RESEARCH: Dandelion leaf extract blocks spike proteins from binding to the ACE2 cell surface receptor

Monday, June 28, 2021 by: Lance D Johnson

(Natural News) The engineered spike proteins from SARS-CoV-2 can be STOPPED by a common “weed” that is exterminated from lawns every year. A German university study found that the common dandelion (Taraxacum officinalecan block spike proteins from binding to the ACE2 cell surface receptors in human lung and kidney cells. The water-based dandelion extract, taken from the plant’s dried leaves, was effective against spike protein D614 and a host of mutant strains, including D614G, N501Y, K417N and E484K.

Dandelion extract blocks SARS CoV-2 spike proteins and their variants

The researchers used high molecular weight compounds taken from a water-based dandelion extract and put them to the test in human HEK293-hACE2 kidney and A549-hACE2-TMPRSS2 lung cells. The dandelion blocked the protein-to-protein interactions between the S1 sub unit of the spike protein and the human ACE2 cell surface receptor. This effect was also true against the spike protein mutations from the predominant variants in circulation, including the United Kingdom (B.1.1.7), South African (B.1.351) and Brazilian (P.1) variant.

The dandelion extract stopped SARS-CoV-2 spike pseudotyped lentivirus particles from attaching to lung cells and stopped an inflammatory process called interleukin-6 secretion. Because the study was conducted in vitro, further clinical studies are needed to understand how the dandelion extract is absorbed and utilized in biological systems of the human body.

As vaccines weaken herd immunity, natural herbs promise true prevention, more substantial immunity

Even though tens of billions of public funds have been poured into experimental vaccine development and propaganda campaigns, the world continues to struggle with new respiratory infections, as SARS-CoV-2 is pressured to mutate into different variants. There is no evidence to suggest that coronaviruses can be eradicated from the Earth, so human adaptation will be essential going forward. Dandelion extract is one of many herbs that will assist in a healthy immune response. Better yet, dandelion extract could prove to prevent infections altogether, by blocking the precise channel by which the spike proteins attach and cause viral replication.

Other natural compounds have been investigated using molecular docking studies. Nobiletin is a flavonoid isolated from citrus peels. Neohesperidin, a derivative of hesperetin, is a flavanone glycoside also found in citrus fruits. Glycyrrhizin is a molecular compound extracted from licorice root. All three of these natural substances also block spike proteins from binding to ACE2 receptors. Hydroalcoholic pomegranate peel extract blocks the spike protein at the ACE2 receptor with 74 percent efficacy. When its principal constituents were tested separately, punicalagin was 64 percent effective, and ellagic acid was 36% percent effective.

These natural compounds (along with dandelion extract) can be readily mass produced, combined and deployed as preventative medicine for all future spike protein variants. These herbs are generally recognized as safe, and there are no known cases of overdose with dandelion leaf extract. According to the European Scientific Cooperative on Phytotherapy, the recommended dosage of dandelion leaf is 4–10 grams steeped in hot water, up to three times per day.

The study authors warn that reliance on vaccines is risky and dangerous, not just for individual health but also for herd immunity. Vaccine reliance only focuses on antibody augmentation and is proving to be a high-risk intervention with short term results. Vaccine injuries are frequently reported. Re-infections post vaccination are also common, as the vaccine puts pressure on the original engineered spike protein to mutate.

The authors conclude: “Thus, factors such as low toxicity in humans and effective binding inhibition of five relevant spike mutations to the human ACE2 receptor, as reported here in vitro, encourage for more in-depth analysis of T. officinales’ effectiveness in SARS-CoV-2 prevention and now requires further confirmatory clinical evidence.”

Sources include:

Amazon Show Plot: Fake Virus And Global Vaccine Program To Sterilize World Population

HAFHAF June 24, 2021

An Amazon series released at the height of the COVID pandemic revolved around a plot where a virus is deliberately released and then a vaccine offered to a terrified public as a form of population control.

by Paul Joseph Watsonamazon show plot fake virus and global vaccine program to sterilize world population

Video screenshot

Utopia is a remake of the UK Channel 4 series originally released in 2013 and stars Jessica Rothe, Rainn Wilson, and John Cusack.

Alex Jones breaks down the significance of the 2020 Amazon series ‘Utiopia.’ The series, that finished shooting long before Covid-19 hysteria, involves a mad scientist who creates a fake pandemic and offers a vaccine “cure” that is actually a sterilizing bioweapon. This is real-time predictive programming!

The plot centers on a group of comic book fans who discover an unpublished manuscript for a graphic novel which turns out to be a real life plot to fake a global pandemic in order to thin the earth’s population.

People are killed or poisoned to convince them that the virus is real before a traumatized population is convinced to take a vaccine which sterilizes the vast majority of them, lowering the planet’s population to just 500 million people total in a single generation.

The comic book fans are hunted down by a shadowy deep state organization after attempting to expose the conspiracy.

The edit of Utopia was only finished in April 2020 at the height of the first wave of the pandemic and was subsequently released in September 2020.

Indeed, the plot of the series is so close to what some “conspiracy theorists” claim is the real agenda behind the COVID-19 pandemic, that outlets like Slate said it should have never been released.

“It’s impossible to enjoy a story where the heroes persuade themselves that shadowy forces have manufactured a phony pandemic to trick people into taking a dangerous vaccine when those exact beliefs are helping to kill hundreds of thousands of Americans,” wrote Matthew Dessem.

The New York Times also reported on how author and showrunner Gillian Flynn knew that Utopia had “unsettling COVID parallels,” but that she wrote it before she knew anything about QAnon.

Suffice to say, the show was canceled in November 2020 after Amazon opted not to commission a second season.

Maybe it was just too close to the bone.

Missouri Tells the Feds: We Won’t Enforce Your Gun Laws

Mises Institute:

06/21/2021Ryan McMaken

On June 12, Missouri governor Mike Parson signed HB 85, the “Second Amendment Preservation Act” recently approved by the state’s legislature.

The new law is designed to prevent state and local law enforcement from enforcing federal laws regulating private ownership of firearms.

The act

Declares that all federal acts, laws, executive orders, administrative orders, court orders, rules, and regulations, whether past, present, or future, that infringe on the people’s right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 23 of the Missouri Constitution must be invalid in this state, including those that impose a tax, levy, fee, or stamp on these items as specified in the bill; require the registration or tracking of these items or their owners; prohibit the possession, ownership, use, or transfer of a firearm; or order the confiscation of these items

Moreover, the act opens up law enforcement officials and other state personnel to legal penalties if they do enforce federal firearms laws and

[s]pecifies that any entity or person who knowingly acts under the color of any federal or state law to deprive a Missouri citizen of the rights or privileges ensured by the federal and state constitutions to keep and bear arms must be liable to the injured party for redress, including monetary damages in the amount of $50,000 per occurrence and injunctive relief. … Sovereign immunity shall not be a defense.

Basically, the law attempts to do two different things. The first is to declare certain federal laws invalid within the state.

The second is to state that police are prohibited from providing “material aid and support” to federal officials seeking to prosecute Missouri residents under federal gun laws.

The first aspect of the legislation is on shaky ground. The second aspect, however, has the potential to have a real effect on the enforcement of federal gun laws in the state.

States Can’t Invalidate Federal Laws, But They Don’t Have to Help Enforce Them

Naturally, gun control advocates and opponents of decentralization have condemned the bill, mostly on grounds of the legal doctrines and federal preemption and federal supremacy.

But this only applies to the part of the bill claiming to invalidate federal law. National Public Radio, for instance quotes law professor Stephen Vladeck, who states: “If I am a resident of Missouri, I am no less subject to federal gun laws today than [before the law was passed].”

This is true enough in the strict legal sense. Federal gun laws have not actually been repealed in Missouri, and the federal government can still draw upon its own resources to attempt to enforce these laws within the state.

On the other hand, by directing state officials to not enforce federal laws in the state, the new act makes it more difficult to enforce federal law and deprives the federal government of resources it has long assumed it could call upon whenever it wanted. After all, the federal government has long regarded state and local police as “valuable partners” who act as informants and who provide personnel, firepower, jails, and other amenities that make it easier for federal officials to arrest and prosecute locals.

If the new Missouri legislation truly leads to a situation in which federal officials can’t count on any state or local manpower, this will mean a de facto decline in the ability of federal officials to enforce federal law in the state.

This is not unprecedented. During the 1850s, for example, state governments passed laws prohibiting state officials from assisting federal agents who sought to enforce the federal fugitive slave acts.

The Lessons We Learned from State Marijuana Legalization

But there is a much more recent example that we can look to to better understand Missouri’s new law.

We have seen this tactic at work already in the realm of federal marijuana laws.

For example, when Colorado voters approved Amendment 64, which legalized recreational marijuana in the state, the result, in practice, was something similar to what Missouri is attempting.

Amendment 64 declared marijuana to be legal in the state under a broad variety of circumstances, and the text of the amendment simply stated that marijuana would be legal for people in Colorado over twenty-one years of age.

This invalidated state and local laws outlawing marijuana. Of course, marijuana continued to be illegal under federal law, and federal officials were free to enter the state and prosecute business owners and individuals who owned, bought, and sold marijuana.

And yet this rarely happened. There were some efforts—and numerous threats—by federal officials to “crack down” on locals in Colorado, but these efforts proved to be anemic.

It should be noted that the Colorado amendment (and enacting legislation) was in fact much more mild than the Missouri legislation. The amendment did not explicitly prohibit state officials from cooperating with federal officials. But the result in practice was similar. State and local law enforcement backed off substantially from all enforcement efforts, and federal law came to be seen as an alien force working contrary to the interests of policymakers of both parties. Colorado members of Congress (from both parties) introduced and supported legislation seeking to limiting federal enforcement of marijuana laws in Colorado or in states that had legalized the use and possession of marijuana.

Moreover, when it was thought that the Trump administration might finally “crack down” on Coloradans using marijuana, state legislators did introduce legislation specifically prohibiting state officials from cooperating with federal officials in “Arresting a Colorado citizen or person lawfully present in Colorado for committing an act in Colorado that is a Colorado constitutional right.” (This legislation passed the House but failed in the Senate).

Today, federal marijuana prohibitions and enforcement in Colorado have been significantly limited and scaled back.

Public Opinion Matters

Part of the reason marijuana legalization at the state level has worked so well in pushing back against federal law is that public opinion is on the side of legalization. As more and more states moved to legalize marijuana, it became clear that the public in general and many members of Congress had little interest in really pressing the issue.

That is, cracking down on marijuana users apparently just didn’t have much of a national support base. Congress and the White House have been unwilling to legalize marijuana, but they have also apparently also been unwilling to push the issue.

State-level moves to legalize marijuana have not made federal law “invalid” in any de jure sense. But they have gone a long way toward doing so in practice. 

Can Opponents of Federal Gun Laws Copy the Colorado Strategy?

Can Missouri succeed in the way efforts to legalize marijuana have succeeded through state legalization?

This will depend on both public opinion and the willingness of other state governments to join in.

Other states must take similar steps just as other states joined Colorado. As Alaska, California, Washington, Massachusetts, and other states joined Colorado in legalizing marijuana, this made it all the more clear to federal law enforcement agencies that they shouldn’t expect a groundswell of support should they decide to show the state governments who’s boss.

Only after several states—ideally including politically powerful states like Florida and Texas—start to line up on the side of state autonomy in gun legislation will we know if there is enough political will to cripple federal enforcement as has happened with marijuana.

In other words, states’ efforts to end federal enforcement within their borders are as much a political effort as they are a legal one. Legal scholars can talk about the supremacy clause and federal preemption until they’re blue in the face, but it’s political trends and public opinion that will ultimately decide the outcome. 

Because public opinion in so many states has been trending in the direction of marijuana legalization, neither the federal courts nor the White House have been willing to press the issue of forcing federal “supremacy.”

Another lesson of the Colorado marijuana strategy is this: meaningful reform began at the state level and indirectly forced the hand of federal officials. It was only after states began saying, “We’re not going to do what the federal government wants,” that Congress and federal agencies began to lose their nerve to force these federal regulations on states. In other words, the political strategy of effectively ignoring and essentially nullifying federal marijuana laws has clearly been effective. Whether or not opponents of federal gun laws can find similar success with this strategy remains to be seen.Author:

Contact Ryan McMaken

Ryan McMaken (@ryanmcmaken) is a senior editor at the Mises Institute. Send him your article submissions for the Mises Wire and Power&Market, but read article guidelines first. Ryan has degrees in economics and political science from the University of Colorado and was a housing economist for the State of Colorado. He is the author of Commie Cowboys: The Bourgeoisie and the Nation-State in the Western Genre.

CDC to hold emergency meeting following reports linking mRNA vaccines to heart inflammation

Tuesday, June 22, 2021 by: Nolan Barton

(Natural News) The vaccine advisory group of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) planned to hold an emergency meeting on June 18 to discuss reports of heart inflammation in young individuals following a second dose of the Pfizer and Moderna coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines.

Formally known as the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the group makes recommendations on how to use vaccines to control diseases in the U.S. The recommendations are nonbinding but the CDC often takes the recommended action. ACIP meetings are open to the public and committee documents are publicly available, ensuring transparency in decision-making.

According to the meeting agenda, the first portion of the meeting was to feature an update on COVID-19 vaccine safety, which covers myocarditis cases seen after the administration of vaccines built on messenger RNA technology.

Myocarditis is a condition that involves inflammation of the heart muscle. Symptoms can include fever and fatigue, as well as shortness of breath and a very specific type of chest pain. Patients tend to say their chest hurts more when they lean forward. The pain tends to subside when they lean back.

Americans as young as 12 develop myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination

Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, deputy director of CDC’s Immunization Safety Office, said during a June 10 presentation to the vaccine advisory group of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that there have been 226 confirmed cases of myocarditis after vaccination among Americans younger than 30, and that 250 more cases are under investigation.

Shimabukuro said the CDC will continue to evaluate myocarditis cases following vaccination and assess the benefits and risks of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, which both use mRNA technology, ahead of the emergency meeting.

Those between ages 12 and 24 accounted for more than half of the myocarditis cases in people below 30 that have been reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), despite representing just a fraction of people who have received the vaccines. (Related: Dr. Zelenko: Covid vaccine mandates for children are “coercive human experimentation, crimes against humanity.”)

“We clearly have an imbalance there,” Shimabukuro said.

According to Shimabukuro, not all of the reports submitted to VAERS will turn out to be accurate. But he added that the higher-than-expected rate of the myocarditis cases among Americans below 30 is consistent with the data from Israel.

Israel’s Ministry of Health identified over 200 cases in men between 16 and 30 years old, a vast majority of those happening at the younger end of that range. That equates to a risk of between 1 in 3,000 and 1 in 6,000 of suffering from myocarditis.

Members of FDA’s vaccine advisory group express concerns about the myocarditis data

Members of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, to whom Shimabukuro made his presentation, expressed concerns about the myocarditis data.

“Because we’ve all discussed at fair length the concern about myocarditis and other side effects, which seem to generally be worse after the second dose, I think we need some studies on single dose and whether that might be adequate going forward,” Dr. Mark Sawyer, professor of pediatrics at the University of California, San Diego, told colleagues during the meeting.

“I think the myocarditis is something that needs to be looked at closely because we’re likely seeing the tip of the iceberg,” added Dr. Michael Kurilla, director of the Division of Clinical Innovation at the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, which is part of the National Institutes of Health.

Pfizer said it supports the CDC’s assessment of the heart inflammation cases, noting that “the number of reports is small given the number of doses administered.”

The FDA expanded Pfizer’s emergency use authorization to include children as young as 12, even though the pharmaceutical company’s own clinical trials of the vaccine showed disturbing effects on young people.

Pfizer gave the vaccines to one group of children between ages 12 and 15 while another group got a placebo. Among children who received just the first dose of the vaccine, rates of serious symptoms were higher across the board – including symptoms consistent with myocarditis.

COVID-19 vaccine for infants may be available in fall

The New York Times reported that COVID-19 vaccines may be available in the fall for American children as young as six months. Pfizer announced on June 8 that it was moving to test its vaccine in children between ages 5 and 12. It will begin testing the vaccine in infants in the next few weeks. (Related: Children must not be vaccinated for COVID-19.)

Compared with adults, children are much less likely to develop severe illness following infection with COVID-19. But nearly four million children in the U.S. have tested positive for the virus since the start of the pandemic, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Marquette County Health Department Medical Director Dr. Robert Lorinser, also a family practice physician, said that until more concrete science is provided, the vaccines should still be administered to everyone they are authorized for.

Dr. Monica Gandhi, professor of medicine and associate chief at the University of California, San Francisco, told the Epoch Times in an email that the CDC could end up recommending only vaccinating children who have not recovered from COVID-19 because there is a link between COVID infection and myocarditis.

Other possibilities mentioned by Gandhi include giving a single dose of the Moderna or Pfizer shots to those under the age of 20, lowering the dosage amount and extending the duration between doses one and two in the young.

Follow for more news and information related to coronavirus vaccines.

Sources include:

Previous :Petition seeking to prevent Jeff Bezos from returning to Earth surpasses 20,000 signatures

Vaccinated people found to be 600% more likely to die from covid “variants” than unvaccinated people

uesday, June 22, 2021 by: Ethan Huff

(Natural News) Those who have been injected for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) are greater than six times more likely to die from a circulating “variant” like “Delta” than are unvaccinated people who just say no to strange experimental drugs from Tony Fauci and the government.

New data published by Public Health England on Friday found that compared to non-jabbed people, those who took the poison for the Chinese Virus are far more likely to suffer an excruciating death upon exposure to one of the many Wuhan Flu variants that the media says are spreading.

As it turns out, experimental gene therapy chemicals make the human immune system more prone to sudden death upon exposure to Chinese Germs than if that immune system was simply left alone to do its job naturally without pharmaceutical interventions.

Entitled, “SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation in England, Technical briefing 16,” a paper covering the data shows that Chinese Virus variants are pretty much a non-issue to begin with, as the vast majority of people who encounter them never even know it.

The minute few who do end up dying with a variant more than likely already had the shot, research shows. The even more minute few who did not get the shot and still end up dying after testing “positive” more than likely had a weakened immune system or some other health problem such as heart disease or obesity.

Most people have a zero percent chance of dying from a Chinese Virus “variant”

Public Health England even admits that the risk of dying with a Chinese Virus variant is exceptionally low, especially if a person has not received the jab. Those who do take the jab are much more likely to suffer and die, it turns out, which apparently comes with the territory when trying to stay “safe.”

Even so, the fake news media is ratcheting up the propaganda about the spread of variants, calling it the fifth or sixth or whatever “wave” we are on now, all the while urging the public to get injected as many times as necessary to “flatten the curve.”

Despite the fact that the injections are now known to be spreading the variants, the lying news media is hoping that most people have very short-term memories and will forget the truth out of fear that they might once again test positive for the Wuhan Flu.

In addition to higher death rates, vaccinated people who test positive for a variant are more likely than the unvaccinated to require hospitalization for their Chinese cold.

According to the latest data, a full 2.0 percent of vaccinated people who test positive for the Delta variant require emergency care, compared to only 1.48 percent of unvaccinated people.

“The current data is in keeping with data published last week by England’s public health agency that also showed a six-times greater death rate among the fully vaccinated than the unvaccinated and a hospital admission rate of 2.3 percent among those fully vaccinated at least two weeks earlier compared with just 1.2 percent among the unvaccinated,” further explains Celeste McGovern from LifeSiteNews.

All of this is only verifying what Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) research Stephanie Seneff warned about antibody-dependent enhancement, or ADE, which is basically vaccine-induced immune damage that makes a person more prone to getting sick.

“It is conceivable to me that the laser-beam specificity of the induced antibodies is offset by a general weakening of innate immunity,” Seneff says.

“I also suspect that massive vaccination campaigns may accelerate the rate at which the vaccine-resistant mutant strains become dominant among all the SARS-Co-V2 [coronavirus] strains.”

To keep up with the latest nonsense about Chinese Virus “variants,” be sure to check out

Sources for this article include:


Reblog with permission from Lada Ray:


Perfect infotainment! Lada, your webinars aren’t only informative and fact-based but also entertaining, intriguing and full of suspense! Can’t get enough and looking forward to the next! ~ 1EarthUnited

**View this video on YouTube!


Go here:





_____________ – all webinars, teachings and more!




Explore all Series 5 webinars:






Go to for




​​SERIES 5 RUSSIA, EURASIA & GREAT REBALANCING!–great-rebalancing.html


​SERIES 3 ​COVID-19 CATALYST ​& 2020-2026 PREDICTIONS–2020-2026-predictions.html

SERIES 2 ​FORBIDDEN HISTORY & FORGOTTEN ORIGINS–forgotten-origins-series-esw7-10.html







LADA’S WORK – teachings, freebies, etc.!

**LADA RAY ADVANCED COMMUNITY (Patreon) Regular exclusive, advanced content, new ideas and predictions, perks, gifts and major discounts!


Four British Airway pilots DIE in the same week, just days after getting second covid shot

Sunday, June 20, 2021 by: Lance D Johnson

….. I’m sure these deaths are purely coincidental 😉

(Natural News) A heartbreaking photo is circulating online. The photo shows four British Airway pilots memorialized in framed pictures that are propped up beside four books of condolence. A Reuters fact check just authenticated the picture and confirmed that the four British Airways pilots DIED in the same week, just days after getting a second covid shot. The Reuters fact checker attempts to debunk the link between the deaths and the vaccines after a spokesperson from British Airways tweeted that the four deaths are not linked.

Reuters reached out to British Airways and “confirms” that the pilot fatalities are not connected to the vaccine. “Sadly four members of our pilot community passed away recently,” said Julie from British Airways. “Our thoughts are with their family and friends. However, there is no truth whatsoever in the claims on social media speculating that the four deaths are linked.”

Reuters used this tweet to confirm that the vaccines did not play a role in the pilots’ deaths. Apparently, Reuters, the know-all fact checker, has received exclusive access to the four pilots’ medical records. Apparently, Reuters also has absolute medical authority to analyze each pilot’s unique situation and make an official declaration on their death, just a week after their passing.

Why are so many young people dying of unexplained causes?

With all the safety protocols and contact tracing in place, how come the public health authorities were unable to prevent these premature deaths? The four airline pilots were young and in good health, so what could have caused them all to die in the same week? Why are vaccinated people dying so young if they are “protected?”

In March 2021, British Airway’s chief executive officer, Sean Doyle, said, “I think people who’ve been vaccinated should be able to travel without restriction.” How can vaccinated people travel without restriction if the vaccine causes real life physical restrictions such as hospitalization, disability and death? From blood clots to facial paralysis to inflammation of the heart: The vaccinated group in this live experiment are facing real-life health restrictions. But out of fear of losing their job, many people are succumbing to this mental and physical abuse just to comply with coercive, rights-stripping company policies.

British Airways wants to give vaccinated “preferential treatment” but can’t even keep their own vaccinated pilots alive

How can people travel at all or trust the process if pilots are dying left and right? British Airway’s internal policy already requires pilots and other crew members to take part in the experimental, spike protein inoculation process. Up to 80 percent of the pilots and crew have received these spike protein-producing injections.

Mr. Doyle has called on Britain to work with other governments to mandate a digital vaccine and covid testing passport system. British Airways began using a Verifly Mobile Health Passport for flights traveling between London and the US. This discriminatory app gives preferential treatment to the vaccinated and “fast-tracks” them to designated check-in desks, while forcing unvaccinated subjects to surrender their medical privacy, give up their due process rights, and produce a negative covid-19 test as a precondition to their liberty. In their effort to discriminate against non-compliant “anti-vaxxers,” British Airways wants to give vaccinated passengers “preferential treatment,” but can’t even keep their own vaccinated pilots alive.

Why are vaccinated people receiving preferential treatment at all if they continue to test positive for covid and are at greater risk of sudden blood clots, neurological dysfunction, seizures, brain bleed and aneurysm? How can the general population depend on these weakened, susceptible leaders, especially if these “leaders” are in charge of flying a commercial plane?

Sources include:

Previous :A New York pop-up clinic used EXPIRED covid vaccines, demands hundreds of victims return for follow-up dose

Politician wants to alter the moon’s orbit to fight Climate Change

Umm, with “leaders” like these, what could possibly go wrong?

June 18, 2021
Cancun, MexicoAre you ready for this week’s absurdity? Here’s our Friday roll-up of the most ridiculous stories from around the world that are threats to your liberty, risks to your prosperity… and on occasion, inspiring poetic justice.Twitter Censored Users at the Request of the StateThe National Association of State Election Directors, and the Secretary of State of Massachusetts, are being sued for partnering with Twitter to censor critics of the state.State election officials developed a system to assess the “threat level” of speech critical of them, or any comments that expressed skepticism of election security.Then they struck a deal in which Twitter agreed to delete Tweets, and ban users, at the request of government officials.The court documents make clear that Twitter attempted to insulate the state actors from the censorship, instead operating under the guise that Twitter’s internal moderators had found the content violated its terms.It’s one thing for a private company to trample free speech. But when the government does it, that clearly violates the constitution.Click here to read the court documents.Congressman: Can we alter the moon’s orbit for climate change?In a recent webcam Congressional hearing, Texas Rep Louie Gohmert asked an associate deputy chief of the Forest Service if her agency could alter the moon’s orbit to address climate change.Gohmert said:”I was informed by the immediate past director of NASA that they’ve found that the moon’s orbit is changing slightly and so is the Earth’s orbit around the sun… [I]s there anything that the National Forest Service or [Bureau of Land Management] can do to change the course of the moon’s orbit or the Earth’s orbit around the sun?”She smiled and politely said, “I would have to follow up with you on that one Mr. Gohmert.”She was holding back laughter, but Gohmert was dead serious. He responded, “Well, if you figure out a way that you in the Forest Service could make that change, I’d like to know.”Click here to see the video.World leaders ignore their own Covid rules at G7 SummitDue to Covid-19, it is currently illegal in the UK to hold an outdoor gathering with more than 30 people in attendance.But those rules are just for the peasants.World leaders such as Joe Biden, Boris Johnson, Angela Merkel, Justin Trudeau and others met in the UK last weekend to discuss how to further destroy humanity’s future, or something along those lines.For their first photo opp, they arranged themselves nice and socially distanced on an outdoor stage.However when the barbecue commenced, the world leaders were photographed without masks, failing to social distance. And yes, there were more than 30 people in attendance.When asked about the hypocrisy, the UK’s foreign secretary said, “It’s outside, it’s very well ventilated on the beach…. I think that we’ve gone well beyond and above in making sure this was COVID secure.”Funny… that was no excuse for the little people who wanted to attend church on Easter Sunday or the funeral of a loved one.To add insult to injury Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced after the summit that further reopening in the UK would be delayed because of an increase in cases.Click here to read the full story.Up to half of all unemployment benefits are being stolenAccording to a fraud monitoring service, up to half of the unemployment benefits handed out over the past year were stolen by fraudsters.That could amount to $400 billion of taxpayers’ money robbed. Of the stolen funds, about 70% left the country.And these were not one-off crimes— the funds largely went to gangs and organized criminals.That used to be rare, because stealing unemployment benefits was not seen as lucrative enough for organized criminals. But as lockdowns spiked last year and people lost their jobs, the opening flood gates of unemployment funds became alluring to criminals.Between initial unemployment claims and Pandemic Unemployment Assistance, it would appear that 110 million Americans were laid off in the past year… out of a total workforce of 150 million.That doesn’t add up. And neither does the fact that 15.2 million people are still collecting unemployment, while only 8.8 million are currently unemployed.Click here to read the full story.To your freedom,
Simon Black,

National security apparatus in total panic over election audit results, rising backlash against tyranny and corruption

Latest conspiracy theory reveals Trump replacing Biden, being installed back into office! Read on and enjoy the laugh…

Thursday, June 17, 2021 by: Mike Adams

(Natural News) The national security “deep state” is in an outright panic right now, desperately hoping to criminalize political opponents of the Biden regime before the results of the Arizona / Maricopa County ballot audit are revealed. The hand counting portion of the audit is now complete, and final results are expected in as little as ten days (around June 26th).

Corrupt national security operators know that once the audit results are made public, America will see that around 200,000 ballots are either fraudulent or missing, and Arizona will move to decertify its electoral college votes, thrusting the entire Biden “victory” into question. With audit efforts spreading to other states, it won’t be long before enough states decertify the electoral votes to push Biden below the electoral victory threshold of 270, effectively nullifying the Biden “presidency.”

In order to stop that from happening, it appears the corrupt DOJ and FBI are plotting the largest false flag event in American history as a way to terrorize the nation into obedience while distracting from election audit results. In the same way that the Jan. 6th capitol siege — which was clearly run by the FBI — instantly shut down all talk of US Senators even considering alternate electoral college votes submitted by many red states, the deep state knows that rolling out a massive false flag attack as the Arizona election results are released will drastically shift the narrative and focus the American people on media-induced hatred aimed at conservatives and gun owners.

This is why we expect to see the deep state attempt to pull off a large-scale mass shooting or bombing event of some kind, either in June or July, followed by media hysteria and a demand for nationwide gun confiscation and national security investigations into Trump supporters. In order for the Marxists to hold power, they must create a new crisis and use it to strip away any remaining constitutional protections from the American people.

They’ve already destroyed free speech and free elections; now they must destroy the freedom to bear arms and the freedom to express dissent via the First Amendment.

As Darren Beattie of now asks, “Does the national security apparatus do anything but conspire against the American people?”

Hear the full update here, also covering insane news headlines, political news, vaccines and more:

Find a new podcast each weekday at

Previous :LIGHTS OUT: Cyber strike against America’s power grid and energy infrastructure seeks to take down the nation and sow chaos so that bad actors can cover their tracks