts the mainstream media’s fear-mongering narrative. South African Medical Association Chairwoman Dr. Angelique Coetzee said that the omicron variant only causes mild disease.

“It presents mild disease with symptoms being sore muscles and tiredness for a day or two. So far, we have detected that those infected do not suffer loss of taste or smell. They might have a slight cough, [but] there are no prominent symptoms. Of those infected, some are currently being treated at home.” (Related: Top South African doctor says COVID-19 omicron variant symptoms are “mild”.)

Countries close their borders to keep omicron out

First identified in South Africa, the omicron strain reportedly spreads faster than the earlier delta variant first identified in India. The omicron variant possesses 32 mutations in its spike protein alone, more than delta’s 13 to 17 mutations. The virus’s spike protein lets it latch onto human cells and multiply inside them.

However, many countries have moved quickly to close their borders in order to prevent the omicron strain from entering the country. Japan and Israel are two such nations that closed themselves off.

Japan Times report said the Japanese government had announced a ban on incoming foreign travelers on Nov. 29. The ban, which will last for a month, became effective the next day on Nov. 30. However, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida clarified that Japanese nationals or foreign residents returning home would be exempted from the ban.

“This is a preventative, emergency measure to avoid a worst-case scenario. Research is needed to determine how contagious the omicron variant is globally. It’s crucial that we respond to the situation quickly and flexibly,” Kishida told reporters.

Israel also followed suit, announcing a ban on incoming travelers last Nov. 27. Returning Israelis – including those injected with the COVID-19 vaccine – would be isolated for three days. They would also be tested upon arrival and after the quarantine period, only being permitted to leave once a negative result is obtained.

Travelers coming from 50 “red” countries in Africa declared by the Israeli government would be subjected to a longer period of isolation and more frequent testing, the Jerusalem Post reported. (Related: Highly vaccinated Israel closes borders amid fears of the omicron variant spreading.)

“We are not taking any chances. We want to stop this early. We want to prevent or delay the entrance of this variant into Israel,” the country’s Prime Minister Naftali Bennett said. He added that Israel will “act fast, early, hard and strong” to keep Israelis safe. has more articles about the B11529 omicron strain.

Sources include:

JPost.comPrevious :Texan billed $4,000 for COVID-19 test, says he feels “deceived”

HUGE: Federal judge strikes down DOD claim that Pfizer’s EUA “vaccine” and Comirnaty are “interchangeable”

Friday, December 03, 2021 by: Ethan Huff

(Natural News) U.S. Federal District Judge Allen Winsor of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida has ruled that Pfizer-BioNTech’s Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine” bearing emergency use authorization (EUA) is not interchangeable with the company’s new Comirnaty injection, which was fully licensed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) back in August.

Since the two injections contain different ingredients and are manufactured in different ways, Judge Winsor said that they are legally not the same, and that the EUA one cannot be forced on people by the Department of Defense (DOD).

Judge Winsor did, however, reject a preliminary injunction requested by 16 service members against the U.S. military’s Chinese Virus injection mandate. A hearing for that case is scheduled for Sept. 14, 2022, which is nearly 10 months down the road.

Judge Winsor’s decision about the EUA injection from Pfizer-BioNTech also applies to those from Moderna and Johnson & Johnson (Janssen), both of which are also not approved or licensed by the FDA.

It turns out that the FDA’s approval of Comirnaty was accompanied by confusing documents and equally confusing public statements that did not specify any differences between the two injections.

“The licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products can be used interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns,” one such confounding statement read.

“The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness.”

The FDA utterly failed to explain how the licensed Comirnaty injection and the Pfizer-BioNTech EUA jab could “be used interchangeably,” despite having “certain differences” that make them “legally distinct.”

EUA drugs CANNOT be mandated under U.S. law

As explained by The Defender, EUA products are considered experimental under U.S. law. This means that they cannot be mandated, and everyone has the right to refuse them.

“?he Nuremberg Code, as well as federal law, provide that no human being can be forced to participate in a medical experiment,” The Defender further reported.

“Under 21 U.S. Code Sec.360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), ‘authorization for medical products for use in emergencies,’ it is unlawful to deny someone a job or an education because they refuse to be an experimental subject.”

The FDA’s own fact sheet also says something similar, explaining that under an EUA, “it is your choice to receive or not receive the vaccine. Should you decide not to receive it, it will not change your standard medical care.”

Licensed vaccines can supposedly be pushed on employees and students, according to The Defender, however it is not explained how or why from a constitutional perspective.

Interestingly, the law further states that once a fully licensed product becomes available, in this case Comirnaty, none of the EUA products can continue to be administered. This means that the Biden regime and anyone else trying to force people to take any of these injections is a criminal.

Keep in mind that Comirnaty is not even available to the public yet. This means that there are no vaccines currently available that can legally be mandated on anyone.

“This EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and COMIRNATY will end when the Secretary of HHS determines that the circumstances justifying the EUA no longer exist or when there is a change in the approval status of the product such that an EUA is no longer needed,” the FDA fact sheet explains.

Acting FDA commissioner Dr. Janet Woodcock said much the same thing about how the “black letter law is clear.”

“There can be no biologic license approved to a medical product for diagnosing, preventing or treating COVID-19 if there is also still an Emergency Use Authorization for the same medical product serving the same purpose,” she said.

More of the latest news about the Chinese Virus injection scam can be found at

Sources for this article include:

NaturalNews.comPrevious :MONSTER: Fauci runs “secret island of monkeys” to conduct cruel animal experiments to enrich Big Pharma