If hospitals had utilized the Zelenko protocol with intravenous vitamin C and vitamin D, then covid-19-associated deaths would be virtually nonexistent

Friday, January 21, 2022 by: Lance D Johnson

(Natural News) A multi-center, randomized, open-label study assessed the effectiveness of vitamin D and the Zelenko protocol (hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and azithromycin). Seven hospitals in Turkey applied the treatment protocol with and without vitamin C to study its effectiveness for shortening the duration of illness and prevention of death.

Out of the 237 hospitalized patients, (ages 22-99), one passed away at the age of 70. The patient had severe vitamin D deficiency and underlying heart and lung disease. The remaining 99.58% of patients recovered with broad spectrum, natural immunity. During the study, the researchers found that 97% of all the hospitalized patients were vitamin D deficient. Patients who were severely vitamin D deficient (55%) were more likely to end up in the ICU and be hospitalized longer. A majority (73%) of hospitalized patients also suffered from underlying comorbidities such as diabetes, heart and lung disease.

The researchers found that intravenous vitamin C sped up patient recovery from an average of 45 days in the hospital to 15 days. The study concludes that a “treatment protocol of HCQ, AZM, and zinc with or without vitamin C is safe and effective in the treatment of COVID-19, with high dose IV vitamin C leading to a significantly quicker recovery.”

The suppression of efficacious treatments has turned hospitals into modern day gas chambers

After the World Health Organization (WHO) declared a “worldwide pandemic” in February of 2020, all eyes were fixated on hospital capacity. Even though most hospitals around the country never witnessed a much-anticipated surge in infections, there were inner city hospital systems that saw burgeoning fatality rates. Hospitals in New York City were among the first to advertise their failure in treating covid-19 patients.

These inner-city hospitals are normally overcrowded with influenza, pneumonia, RSV and various nosocomial infected patients, but in 2020, during the covid-19 awakening, the world got to see the problems within the medical system. Hopeless ventilation protocols were the standard of care from the start. The federal coronavirus response, under the leadership of Dr. Anthony Fauci, forced the widespread manufacture of these machines.

Fearing the spread of an unknown strain of severe acute respiratory syndrome, hospitals were incentivized to diagnose covid-19 early and often, even when it was merely suspected. Fraudulent PCR testing was rolled out en masse, even though it was never designed to identify and properly diagnose a single infectious disease. Droves of hospital patients were rushed onto a closed loop system, aka ventilators, to stop them from “spreading” or breathing into the surrounding air. These devices of death destroyed lungs, imparted oxidative damage, caused nosocomial infections and cytokine storms, leading to ghastly fatality rates. Under this system of terror and iatrogenic error, hospital systems were exposed as modern-day gas chambers.

Under Fauci, patients were forced to suffer, to force more suffering into existence via bioweapon vaccine experiments

Under Fauci’s leadership,  hospital systems disregarded all the efficacious treatment protocols that were being used successfully around the world. Effective treatment protocols from independent US clinics were also ignored and censored. The Zelenko protocol used hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), zinc and azithromycin early on to successfully treat thousands of patients. But insurance companies and the pharmaceutical industry dominate the medical profession, using regulatory agencies like the FDA to impose their so-called science onto medical professionals. Fauci was quick to shut down the Zelenko protocol in the US, but pushed for the widespread use of highly profitable Remdesivir, which only contributes to renal failure, iatrogenic error and increasing fatality rates.

In order to legally approve a “vaccine” with the FDA’s emergency use authorization, no efficacious treatment protocols can exist. The mRNA vaccine experiment that has contributed to further medical error and early death, was forced on the US and the rest of the world by simply withholding valuable information on viable treatments and by suppressing the use of nutraceuticals, antivirals, herbal medicine, bronco-dilators, immune-modulators and anti-inflammatory drugs. After two years of following along with these crimes against humanity, many medical professionals clearly look like Mengele puppets now, pushing propaganda and withholding treatments that work.

Dr. Fauci, the CDC and the FDA do not need to be investigated because their crimes are right out in the open. Fauci and the dictators at the CDC use the staggering covid-19 death toll to blame the unvaccinated, but these public health propagandists are really just using innocent people as scapegoats to cover up for the government’s extensive list of crimes. Meanwhile, the “unvaccinated” are still treated poorly in US hospitals, and they have to fight for their right to use basic anti-viral protocols while they are wrongfully isolated, discriminated and mistreated in the hospital death chambers.

If hospitals utilized hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), zinc and azithromycin (the Zelenko protocol), along with intravenous vitamin C, vitamin D, nutritious juices, ivermectin and plant-based antivirals, then covid-19-associated fatalities would be virtually nonexistent. These treatment protocols were common knowledge long before 2020, but hospitals are not financially incentivized to treat infectious diseases properly. These institutions of death are set up to profit from people’s suffering. Even sadder: kind healthcare professionals are forced to work in this coercive environment of despair, droning away in a divisive, abusive culture where they don’t even have authority over their own conscience or body autonomy anymore.


Sources include:






Brighteon.comPrevious :Highly disturbing child indoctrination video from Canada shows brainwashed vaccine Nazis calling for the arrest of innocent people

A plea to allow the use of Ivermectin as Covid-19 treatment delivered to Ramaphosa’s house


29th July 2021 by Nadya Swart

The calls of medical professionals for Ivermectin to be used for the prevention and treatment of Covid-19 have reached desperate levels. An article by Professor Colleen Aldous, published on BizNews.com this week, argued that the placement of our trust in a small group of experts who advocate against Ivermectin is being done at the potential cost of human life. Considering the devastation that South Africa has endured due to Covid-19 and the resultant lockdown regulations – it seems absurd not to explore all and any viable alternatives to Covid-19 vaccination in order to best manage the pandemic’s merciless grip. This article, written by eleven doctors and professors to the Department of Health, urges the Department to facilitate the use of Ivermectin in the public health sector. The article was delivered to President Cyril Ramaphosa’s house by Jeremy Gordon who believes that we could end the crisis of the pandemic with the use of Ivermectin as they have in Zimbabwe. – Nadya Swart

Ivermectin studies and statistics

Twenty countries are using Ivermectin to treat Covid-19. They include Mexico, Guatemala, Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Portugal, Nigeria, and Egypt. In South Africa doctors are allowed to prescribe Ivermectin, but it is not being rolled out everywhere and in hospitals and clinics. 

According to Jackie Stone, a doctor in Zimbabwe, since January – when Ivermectin began to be used – it has cut COVID hospital admissions and deaths over 70%.  

“The death rate rose sharply in January and peaked on the 25th at 70 deaths per day. Official authorisation for the use of Ivermectin was granted on 26th January. Just one month later, on 26th February, the COVID death rate had fallen to zero”.

A meta-analysis gold standard review of 24 randomised trials conducted in 15 countries among more than 3400 people worldwide of clinical trials – just released by the BIRD group in the UK – showed that deaths are dramatically reduced when Ivermectin is administered. Published in the American Journal of Therapeutics the most rigorous statistical standards were applied by world-leading biostatistician, Mr Andrew Bryant, and medical doctor and researcher Dr Tess Lawrie. The results concluded that Ivermectin has an over 70% success in preventing deaths in hospitalised patients.

Mexico City authorities created a home-treatment-kit, including Ivermectin, for its 22 million-strong population in December 2020 and cut hospitalisations by over 70%.

Those Indian states that adopted Ivermectin policies saw their cases fall far more than 80%; Uttar Pradesh – down 98% [37,944 to 596], Uttarakhand – down 97% [9642 to 287] and Goa – down 90% [4195 to 423]. Delhi saw a 99% drop [28,395 to 238]. 

The bottom line is that Ivermectin works, and it works extraordinarily well. You do not need to be a scientist to understand these numbers, as they are self-evident.

If South Africa had a policy of testing and treating – as does Mexico City, which has emptied its hospitals since they implemented it, does – and of using Ivermectin for prevention for health workers and those not vaccinated – we could end the effects of the pandemic here. 

Besides cutting hospitalisations and deaths Ivermectin can also be used as a preventative. In Argentina, 788 health workers took Ivermectin weekly and 407 did not. After ten weeks, 58% of those not taking Ivermectin had become sick – but not one of those who took it became sick.

The use of Ivermectin has been restricted because the WHO says that further clinical trials are needed before they can recommend it. When asked about this, Dr Stone replied, “I find it very hard to understand how they can say that there is not sufficient evidence. There are three thousand patients plus in, I think, twenty-four trials where they demonstrate an over 75% reduction in mortality. Those figures fit exactly with what we have seen.”

Dr Tess Lawrie, one of the meta-analysis authors, in an interview with Dr. Mobeen speculated that the WHO and other regulatory agencies – which up to recently have had good reputations – may have been influenced by the lobbying of the pharmaceutical industry which is one of their chief sources of funding and which offers employment opportunities to the personnel who work in these agencies. The Emergency Use Authorisation of vaccines in the US and EU required that there was no alternative treatment available. If Ivermectin had been approved it would have been a problem to authorise the vaccines without proper trials.

The pharmaceutical industry will earn billions of dollars from vaccines and from expensive patented treatments that gives them an incentive to shape the narrative about Ivermectin to their own purposes. 

The Indian Bar Association (IBA) sued WHO Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan on May 25, accusing her – in a 71-point brief – of causing the deaths of Indian citizens because of their misinformation about Ivermectin. The legal notice of June 13, 2021 against her states that her “misleading tweet on May 10, 2021, against the use of Ivermectin had the effect of the State of Tamil Nadu withdrawing Ivermectin from the protocol on May 11, 2021 – just a day after the Tamil Nadu government had indicated the same for the treatment of COVID-19 patients.”

In Tamil Nadu – which withdrew their plans to use Ivermectin because of Dr. Soumya Swaminathan’s tweet – deaths rose ten-fold from April 20 to May 27 in contrast to the states in India which did use Ivermectin and where hospitalisations and death rates plummeted. 

On July 7, eleven South African doctors and professors signed a letter to South Africa’s Department of Health requesting that they review their evidence-based approach to enable an Ivermectin roll-out through the public health services. The Department should enable those sectors of the public health services that want to use Ivermectin to do so. Ivermectin is an inexpensive, well tested and safe medicine which could help end the pandemic in South Africa and save the country billions of rands – and perhaps hundreds of thousands of lives.

Read also:

(Visited 68,715 times, 840 visits today)

Cyril Ramaphosa: The Audio Biography

Listen to the story of Cyril Ramaphosa’s rise to presidential power, narrated by our very own Alec Hogg.Get the Audiobook

Narration by Alec Hogg 

COVID deaths plunge after major world city introduces ivermectin

This article is from last summer, the current result: Mexico City has very low Covid cases and near zero deaths using Ivermectin as prescribed by physicians from the FLCCC Alliance Protocol. Cheers for MC!

Added by Debra Tash on May 31, 2021.
Saved under GeographiesHealthInternationalLifeNewsNewsworthy
Tags: Art MooreCOVID-19ivermectinMexico CitytreatmentWorld Net Daily

#wnd, wnd news center,Farah, Pray For Me, Big Tech

By Art Moore WND News Center

Authorities create home-treatment-kit for 22 million-strong population

A citywide initiative in Mexico City to prescribe ivermectin to COVID-19 patients resulted in a plunge in hospitalizations and deaths, two studies found.

Hospitalizations were down by as much as 76%, according to research by the Mexican Digital Agency for Public Innovation, Mexico’s Ministry of Health and the Mexican Social Security Institute, according to a TrialSiteNews report highlighted by LifeSiteNews.

Earlier this month, as WND reported, a significant decrease in cases in India coincided with the national health ministry’s promotion of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine treatments.

In Mexico City, after a spike in cases in December, the city’s Ministry of Health created a home-treatment kit for residents. The city’s metro population is 22 million.

At the time, the head of the Mexico City Ministry of Health, Oliva López, said told reporters her agency had determined “that there is enough evidence to use in people positive for SARS-CoV-2, even without symptoms, some drugs such as ivermectin and azithromycin.”

Beginning Dec. 29, people who tested positive for COVID from an antigen test and who were experiencing at least mild symptoms began receiving one of the government’s ivermectin-based treatment kits, TrialSiteNews reported.

The Mexican government then began a study to track the impact of the early treatment of COVID with ivermectin on the city’s population.

The study tracked 200,000 people, dividing in two cohorts — those who received ivermectin and those who did not.Are governments preventing the public from getting treatments that actually help defeat COVID?Yes No  

Through a phone-call-based monitoring system and hospital data on admissions for COVID-19, the researchers found a reduction of between 52% and 76% in hospitalizations for those who took ivermectin compared to those who did not.

The government’s findings were corroborated by Dr. Juan J. Chamie-Quintero, a senior data analyst at private Colombian university EAFIT.

He found that excess deaths in the city dropped sharply only a few weeks after the ivermectin treatments began.

Chamie-Quintero also conducted a study in Peru, where the government approved ivermectin as a treatment for the virus in May 2020.

In the 24 Peruvian states that adopted early use of ivermectin treatment, excess deaths plummeted on average by 59% just 30 days after the peak death rate. And it had dropped 75% after 45 days in those over 60 years old.

‘Large, statistically significant reductions in mortality’

Worldwide, more than 50 peer-reviewed studies have shown the effectiveness of ivermectin as a treatment and prophylaxis against COVID-19.

A study by the American Journal of Therapeutics that analyzed 18 randomized controlled treatment trials found ivermectin elicited “large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance” in COVID patients.

The study concluded that “the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.”

In February, a peer-reviewed study found that invermectin reduces coronavirus infections, hospitalizations and deaths by about 75%.

Ivermectin, in more than 30 trials around the world, causes “repeated, consistent, large magnitude improvements in clinical outcomes’ at all stages of the disease,” according to the study, which was published in the U.S. journal Frontiers of Pharmacology.

The evidence is so strong, the researchers believe, the anti-parasitic drug should become a standard therapy everywhere, hastening global recovery.

“The data is overwhelming – we are in a pandemic, and this is an incredibly effective way to combat it. If we use ivermectin widely, our societies can open up,” said study co-author Professor Paul Marik, director of emergency and pulmonary care at Eastern Virginia Medical School.

A previous study by Professor Andrew Hill of Liverpool University also found ivermectin cuts death rates by about 75%.

‘Inaction in front of mounting evidence’

Dr. Pierre Kory, the chief medical officer of the Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance, is known for his congressional testimony about the effectiveness of ivermectin. In a live Zoom conference May 13, he showed the promising data from various states in India in the two weeks after ivermectin was promoted.

See Kory’s presentation:



Editor’s note: youtube has already removed this video

In a Senate hearing in December, Kory presented evidence that ivermectin prevents infection and saves lives.

“Although we, like many, are extremely encouraged by the apparent successes in developing effective vaccines, we also are dismayed at the near complete absence of guidance and research on effective early, at-home, or preventative treatment options apart from vaccines, a reality we find unconscionable,” he said in his statement.

Kory said he and his colleagues are “worried that if our call to action is not followed through, confidence in our health care leaders and agencies will be irreparably tarnished.”

“Inaction in front of mounting evidence of safety and effectiveness during a catastrophic pandemic may also compromise widespread vaccination support,” he warned.

“We will look back to the impact that actions versus inaction had on the U.S. and the globe two months from now,” Kory said. “If we do nothing, the present trend will continue. History will judge.”

See testimony of a life saved by ivermectin:

Politicization of treatments

Dr. Harvey Risch, a professor of epidemiology at the Yale School of Public Health and Yale School of Medicine, is one of many health experts who decry the politicization of COVID-19 treatments such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.

“You can hardly believe what anybody says anymore,” Risch said in an interview in December with Fox News’ Laura Ingraham. “We’ve lost 300,000 lives in the United States because our government has basic told everyone to go home, stay home, and if you can’t breathe, go to the hospital.”

That’s not a form of treatment, he said, “it’s what we call therapeutic nihilism.”

He said the federal government, through the FDA, CDC and National Institutes of Health, have misrepresented the benefits of the drugs.

“These are drugs that everywhere else in the world they are being used very effectively,” he said.

Risch contends the COVID-19 mortality rate is five times lower in the Third World “because that’s all they can afford to do.”

“And we’re here twiddling our thumbs and telling everyone to stay home. It’s absurd,” he said.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center

Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE

181 COMMENTSNewest 


Terry 1 month ago

In Canada that treatment is against the law, if caught with it you are arrested. Liberals want us to die from this disease so it supports their narrative6 Reply


Firstis Reply to  Terry 8 hours ago

Yet no one is arrested when they buy 10 bottles of liquor and decide to kill themselves, right? That proves there is a murderous corruption behind the medical mafia’s agenda. It is not to protect us. They don’t care about us. It’s only to protect their profits in their vaccines, a “bargain basement” technology as Maurice Hilleman (noted vaccine developer) would call vaccines.The orchestrators of this really are pure evil, may God judge them, for they truly are Satan’s children.0 Reply


India vs Israel – Time To Admit Ivermectin Works? – New Human New Earth Communities 3 months ago

[…] deaths plunge after major world city introduces …https://www.citizensjournal.us/covid-deaths-plunge-after-major-world-city-introduces-ivermectin/Chamie-Quintero also conducted a study in Peru, where the government approved ivermectin as a […]3 Reply


Letters to the editor (10/6/21) | My Love Link – Health 3 months ago

[…] Mexico City with a population of 22 million dramatically dropped its COVID infections with Ivermectin. 24 states in Peru did the same thing (https://www.citizensjournal.us/covid-deaths-plunge-after-major-world-city-introduces-ivermectin/). […]1 Reply


Sue 3 months ago

Really? https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/mexico-reports-23006-new-covid-19-cases-850-more-deaths-2021-08-19/-2 Reply


Shadow Reply to  Sue 18 days ago

? The link is referring to Mexico,not Mexico city0 Reply


Sue 3 months ago

Wonder why India stopped using those drug except in organized studies?
https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/icmr-removes-ivermectin-hcq-from-revised-guidelines-on-covid-19-treatment-101632461755113.html0 Reply


Bob Reply to  Sue 3 months ago

They didn’t. Individual States determine treatment protocols in India. Uttar Pradesh has eliminated COVID with widespread early IVM use.3 Reply

Be careful out there

Be careful out there 3 months ago

Can’t help but wonder how are people spreading the lies, all of them. Pharma yes they make money, the vaccines some are mRNA others are not so the jab that you are referring to that other companies make may or may not work. Heard the jab would cause you to not be able to fight off diseases in the future, well that was a lie I got the jab and fought off COVID then 2 weeks later got sick and faught that off. Same time I caught COVID quite a few others did at my work it spread like wild fire, the vaccine recovered the quickest, the ivermectin non vaccinated got through it and like the rest of us that still had it bad, it still sucked for them for 2 weeks and a lot that were un vaxxed got ivermectin, I had azithromycin and vax got a bad case but basically a bad flu bug. Prior people in my work that caught it had almost no symptoms with no vax at the time, u don’t know how bad or better it’s gonna be, to claim anything being claimed is crap from you people, do your best to try to protect yourself but don’t believe the hype here folks, ivermectin make sure you follow doctors, u get the vax don’t get the mRNA if ur concerned, the other one that technology has been approved over 20 plus years ago so don’t fall into that bologne, expect any drug co to make money off u even the ivermectin one. Yes I know people that died from COVID, so don’t take this disease lightly. The ones I know were not vaccinated and were under a doctors supervision but it progressed differently in them-9 Reply


India vs Israel – Time To Admit Ivermectin Works? | Musings from the Chiefio 4 months ago

[…] deaths plunge after major world city introduces … https://www.citizensjournal.us/covid-deaths-plunge-after-major-world-city-introduces-ivermectin/ Chamie-Quintero also conducted a study in Peru, where the government approved ivermectin as a […]3 Reply

Homer Moarghen

Homer Moarghen 4 months ago

Ivermectin, like many other meds is the same whether for animals or humans. You must be a LBTRD.13 Reply


MeMyself&I 4 months ago

Thank you Dr. Phillip. But as you believe the science liberals preach, I will take my advice from a real MD. Follow the science, not the $cience.7 Reply

James M Dodson

James M Dodson 4 months ago

Ivermectin is not an untested drug. It has been around for about 40 years. The vaccines are less than a year old. Repurposing older and well established drugs like ivermectin should come as no big surprise. Many practicing doctors write off-label prescriptions without a flap.15 Reply


Jesse Reply to  James M Dodson 4 months ago

Sure, if you want to de-worm your livestock.-24 Reply

RuthAnn Wyman

RuthAnn Wyman Reply to  Jesse 3 months ago

No, it has a human version which has been given fir years for parasites in humans.13 Reply

Saved sue

Saved sue Reply to  Jesse 19 days ago

Documentary on Ivermectin. Check it out for yourself!
https://covid19criticalcare.com0 Reply

Sen Maxine W

Sen Maxine W 4 months ago

yes, the vaccine will kill, or greatly shorten the life of anyone taking it. but also notice that very few Blacks are taking the vaccine. so when all you facist Krackers die off, only the Black Race will remain.

we win1 Reply

Mike Smith

Mike Smith Reply to  Sen Maxine W 4 months ago

“yes, the vaccine will kill, or greatly shorten the life of anyone taking it. but also notice that very few Blacks are taking the vaccine. so when all you facist Krackers die off, only the Black Race will remain.

we win”

▲ ▲ ▲
| | |
| | |
| | |

This is what racism looks like, folks.23 Reply


MeMyself&I Reply to  Mike Smith 4 months ago

@Sen Maxine W
/sarc. Fixed it for you. Unless that’s really mad Maxine; then never mind.0 Reply

Toni E Fairley

Toni E Fairley Reply to  Mike Smith 4 months ago

Guys an idiot0 Reply

Mike Smith

Mike Smith 4 months ago

“Get the vaccines they are free, and are not meant for horses and sheep.”

1. They are not vaccines, strictly speaking. Vaccines are adequately tested.

2. They are not free: they are paid for with tax dollars.

3. They may actually be safer for horses and sheep, than humans.10 Reply

David A

David A Reply to  Mike Smith 4 months ago

Almost 4 billion doses were given to people. It is one of the safest drugs in the world.1 Reply

Go Galt

Go Galt Reply to  David A 3 months ago

You just wait for the 10 year review article on how many women are not able to conceive and the problems they see in the children born to those who are vaccinated. They’ve had many people die of clotting issues and myocarditis, and you’re not seeing the actual complications. As a Dr. myself, I won’t take it. The complications they’ve documented with every mRNA vaccine they’ve tried have been too severe for people to be their Guinea Pigs.11 Reply

Jim HWolves

Jim HWolves Reply to  David A 2 months ago

No actually it is not one of the Safest Drugs in the world. WIth more the 600k proven adverse reactions and over 14k deaths per the VAERS reporting system with is run by the CDC and FDA, I would not call that one of the safest drugs in the world.
Plus it is also confirmed by both the CDC and FDA that only 1 to 13 % of the actual Adverse reactions and deaths are actually reported on VAERS. So those numbers can be much much higher.
Even during the most recent FDA meeting they showed that the VAERS reporting increased just from the Vaccines 500% from the yearly average.
Link: VAERS – Download Data File (hhs.gov)
So making comments that the Vaccine is one of the Safest drugs in the world is very unsubstantiated.
When in fact an article posted abour Ivermectin actually stated the following:  “Ivermectin has won the Nobel Prize for medicine in 2015 and is on the WHO’s list of essential medicines. Prescribed to over 3.5 Billion people, Ivermectin has one of the best and longest safety profiles in the history of medicine.”
Ivermectin has proven more safe then the COVID Vaccines and has literally made entire countries practically COVID free, so much so that they have opened up to the Travel industry.2 Reply


James Reply to  Jim HWolves 1 month ago

Yeah, I just reported my death on the VAERS-8 Reply


Jesse 4 months ago

Even the manufacturer of ivermectin says it doesn’t work against COVID. Check it out for yourself.

Also shared in Merck’s statement are the many, many ADVERSE REACTIONS associated with Ivermectin, including:

arthralgia/synovitis (9.3%), axillary lymph node enlargement and tenderness (11.0% and 4.4%, respectively), cervical lymph node enlargement and tenderness (5.3% and 1.2%, respectively), inguinal lymph node enlargement and tenderness (12.6% and 13.9%, respectively), other lymph node enlargement and tenderness (3.0% and 1.9%, respectively), pruritus (27.5%), skin involvement including edema, papular and pustular or frank urticarial rash (22.7%), and fever (22.6%)

And you guys say this poison is a magic cure against the bio-weapon? Give me a break you fricking commies.

All you ivermectin FREAKS must be paid by the CCP to promote this poison. As for me, I will NEVER put ivermectin in my body. Go ahead and try to force me if you want you God-less commies, but I’m standing with Jesus, righteousness, and the second amendment.-20 Reply

J Spring

J Spring Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

Then explain the results in Uttar Pradesh, India who introduced the use of Ivermectin and their cases dropped like a rock, with only 5% of the population traditionally vaccinated. Numbers don’t lie, companies do.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1103458/india-novel-coronavirus-covid-19-cases-by-state/18 Reply


Jesse Reply to  J Spring 4 months ago

Then explain why Merck, who could make a bundle by promoting ivermectin for COVID, warns against its use for COVID.

Merck isn’t lying, you are.-10 Reply


Don Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

Follow the money! Ivermectin is in generic form now. Merck doesn’t make money off of it anymore! When you get your breakthrough case, maybe survival of the fittest will take place! Maybe you’re a survivor, maybe not. I hope you are! I’m not taking the word of any big pharma on this topic. Merck just got part of $3Billion to come up with a new therapeutic. Call me crazy, but Merck just got paid millions to say Ivermectin doesn’t work! I’ll take the word of docs/scientists that have nothing monetarily to gain from. This is one of the safest drugs for HUMANS there is. Docs in 2015 won the Nobel prize for medicine for curing River blindness. It just so happens to have anti-viral properties as well. Ivermectin, like numerous drugs, is a crossover drug that happens to be extremely safe! It’s on the list of essential drugs by the WHO. God bless!37 Reply


@RealJesse Reply to  Don 4 months ago

Sure they do. Here’s their product data sheet.

Stop making shit up, it just makes you look bad.-12 Reply


Bob Reply to  @RealJesse 3 months ago

Merck makes a lot more money if IVM doesn’t work than if it does. It is you who are making shit up.7 Reply


Dave Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

Because Merck is currently in Phase 2 trials of a new drug (Ivermectin plus) to treat Covid. Merck would rather make $20 a pill than $.50…use your head. I work in Pharma.14 Reply


@RealJesse Reply to  Dave 4 months ago

Okay, let’s use our heads Dave.

Your unsubstantiated claim is that Merck won’t sell a product they currently manufacture (even though its already been shown that they do actually sell the product) because they’re awaiting the results of their phase 2 trial for another product, and then will await the results of their phase 3 trial, and then will await FDA regulatory review before they finally have even a chance to start generating revenue from COVID treatment.

So if your “ivermectin plus” claim is true (please provide a source to substantiate your claim) they can decide to do one of two things.

  1. Sell ivermectin at $.50 a pill (your number not mine) for several years while the trials are ongoing and the FDA is in the approval process, and then any number of years later, if it becomes approved, switch to the new product for $20 a pill (again your number not mine).
  2. Or… they can withhold ivermectin from the market now (even though they haven’t) and perhaps in several years IF their new and improved drug makes it through the approval process they’ll get the exact same $20 a pill they received in the first option but forego all the sales at $.50 a pill.

So which is more money to Big Pharma:

  1. $.50 a pill for now plus $20 a pill in several years IF the new drug is approved
  2. nothing now plus $20 a pill in several years IF the new drug is approved

Cuz it sure seems to me like something now plus something later is gonna make more money than nothing now plus the same something later. But I’m just a boy from the hood, not a Big Pharma exec like you so you’ll have to explain how nothing is greater than something.-1 Reply

Barbara Quigley

Barbara Quigley Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

nobody “makes a bundle” on generics. Wake up. They are producing a new expensive drug to market course they don’t want people cured and fearless. I am an RN. Many human drugs are also used in animals. Ivermectin is safer than Tylenol and aspirin. HCQ is safer than Tylenol and aspirin. research will prove these statements correct. The genetic modification shots they call covid 19 vaccines are dangerous. I am seeing so many injuries from them and a few deaths in my patients. They are also causing enhanced viral replication in the “vaccinated” just look at Israel and the UK. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.16 Reply


@RealJesse Reply to  Barbara Quigley 4 months ago

So it’s in Merck’s financial interests to make no money rather than some money on their existing in-production drugs? And they’re gonna sit on the magic pills that cure COVID trying NOT to make money off them and trying NOT to be the hero of the pandemic? None of that makes a lick of sense.

And then you change the subject to hydroxychloroquine, Tylenol, and aspirin.

You’re not fooling anyone. We can all see right through you.-10 Reply

James Dietrich III

James Dietrich III Reply to  @RealJesse 3 months ago

You must be new to Earth. Generic means ANYONE can make it. Do you understand now?3 Reply


Bob Reply to  @RealJesse 3 months ago

Merck makes far more money if IVM doesn’t work than if it does. I know that might seem counterintuitive, but it’s true. Did you notice that Merck didn’t even do a study on IVM even though 63 studies show overwhelming support?6 Reply


Chris Reply to  Jesse 3 months ago

Jesse, while I applaud your faith in our Father and His Son, Jesus Christ, you should make sure you know the real facts on ivermectin. As pointed out, Merck doesn’t want ivermectin being used for 2 main reasons. 1) As pointed out, ivermectin no longer has patent protection, so ANY pharmaceutical company can make it. No bundles of cash to be made there.2) more importantly, Merck was given 1.2 billion (with a B) in taxpayer money to create a new drug to fight covid-19. So, of course they don’t want ivermectin to work, they have 1.2 billion reasons why they would discourage its use. Finally, looking at all the studies showing safety and efficacy, it’s clear that ivermectin(the human form) helps fight this virus.
The real problem is the fact that all our health regulatory agencies such as the FDA, CDC, NIH, etc are refusing to ‘follow the science’ on ivermectin. Why? It’s because if we found a drug that can defeat this virus, the vaccine effort would crumble, along with the billions of dollars being made from the vaccines. Im vaccinated (J&J…. no mRNA vaccine for me), so im not against vaccines(really gene therapy for covid mRNA shots) per se…. but we are witnessing the biggest crime of all time….. allowing people to suffer and die so the powers at be can make a few dollars. Anyone who says there is not enough evidence for using ivermectin is just not looking. There are over 60 clinical trials on ivermectin, and the results are clear…. it works. Just using as a preventative, 14 clinical studies showed an 86% reduction in transmission of covid-19. For more info, visit flccc.net. Lastly, anything coming from the FDA, CDC, NIH, or WHO should be viewed with extreme caution. They all have an agenda, and are in bed with big pharma.15 Reply


@RealJesse Reply to  Chris 3 months ago

Any company that can make a buck selling a product they currently have in production will do so. This includes Merck with Ivermectin. You probably don’t realize they are in fact selling it because they sell it under their trade name of Stromectol. But it’s 100% true they currently sell it.

And as Merck states very clearly, Ivermectin has not been shown to cure COVID. Please don’t take it for that purpose. If you have River Blindness then go right ahead, it’s a winner for that disease. And God bless you too.-11 Reply


Bob Reply to  @RealJesse 3 months ago

Would Merck rather have .20 per treatment or $700 per treatment? Do a smidgen of research.4 Reply

Kenny Lockett

Kenny Lockett Reply to  Chris 3 months ago

Also, Chris, remember, as with cancer, the money is in the treatment, not the cure.2 Reply


Vernon Reply to  Kenny Lockett 1 month ago

How’s everybody’s ivermectin working out for them?

Glad to see it cured everyone who got infected with the bio-weapon. It’s GREAT that the pandemic is over!

CCP and Deep State are pretty stupid to spend BILLIONS on a bio-weapon that’s easily treated by generic sheep dewormer.

Now Nunzab can go away and play with himself in private since the pandemic was cured by ivermectin.0 Reply


Truth Reply to  Vernon 15 days ago

Pay no attention to this troll for big pharma. Dont have a battle of wits with a unarmed communist.Just go around his posts say nothing kind of like not stepping in cow manure…Dont feed the troll……Truth1 Reply


Trainor Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

My sister in CA and her friend got Covid 6 weeks a go — they had a “doctor-on-wheels” prescribe Ivermectin. So I have evidence on a personal basis also! Within days they were well. A powerful article out YESTERDAY [Ivermectin Obliterated 97% of COVID-19 Cases in Delhi, India—Why is the CDC blocking its use in the USA?] starts off with a powerful statement we would do well to reflect on: “A 97% decline in Delhi cases with Ivermectin is decisive – period. It represents the last word in an epic struggle to save lives and preserve human rights.” The news of problems with the Pfizer vaccine is starting to get louder. The powers that be will not admit there is something terribly wrong.16 Reply


Don Reply to  Trainor 4 months ago

I’ve seen it over and over with friends that have been given Ivermectin and most have a 24/48 hr turnaround! Thank you for sharing!17 Reply


Don Reply to  Trainor 4 months ago

Also I’ve read a several articles where people on a ventilator are off 24 hours later after given Ivermectin. It works!16 Reply


Don Reply to  Trainor 4 months ago

https://open.spotify.com/episode/7uVXKgE6eLJKMXkETwcw0D?si=fut9js0ARXKvW19CTtsjqA&context=spotify%3Ashow%3A4rOoJ6Egrf8K2IrywzwOMk&dl_branch=10 Reply

Kenny Lockett

Kenny Lockett Reply to  Trainor 3 months ago

That is because this whole PLandemic is intentional!!!2 Reply


Jorge Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

The article you refer to was released on February 4, 2021 11:45 am ET.
It also states that “Company scientists continue to carefully examine the findings of all available and emerging studies of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 for evidence of efficacy and safety.”
Since that date, several studies prooved ivermectine’s efficiency agains covid:

In India, WHO’s representative is being accused for discouraging the use of ivermectine while it was saving thousands of people.

I’m not a freak, I’m not paid by the CCP and I love Jesus.
Maybe one day you’ll see the light 😉13 Reply


Jesse Reply to  Jorge 4 months ago

So, Mr. I love Jesus, why hasn’t Merck updated or even better removed there warning if they can make lots of money selling what you claim is an effective treatment?

If your asking me to trust your OPINION that it’s effective instead of the manufacturer who says it’s not why would I trust you?

Are you a biochemical engineer? Or are you a PAID AGENT of the CCP you commie POS?-19 Reply


Don Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

It’s a generic now. Merck doesn’t make any money from it anymore! Follow the money! Big Pharmaceutical does not care about YOU! They care about making money. Money, power and control!15 Reply


MeMyself&I Reply to  Don 4 months ago

Don, save your breath. Jesse is not listening. He just continues to parrot the same arguments that you just refuted. A true liberal doesn’t use facts to argue, just vitriol. So sad!12 Reply


@RealJesse Reply to  MeMyself&I 4 months ago

Sure I’m listening.

I’m just showing proof that all y’all are lying, again.

Here’s another to bring you back into the world of fact. Product data sheet for the ivermectin that Merck DOES sell.

See any vitriol here Mrs MeMyself&Irene? Just facts.

So sad!!!!!!!!-11 Reply


@RealJesse Reply to  Don 4 months ago

What do you mean Merck doesn’t make money from it anymore?

Here’s their online product data sheet. Of course they still make it.

I followed the money and Merck is where I ended up.-8 Reply


Bob Reply to  @RealJesse 3 months ago

Here’s a word problem for you, which number is larger, .20 (IVM) or $700 (MOL)?

Here’s a logic problem for you, if IVM works then there will be near zero sales of MOL. From a purely financial perspective (morality aside), do you think Merck wants IVM to work?5 Reply


Jesse Reply to  Jorge 4 months ago

Why does Merck still have their warning posted if it’s not true?

Aren’t they part of the money-hungry Big Pharma you keep complaining about? Don’t they just want to make money? Then why would they tell you NOT to take ivermectin for COVID?

With your clear agenda it’s obvious that you’re a paid shill, most likely sitting in Beijing or maybe Pyongyang. But guess what you commie bastard, you can keep posting but us Patriots see right through you.

MAGA.-14 Reply


Don Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

Follow the money! Ivermectin comes in generic form now! Merck no longer makes money off of it and they don’t care about you!9 Reply

James M Dodson

James M Dodson Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

You seem to be missing the point, Jesse. As Don has stated, ivermectin is now a generic drug, and Merck is not profiting from the sale of it.9 Reply


Jesse Reply to  James M Dodson 4 months ago

Oh really?

Dumb ass.-11 Reply


Chris Reply to  Jesse 3 months ago

Jesse, I’m not sure why you are so hung up on a statement by Merck….but again, since ivermectin no longer has patent protection, there is no money to be made…. at least not the numbers Merck wants to see. But, what has not been mentioned is the 1.2 billion dollars in taxpayer funds Merck was given to develop a new drug to fight covid…. so of course they don’t want people using ivermectin. Moving on from Merck, who also has NOT reviewed the clinical data on ivermectin, it should be noted that 14 clinical trials using ivermectin as a prophylaxis against covid showed an 86% reduction in transmission. That’s powerful. Regardless, we all need to pull together on this…. God bless you.5 Reply


@RealJesse Reply to  Chris 3 months ago

Any company that can make a buck selling a product they currently have in production will do so. This includes Merck with Ivermectin. You probably don’t realize they are in fact selling it because they sell it under their trade name of Stromectol. But it’s 100% true they currently sell it.

And as Merck states very clearly, Ivermectin has not been shown to cure COVID. Please don’t take it for that purpose. If you have River Blindness then go right ahead, it’s a winner for that disease. And God bless you too.-5 Reply


Bob Reply to  Jesse 3 months ago

It’s funny when you call people dump when you’re being dumb. Arrogance and ignorance are a bad combo.1 Reply


JSD Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

Get thee hence Satan, I mean Jesse.6 Reply


@RealJesse Reply to  JSD 3 months ago

Get thee hence Big Pharma schill, I mean JSD.2 Reply


Don Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

Man! I’ve never heard ANYONE on the pro-God, pro-USA side have your opinion! Most pro- God, Guns, USA people have the exact opposite opinion as you! But be on team forced vaccine if you want. That’s about as pro commie as it gets!11 Reply

Anthony Weiner

Anthony Weiner Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

Jesse, of course if you take 666g ivermectin every day, for 6 days, you will die. that is why there are such things as recommended schedules3 Reply

David A

David A Reply to  Anthony Weiner 4 months ago

It takes about 200 times the recommended fuse to be fatal. Try drinking 200 quarts of water. Ivermectin is safer then water.3 Reply

Cathy Buscher

Cathy Buscher Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

Merck created Ivermectin in 1975, introduced it to the market in 1980.bits been sold and taken by humans and animals for 40 years. Ivermectin has been used in the third world to treat parasitic infections and tested off label against viruses such as dengue fever. Ivermectin was awarded the Nobel Prize in 2015 for its effect on world health.

Merck can no longer profit from a generic drug that’s been taken by an estimated 4 billion people. Merck did present a letter criticizing this cheap therapeutic. They are not innocent humanitarians in this matter. The have a new drug in clinical trial they want you to buy instead. Why promote a cheap generic therapy when there’s billions to make selling a new cure.14 Reply

Kenny Lockett

Kenny Lockett Reply to  Jesse 3 months ago

Well, Jesse, I cuaght the ccp wuhan virus from a hunting buddy. Before he knew had the crap, my doctor brother told me about Ivermectin. I dosed myself and 2 days later woke up and could not small or taste but did not feel bad at all. Had a scheduled doctor;s appointment 2 days later. A PCR test revealed I was positive for the virus. I refused a monoclonal antibody infusion and got my sense of smell and taste back in 7 to 8 days. NO OTHER SYMPTOMS. My doctor said the crap should have killed me was 67 years old with COPD. IVERMECTN works to prevent the ccp wuhan virus and if taken early enough will stop it.5 Reply


@RealJesse Reply to  Kenny Lockett 3 months ago

Or just maybe … the ivermectin didn’t do jack shit for you and your body recovered anyway.

Really surprised you didn’t consider that possibility Einstein.-3 Reply


AMD23 Reply to  Jesse 2 months ago

hahahahahahahahhaahhahahaha you are so quick to bring up Big Pharma’s announcement of “don’t take this, we don’t have enough data and there could be side effects” but then proceed to ignore the fact that the vaccine safety and efficacy data is based off of a 3.5 month study and there ARE known side effects and no known long term effects but you choose to ignore them. Sorry since when is treatment allowed to be monopolized? Since when is there only one treatment for all? That’s not how science and medicine work. Also if there are studies showing significant benefits to covid using ivermectin, why are we not exploring all options? You are the commie you fricken idiot doing the dirty work of the government and discouraging effective treatments. Not one person who is on the side of ivermectin wants to force you to take ivermectin. IT SHOULD BE YOUR CHOICE AS IT SHOULD BE THEIR CHOICE. You don’t stand with Jesus, you stand with the DNC, the CCP, and the movement towards a totalitarian state if you support the mandate. (This is all based on the assumption that since you trust Merck statement word for word you also are the first to line up for the vaccine and boosters).

Also reading some of your other comments arguing why Merck wouldn’t just make quick money now with ivermectin. You’re not even thinking logically about it. Ivermectin is effective, why promote something that they use once when they could patent a new product (monlnupiravir) that isn’t as effective and keeps people coming back? Also no you aren’t going to find data on that but that’s how businesses work and unfortunately all these pharmaceutical companies are businesses first.Last edited 2 months ago by AMD232 Reply


Joan Reply to  Jesse 1 month ago

Ivermectin is off-patent moron. Merck won’t make any money off of Ivermectin. Merck has no proof it doesn’t work. I hope they are paying you a whole lot to promote the murder of millions.2 Reply


Jessie Reply to  Joan 1 month ago

Yeah, I’ll take the manufacturer’s word over yours, Joan.

YOU have no proof it does work you idiot. That’s because it DOESN’T work. I’m certain YOU will rot in hell for promoting the murder of millions. Jesus is coming.-3 Reply

R Jessop

R Jessop 4 months ago

How can I find the recommended prophylactic dosage of Ivermectin against Covid 19?

Can anyone help?0 Reply


Don Reply to  R Jessop 4 months ago

Front Line Covid Critical Care (FLCCC) Alliance. Dr. Kory and the other 4 docs that started this and are among the most published pulmonologist in the world prior to you ever hearing the word coronavirus! I’d say they’re pretty legit. They have protocols on there website and have a way for you to contact docs that will prescribe it. If you’re under 50 and healthy, they’ll say not to worry about it as a prophylactic. I would just call around where you live and find docs ahead of time that will prescribe it as well. I hope this helps! God bless! You can watch this also. You can speed it up to 2x normal speed and clearly understand it. It’s a podcast with Dr. Kory on it.9 Reply

Dustin H

Dustin H Reply to  R Jessop 4 months ago

This is with 3mg tablets. If infected take 8 tablets by mouth every day for 5 days. Or 8 tablets twice weekly for preventative. Hope this helps, just got it today from the doc. Good luck.2 Reply


Troy Reply to  R Jessop 4 days ago

On January 15th I stared getting chills….about an hour later I developed a severe headache with eye sockets hurting, teeth hurting, high fever and was super nausious. All I wanted to do was lay down and sleep but couldn’t because of the pain. I took the Covid test and guess what…I was positive. My sister had gone to Mexico and she bought us the human version of Ivermetin and I was in such pain I had to something. I took 21mg(pills were 6mg each…took 3.5 pills). 5 hours later the fever was gone, headache gone and this morning it’s like nothing ever happened. Believe what you want but if you get it like I had you’ll be wishing for something. For those of you who are not so skeptical here’s the recomended procedure for using Ivermectin. 21mg for the 1st dose…48 hours later take the same dose. As with any drugs…no alcohol! It can also be used as a preventative treatment too but you’ll need to do your own research there. All l I know it that it worked for me. Good day now!0 Reply


Troy Reply to  R Jessop 4 days ago

Here is what a doctor recommended for us….21mg the first dose….48hours later the same dose. No alcohol. I had covid with severe symptoms….5 hous later already feeling better. This morning…1/16/2022 it’s like I never had it.0 Reply


Troy Reply to  R Jessop 4 days ago

It’s Troy…I will will still follow up with 2nd dose.0 Reply


Kirsty 4 months ago

Why does this not link to the actual article? “which was published in the U.S. journal Frontiers of Pharmacology”3 Reply


Peter 4 months ago

Purely to score political points and damage his chances for re-election in 2020, the Democrats have attacked everything that President Trump said by taking it out of context, twisting it into a pretzel and then feeding it back though their Democrat-activist Media machine to spread to their audiences.

Remember when Trump suggested that hydroxychloroquine might be an effective treatment for COVID? The Media pounced on that statement and blamed Trump for the death of a man who drank aquarium cleaner because it contained chloroquine. It turned out that the story was fake news since it was the man’s Trump-hating wife who gave him the aquarium cleaner to drink just to get back at Trump.

Them, the Media began scouring their sources to find anything they could that went against using hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID, despite it having been used since 1946 and being safer to take than Tylenol. Like many other drugs that were developed for one specific disease, it was authorized for use to treat many other ailments for almost as long.

Between January and March 2020, the Democrats and their Media buddies deliberately downplayed the seriousness of the coronavirus for the same political reasons. Nancy Pelosi was telling people in mid-February to visit Chinatown and not worry about the virus. Talking heads on CNN & MSNBC were telling viewers that COVID was not as bad as the seasonal flu. They called Trump a racist for instituting the travel ban on China They also complained about attending the daily briefings from the COVID Task Force that Trump created ten days after the first case was identified in the US. After Trump said there would be a vaccine ready for distribution by December 2020, they called him a liar.

They did the same thing when Trump talked about receiving ivermectin and zinc at Walter Reed Hospital when he contracted COVID (for which a lot of nasty people, including members of the Media and Democrat lawmakers, were saying they hoped he would die from it). I have no doubt that the people who stood to reap a windfall in profits from the vaccines were among those advising against any anti-COVID treatments regardless of the evidence supporting their usage.

When you look back at the history of the pandemic and efforts to deal with it, you’ll find that it was the most politicized pandemic in human history. Plus, it was used by Democrat governors and mayors as the excuse to issue Draconian orders that stripped citizens of their Constitutional rights. What’s worse is how these same tyrannical leaders ignored their own orders by secretly attending parties or receiving personal services from hair salons without wearing masks or practicing social distancing.10 Reply


Augustus 4 months ago

Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine and other drugs may or may not be effective in treating or eliminating covid. What seems unbelievable to me is that few, including the information outlets in the US, are open minded to the prospect of alternatives and other ideas about how to help ourselves. What kind of mind says “NO!” without any investigation. Someone once said that contempt prior to investigation the true barrier to progress, or something to that effect.

Why not investigate, give these other treatments an honest, open minded investigation? If they don’t work, then we continue with what we have.

It’s sad that so many are so closed minded, and unwilling to take an honest look at what we’re dealing with, what is taking place in the world we live in. I’m skeptical of politicians, pharmaceutical companies and both sides of the political binary we have in the US. That doesn’t mean I can’t approach things with an open mind, and investigate, rather than take the word of those in power, and simply believe what I’m told.

It appears we have become an Orwellian nation. Independent thought, and questioning what we’re told by those who run the systems we live in have managed to create a system of control that is all but invisible to most.

If this sounds delusional or paranoid, see the BBC documentary about Edward Bernays, The Century Of The Self” or Bernays’ book, “Propaganda”. Chomsky (who I’m not a fan of) was right about the manufacture of consent.13 Reply

Michael A...

Michael A… 4 months ago

Swamp creatures, Moderna and Pfizer hope this cheap, available, over-the-counter drug gets buried as a treatment for Covid. There’s NO money in using ivermectin. Think about it.13 Reply


Jesse 4 months ago


Since Citizens Opinion won’t retract this dangerous-to-public-health “opinion” —

State of Mississippi warning about the significant health risks associated with taking Ivermectin for COVID

https://msdh.ms.gov/msdhsite/_static/resources/15400.pdf-14 Reply

Marisa Jones

Marisa Jones Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

Because people are not taking the correct dose, that is why…Did you read the entire article? Please read it before posting. This is approved for humans.15 Reply


Jesse Reply to  Marisa Jones 4 months ago

This is NOT approved for humans with respect to COVID. Stop lying.-16 Reply


Don Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

It CAN be used off label like many drugs. You stop lying! Sounds like you’re getting but hurt over this!12 Reply

RuthAnn Wyman

RuthAnn Wyman Reply to  Don 3 months ago

Yes, many drugs are used “off label”….there are several we use in the OB area where I work as an RN. And yes, there is a human form of Ivermectin which as been safely used for years!2 Reply

David A

David A Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

It now is approved by about 25 percent of the planet.4 Reply

Michael A...

Michael A… Reply to  Marisa Jones 4 months ago

Correct. But NOT horse doses.6 Reply


Don Reply to  Michael A… 4 months ago

Exactly! People buying it at the feed store and thinking if a little is good, a lot is better are just as bad Jesse here giving it a bad reputation. People need to follow directions! Find a doc that will prescribe it. I have got it for my elderly parents just waiting for if the day comes they get it!12 Reply

David A

David A Reply to  Don 4 months ago

Or go to a PDR, read the recommended dose, research the Mr Ed paste, and if nothing is harmful in the paste, consider going for it.2 Reply


Don Reply to  Marisa Jones 4 months ago

Exactly!!! Stay strong! God bless!3 Reply

Alex Torres

Alex Torres Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33578014/2 Reply


Don Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

You’re right! When you overdose on Ivermectin from a feed store it will mess you up and has numerous people! Take as prescribed by a doctor and it’s literally one of the safest drugs on earth! it’s also healed a lot of people. Keep listening to what the msm and google tells you. Use DuckDuckGo as a search engine and have your eyes opened wide to the other side of the story the world handlers don’t want you to know!8 Reply

Jeff Evans

Jeff Evans 5 months ago

United states government should be getting sued right now from all the people that have died from these experimental vaccines. Ivermectin could have saved so many people ‍♀️8 Reply


Don Reply to  Jeff Evans 4 months ago

Most docs are indoctrinated to do as their handlers tell them. I’ve found out over the last several years that just because they have md by their name doesn’t mean they have common sense and the ability to think for themselves! Lot dumb docs out there!10 Reply


Laura 5 months ago

What’s worse, America is trapped in contract with Pfizer. https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/frontlinenews/information-security-expert-on-revealed-pfizer-agreements-theres-good-reason-pfizer-fought-to-hide-the-details-of-these-contracts/ I just learned this.3 Reply

James Dietrich III

James Dietrich III Reply to  Laura 3 months ago

You spelled Ivermectin Denial wrong.0 Reply

Bill Coody

Bill Coody 5 months ago

I am currently taking ivermectin liquid (injectable) orally with d3 and zinc. what is the therapeutic dosage I should take each week or month?0 Reply


Sue Reply to  Bill Coody 4 months ago

Check Google for up to date individual medical advice.-4 Reply


Don Reply to  Sue 4 months ago

Get off google! Use DuckDuckGo as search engine.6 Reply


Don Reply to  Bill Coody 4 months ago

Get off of google! Use DuckDuckGo as your search engine! Front Line Covid Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) will have you answer. They have protocols on there that you can see for your doc to use. They have docs that will overnight you an Rx for Ivermectin and I believe online pharmacies that will fill it.
Hope this helps!5 Reply


Ivermectin Stops Covid in Mexico City – CV19-cure.com Truth Cures The Pandemic of Ignorance 6 months ago

[…] COVID deaths plunge after major world city introduces … […]3 Reply


Sally Reply to  Ivermectin Stops Covid in Mexico City – CV19-cure.com Truth Cures The Pandemic of Ignorance 4 months ago

Really? https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/aug/04/facebook-posts/claim-ivermectin-bringing-down-covid-19-mortality-/2 Reply


Augustus Reply to  Sally 4 months ago

Have you researched Politifact? They are not reliable, an internet search will verify this from numerous credible sources. Not specific to this discussion, but it is related to the ‘follow the money’ or qui bono indicators.


https://aapsonline.org/covid-19-disease-hitting-a-brick-wall-in-mexico-city3 Reply


Peter Reply to  Sally 4 months ago

Really? Your reference is from the 2nd worst, phony fact-checking operation in America? You’d find more factual information written on a roll of toilet paper that what the writers at Politifact use it for.2 Reply

Alex Torres

Alex Torres Reply to  Sally 4 months ago

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33578014/1 Reply


Don Reply to  Sally 4 months ago

How cute you still believe “fact checkers on FB!4 Reply


Sue 6 months ago

Not so much.
https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-021-06348-52 Reply


vic Reply to  Sue 5 months ago

Get positive then and stay home its your choice isnt it-3 Reply


Jesse 7 months ago

Ivermectin contains the following: 5-O demethyl-22,23-dihydroavermectin A1a, 5-O-demethyl-25-de(1-methylpropyl)-22,23-dihydro-25-(1-methylethyl)avermectin A1a, generally referred to as 22,23-dihydroavermectin B1a and B1b, or H2B1a and H2B1b, respectively.

The respective empirical formulas are C48H74O14 and C47H72O14.

Anybody trust the Scientists, Liberals, and Elites with this poison pill?

Not me. My body, my choice. I will never put Ivermectin in my body. Rather than worshiping a little pill, put your faith in Jesus Christ Our Lord.-5 Reply

Jeff Evans

Jeff Evans Reply to  Jesse 5 months ago

What are you talking about? Ivermectin has been around for 60 years and is safe. The vaccines are experimental and not safe1 Reply


Jesse Reply to  Jeff Evans 5 months ago

You worship your pills. I’ll worship the Lord.-3 Reply


Augustus Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

Apparently you do not understand the definition of the word “worship”. Use is not worship. These two are not mutually exclusive. Like the old joke about the person whose home was in the path of a flood, god sent a person, a boat and helicopter, and they declined all three. When they arrived in heaven, they asked why god didn’t help them. god told them “What do you mean? I sent a car, a boat and a helicopter you dumb*ss!”0 Reply


Don Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

The Bible also says my body is a temple and I’m not supposed to desecrate it or God will destroy me! 1 Cor 3:17. The vaccine is the reason for the variants. The virus evolved. What little good it did do is no longer. Look at Israel, one of the most vaxed nations, their hospitals are ate up with vaxed people. From what I hear from docs/nurses I trust our local hospitals are overran with mostly vaxed people as well. Also look at the well known to be UNDERreported VAERS vaccine deaths. From 2000 to Dec 2020, a little over 4000 vaccine related deaths by all vaccines COMBINED. From December 2020 to date, over 13,000 vaccine deaths. And VAERS is well know to be drastically underreported! Another figure floating around is nearly 50,000 deaths since Dec 2020 and yet another figure is showing to be nearly as many deaths as the overinflated death count of the the virus. You’ll have to get on DuckDuckGo as a search engine to find this, google/safari are censoring this info. https://vaersanalysis.info/2021/08/20/vaers-summary-for-covid-19-vaccines-through-8-13-2021/2 Reply


Jesse Reply to  Jeff Evans 4 months ago

Hey Jeff Evans, this is what I’m talking about. Straight from the Conservative, Republican, Christian state of Mississippi directly addressing the real health dangers of your “safe” drug.

https://msdh.ms.gov/msdhsite/_static/resources/15400.pdf0 Reply


Don Reply to  Jeff Evans 4 months ago

I’m on your side…but Ivermectin has only been around since the late 70s. Hydroxychloroquine however has been around for over 60 years. Both work! Hydroxychloroquine need to take the Zinc with it to work. They’re both generic meds now and do not make big pharma money any longer.3 Reply


Kathie Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

You have obviously not read the ingredients (or their etiology) for the vaccination ingredients. Try it, word for word.1 Reply


Jesse Reply to  Kathie 4 months ago

Sure I have, Kathie. But what does that have to do with the poisonous ingredients in Ivermectin?-2 Reply


Don Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

Good Lord you sound completely ignorant with the words you say. Sure if Ivermectin is overdosed on, it’ll mess you up. If you overdose on Tylenol, it’ll mess you up. You sound like a mouthpiece for libs pushing the jab!3 Reply


Trainor Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

My sister and her friend got Covid and felt terrible — they got a hold of some Ivermectin and within 3 or 4 days were well. My brother lives in Tuscon, he went across the border to get it just to have on hand. I’m getting ready to order some online to be ready for an emergency. The key is to use it early on. Those downing Ivermectin keep trying to trash it by saying it’s for horses, but there an animal Ivermectin AND a human Ivermectin. Very telling is the fact that they want to ban it, and to a great extent have — it’s cheap, why not allow freedom of choice in supposedly free America? It’s safe. If you took ten times the recommended dosage, you’d just get diarrhea. Fauci and his ilk including Biden are just out for Big Pharma, that’s their priority. And hundreds of thousands have died who could still be alive.

Dr. Gina Loudon on War Room: “I know for sure, in my home state of Missouri doctors are simply not prescribing therapeutics AND PEOPLE ARE DYING because of it. I have several friends who have died in Missouri, including a great former AP reporter named Steve Walsh and others — I can cite many — and he died last week because he could not get a hold of therapeutics! And they are even doing things, the doctors that will prescribe online, BIG TECH is doing things to make even that impossible.”3 Reply


Jesse Reply to  Trainor 4 months ago

So why does the manufacturer, who has no vaccine to offer, say it doesn’t work for covid?

Wouldn’t they want to line their own pockets with huge growth from ivermectin sales?

And here’s the PART where Citizens Opinion etiquet requires me to yell OUT random words in all caps and INCLUDE RANDOM buzzwords like BIG TECH to make me sound AND look smarter than I am. Because PEOPLE ARE DYING.-7 Reply


Don Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

Once again, Merck no longer makes money from the sell of Ivermectin because it can be bought as a generic now. Merck was given millions of dollars to research and come up with a new therapeutic for covid that they can turn around and sell to more so benefit them financially. Follow the money! You look ignorant posting a pic of Ivermectin w/ a sheep on it when you haven’t done research on it. Ivermectin when taken correctly is one of the safest drugs and is on the list of essential drugs from the WHO. It is showing to not only have anti-parasite properties, but anti-viral properties as well! In 2015 it won the Nobel Prize for Medicine for curing river blindness in HUMANS not horses, cows or sheep! Do yourself a favor and ditch google and safari and get on DuckDuckGo as a search engine and you’ll find a whole different side to this story. You’ll still get the same garbage on DDG as you do google, but you’ll get the other side of the story and then you can know both sides and make an educated decision with out being a brainwashed, you guessed it, sheep!2 Reply


chris Reply to  Jesse 3 months ago

Molnupiravir2 Reply


Bob Reply to  Jesse 3 months ago

As Don notes, Merck makes way more money if IVM doesn’t work vs if it does. Ergo, Merck says it doesn’t work.

Isn’t it interesting that Merck never did a study on IVM and they choose to ignore the 63 studies that show that IVM works great.2 Reply


Don Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

Stop overdosing on it. Not stop using as directed, off label, by a doctor.2 Reply

William Hicks

William Hicks 7 months ago

Very interesting. Just combine ivermectin and natural immunity and you may have something superior to the three inoculations. Imagine that!7 Reply


Kathie Reply to  William Hicks 4 months ago

I am amazed how people will not look at the idea that our government and Big Pharma are not looking out for us but for the almighty dollar! Perhaps some of the information you are refuting is true but just not being released by the gov’t because it would hurt profits. BTW, our government is an investor in Moderna.3 Reply


Jesse Reply to  Kathie 4 months ago

You know, Kathie, Big Pharma is also looking out for the almighty dollar when they line their pockets with revenue from their “blockbuster” Ivermectin.

And that’s what the topic is in this “Opinion” piece — whether or not Ivermectin does jack for COVID.1 Reply


Don Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

Goodness Jesse you sound silly! BiG PHARMA DOES NOT MAKE MONEY FROM IVERMECTIN!!!!! Ivermectin is in generic form now. That’s why it’s original creator (Merck) is saying it does not work. It works! It just doesn’t work in making Merck any money. Merck was given millions of dollars to research a new therapeutic for coronavirus. If they come up with a new Ivermectin, THEN big pharma can make money from it.2 Reply


Jeff Reply to  Jesse 30 days ago

Dude, are you STUPID? How many times do people have to tell you Big Pharma wants to make Billions not Thousands of dollars. Merck is the same.

For all of you out there, the horse paste is safe I know. I had Covid in January 2021 (PCR & rapid +) I took to doses according to my body weight over three days and was Covid free on day 4. I had ZERO health issues. Oh, and I HAVE pre-existing health issues. Ivermectin WORKS.

Jesse, anything that is abused will kill you. Overdosing on something is dangerous, regardless if its Ivermectin, Tylenol, Alcohol, etc…

Wake up!!0 Reply


Augustus Reply to  Kathie 4 months ago

A recent article published showed that Pfizer and the others are making nearly unprecedented profits. Pfizer is making profits from the vaccine that are only second to Lipitor, apparently. See: https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/08/13/the-only-way-to-end-the-pandemic/-1 Reply


fred Reply to  William Hicks 4 months ago

Tell me why hospitalized patients given all the drugs and therapies and are still dying are given ivermectin and in 3 to 4 days walk out of the hospital.1 Reply


Don Reply to  fred 4 months ago

Bingo! I’ve seen it/read about it over and over! Why was Mexico City ate up w/ the virus Dec 2020, I mean running out of O2 after up with it and they started offering Ivermectin to everyone that tested positive and in 2 weeks time saw a reduction by 75%??? This is pre vaccine! Same story in India. People that can’t think for themselves will not find this information because they use google & safari to search. Get DuckDuckGo as a search engine and start thinking for yourself!1 Reply

William Hicks

William Hicks 7 months ago

We haave a choice to follow CDC and/or Science or politicians with an agenda of control. I choose science.

CVS pharmacy has chosen to follow political hacks, as I was refused service for not wearing a mask.-2 Reply

Dustin C

Dustin C Reply to  William Hicks 4 months ago

Unless it’s a bakery declining wedding cake services to a gay couple right?0 Reply

Gayle Washburn

Gayle Washburn 7 months ago

I am in Mexico right now. You can buy it over the counter for 101 pesos ($5 USD). for six tablets. The US media and pharma are unconscionable. But, 80% of TV/news media revenue comes from pharma companies.10 Reply

William Hicks

William Hicks Reply to  Gayle Washburn 7 months ago

Are you sure you’re getting ivermectin OTC in mexico or could it be anything else?-1 Reply


Don Reply to  William Hicks 4 months ago

Yes William you can purchase Ivermectin otc in Mexico. It’s one of the safest meds ever created when taken correctly as a doctor prescribes!0 Reply


Sally Reply to  Gayle Washburn 4 months ago

I’m told bleach is even cheaper.
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/aug/04/facebook-posts/claim-ivermectin-bringing-down-covid-19-mortality-/3 Reply


Don Reply to  Sally 4 months ago

Wow! Another silly person citing fb fact checkers! It’s cute how you still believe that garbage!4 Reply

R Jessop

R Jessop Reply to  Gayle Washburn 4 months ago

I am in Colombia, and can buy ivermectin over the counter.

I want to take it for prophylactic purposes – but cannot find the recommended dosage anywhere.

Can you help?0 Reply


Don Reply to  R Jessop 4 months ago

Check out Front Line Covid Critical Care Alliance. They have protocols to show your doctor if you have any questions. https://covid19criticalcare.com/0 Reply


COVID Deaths Plunge after Major World City Introduces Ivermectin – Counter Information 7 months ago

[…] Research, June 01, 2021WND News Center 31 May […]-2 Reply


Don Reply to  COVID Deaths Plunge after Major World City Introduces Ivermectin – Counter Information 4 months ago

Why are all these hater taping negative. Does the truth that Ivermectin saves lives hurt???1 Reply


Toni 7 months ago

The only way I’m donating money is if I can actually get the medicine this is something I’ve been trying to get an it’s not available without a doctor’s proscription sadly. If it really helps people then why is it so hard to get ? Please tell me what I need to get this. Because this article is worthless in otherwise . Smh2 Reply

Debra Goldberg

Debra Goldberg Reply to  Toni 7 months ago

You can find many telemedicine doctors to prescribe you this medicine in this directory: https://www.exstnc.com/0 Reply

BJ Mirrow

BJ Mirrow Reply to  Toni 7 months ago

The FLCCC has a chart for dosing Ivermectin. You can get Ivermectin from Tractor Supply Company, other farm supply stores or on Amazon. The animal Ivermectin, even the injectable can be taken by mouth. Bonus is that you won’t have any worms or lice!!! Not kidding. Lots of people didn’t realize they had worms. I just read research study reports from Mexico, Peru and India. Results are amazing! Ivermectin works for prevention and treatment. One testimonial was from a man they were about to put on a ventilator. He was given Ivermectin rapidly improved and went home in about 4 days!
it is hard to get because then the powers that be can scare the WORLD into taking their money making jab! Personally, I am not willing to be a lab rat!3 Reply

William Hicks

William Hicks Reply to  BJ Mirrow 7 months ago

IF ou’re buying ivermectin “over the counter”in Mexico, can you be sure you’re getting ivermectin?-1 Reply


vic Reply to  William Hicks 5 months ago

At least as sure as the Vaccine is safe and effective0 Reply


Don Reply to  William Hicks 4 months ago

Yes. It’s right next to the generic viagra.0 Reply


Don Reply to  BJ Mirrow 4 months ago

Don’t OVERDOSE! Consult your doctor & follow the FLCCC Alliance Protocol!1 Reply

Patricia Barrett

Patricia Barrett Reply to  Toni 7 months ago

My friends expensive holistic Dr., who prescribes it with an appointment, said she could tell her friends it’s OK to get it from https://homelabvet.com. your dosage is based on your wage and can be found on the FLCCC website.0 Reply

Josh A

Josh A Reply to  Toni 5 months ago

They sell it at tractor supply0 Reply


Toni 7 months ago

If it saves so many lives then why do you need a doctor to proscription to get it ? And how do we get it without a doctor’s proscription ? ? ?? Hello1 Reply

Debra Goldberg

Debra Goldberg Reply to  Toni 7 months ago

Many people (including me) use the veterinary version, it is exactly the same medicine. 6 human doses (one horse dose) cost $3.99 at Tractor Supply Company store. Or you can buy it on Amazon, here is what it looks like: https://www.amazon.com/Ivermectin-Paste-Horse-Wormer-grams/dp/B00II3L6JK-5 Reply


Josh Reply to  Debra Goldberg 7 months ago

Why chance the horse one is different than the human one when Ivermectin is readily available? As you pointed out, there are many places to get it online and they call in prescription to your local pharmacy.0 Reply


Don Reply to  Toni 4 months ago

https://covid19criticalcare.com/0 Reply

George Pattone

George Pattone 7 months ago

Uh oh!!!! Better tamp this story down because it doesn’t fit the “everybody get the RNA modification shot” narrative…

What a political s### storm….

No “orange man bad” narrative to automatically decry …4 Reply


Peter Reply to  George Pattone 7 months ago

PDF file compilation of the most important links showing that Ivermectin has been proven to both prevent (up to 92.5%) and successfully treat Covid-19 along with all the supporting scientific evidence.

Please share this information with all your friends, family, contacts, and most importantly, with the health authorities in whatever country you live, to encourage them to authorize Ivermectin for use against Covid-19.

Ivermectin for Covid-19 Prevention & Treatment:
(link will expire in 30 days)
https://ufile.io/llmrl83n-2 Reply


Jesse Reply to  Peter 7 months ago

Wow, it’s so easy. Just pop a couple Ivermectin and we’re good.

I wonder why there’s still a worldwide pandemic when the answer is so easy. Must be something Hilary is behind. She really is very, very powerful isn’t she?0 Reply


Agni Reply to  Jesse 7 months ago

Just go through the links in this updated document and you will have the answer.

Ivermectin for Covid-19 Prevention & Treatment Updated:
(link will expire in 30 days)
https://ufile.io/i9qgq5xt-1 Reply

R Jessop

R Jessop Reply to  Agni 4 months ago

Can you give me an updated link for Ivermectin recommended dosage for Covid prevention, please?0 Reply


Don Reply to  R Jessop 4 months ago

https://covid19criticalcare.com/0 Reply

Jess Pest

Jess Pest Reply to  Jesse 6 months ago

Wow…who new you could make an RNA vaccine so easy and quick never having had one before and failing multiple times for SARS-COV-1 and swine flu? Just take an experimental gene jab form fully indemnified doctors, governments and jab producers if you die, or maybe 2 jabs or 3, then wear two masks, then if one of the shots is killing people with clots just switch your second jab to another company brand which will be sure to have no issues. Covid19 must have come from bat soup or that orange man bad working as a Russian double agent yeh?2 Reply


Jesse Reply to  Jess Pest 6 months ago

So you believe the right-wing propaganda that ivermectin works? Then why are unvaccinated people still dying by the thousands?-4 Reply


Joe Reply to  Jesse 5 months ago

Because the metrics used to qualify “covid death” are being intensionally skewed, misrepresented and so badly abused that we will NEVER be able to get an honest, medically accurate toll….although WHO (and other credible scientists) have published the admission that removing “death WITH covid” from the death “FROM” covid , results in a TRUE meaningful “covid only” caused death rate of only 6% of the “media and medical oligarch” rates. ( a 94% decrease) Ever notice the rate of hospitalization is qualified as covid RELATED deaths?
Finally, censorship is only required when you can not support your position and must silence all opposition, and prevent those you have censored from defending their position. Micro clotting and damage from mRNA injections now being found in testing…Guess we will have to see 2-3 years what happens…by then it will be claimed mRNA spike death is caused is a “new virus”!
Those who have had covid have THE GOLD STANDARD of immunity, yet they want them jabbed.?WHY? New reports from vaccine maker says there is a 5-7 fold DECREASE in your natural immunity system after the jab..and thus you now REQUIRED boosters for the rest of your life…this from the makers #1 man…and he sells it like They will save you….from what they caused…gain of function coivd design is a crime against humanity..good luck…2 Reply


Don Reply to  Joe 4 months ago

You dropped the mic on that one. Too bad the sheep won’t understand a thing you just said!1 Reply

Frank Gallagher

Frank Gallagher Reply to  Jesse 5 months ago

Why are fully vaccinated people dying?-2 Reply


Jesse Reply to  Frank Gallagher 4 months ago

You mean at a far, far lower rate than unvaccinated people?0 Reply


Don Reply to  Frank Gallagher 4 months ago

I personally know of 4 completely vaxed people that have died in the last 10 days! 2 of them otherwise healthy had heart attacks. 2 had major health issues. I’d like to know that answer myself. My fear is this is only the beginning!0 Reply


Don Reply to  Frank Gallagher 4 months ago

The rate of death before the jabs was effectively 0! So what’s your point?0 Reply


Don Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

Why are the vaccinated getting the virus and dying. Check out Israel! One of the most vaxed nations and their hospitals are full! Remember to change your search engine to DuckDuckGo b/c you can’t google this stuff. They censored it!2 Reply


Firstis Reply to  Jesse 7 hours ago

that’s what the mainstream media would like us to believe. eg Google who owns YouTube, NYT, CNN, Reuters (whose chairman/ CEO James C. Smith sits on Pfizers board) etc etc. Look at the statistics from Israel, and Vermont, USA where vaccination has been at the highest levels as examples, read/watch from alternative video platforms, bitchute.com, rumble.com etc where they have gathered ample non-biased statistics so you have a more rounded picture of who is telling the truth and who just gives an appearance of the truth without really providing any evidence or details.0 Reply

Dan Volkswagen

Dan Volkswagen Reply to  Jess Pest 4 months ago

James, have you had The Jabs?
…any chance you are psychologically dependent upon promoting/supporting the Jabs since accepting the other information would be hard for you to accept?0 Reply


Don Reply to  Dan Volkswagen 4 months ago

Funny b/c it’s true!0 Reply


Don Reply to  Dan Volkswagen 4 months ago

Wow! Did you copy/paste that straight out of the dnc playbook? To think someone is, looking forward,” to getting the booster is disturbing. The “common good” is Marxism 101! It’s frightening how brainwashed you and half our nation is.0 Reply

Sen Maxine W

Sen Maxine W Reply to  Don 4 months ago

yes, the vaccine will kill, or greatly shorten the life of anyone taking it. but also notice that very few Blacks are taking the vaccine. so when all you facist Krackers die off, only the Black Race will remain.

we win0 Reply

Mike Smith

Mike Smith Reply to  Sen Maxine W 4 months ago

“yes, the vaccine will kill, or greatly shorten the life of anyone taking it. but also notice that very few Blacks are taking the vaccine. so when all you facist Krackers die off, only the Black Race will remain.

we win”

▲ ▲ ▲
| | |
| | |
| | |

This is what racism looks like, folks.1 Reply


Don Reply to  Jesse 4 months ago

Jesse!!! Follow the money. Stop being silly! In numerous articles I’ve read, it literally is that easy. People off vents 24 hours after 1st dose. Going hole days later! Here’s bit one of those articles! Enjoy!