Real Revolution Means Expanding Consciousness, Both Outwardly And Inwardly

By Caitlin Johnstone

June 30, 2020 “Information Clearing House” – The fight to liberate humanity from oppression, exploitation, butchery and madness is really a fight to expand consciousness.

The existential threats our species now faces are ultimately due to the fact that powerful people advance omnicidal, ecocidal, oppressive, violent and exploitative agendas behind veils of secrecy and propaganda distortion. They do evil things while deliberately keeping people unconscious of those evil things, so that the people will not use the power of their numbers to stop them.

The people do not use the power of their numbers to force a change into a healthy paradigm which puts human interests first because their perception of the world is aggressively manipulated by power structures who have a vested interest in keeping that from happening. Wealth and power are kept in the hands of elites and their underlings by propagandizing people into believing the current status quo is the only way things can be. War agendas are consented to because people are propagandized into believing this or that boogie man poses some imminent threat and needs to be eliminated. Surveillance, censorship, government secrecy and police militarization are tolerated because people are manipulated into believing they need these things.

And so on. In all cases, the key carrying agent for all of these toxic agendas is unconsciousness. If people were conscious of the real nature of these agendas and how badly they’re being robbed in order to advance them, they would refuse to consent to them and force them to stop. So they are kept unconscious of their reality by perceptual manipulation like propaganda, government opacity, internet censorship, and the war on adversarial journalism.

The fight against these malignant power structures is therefore a fight to increase public awareness of their toxic agendas, and of the perceptual manipulation tactics which are being used to prevent that awareness from being spread. It’s a fight to expand collective human consciousness of what’s really going on in the world.

Are You Tired Of The Lies And Non-Stop Propaganda?

Get Your FREE Daily Newsletter

No Advertising – No Government Grants – This Is Independent Media

But unconsciousness of abusive power structures and their perception manipulation tactics are not the only way in which humanity is unconscious. In exactly the same way that we are collectively unconscious of the reality of external events, we are individually unconscious of the reality of internal events as well.

Generally speaking, humans are confused about the nature of experience and their thoughts and actions are largely governed by unconscious conditioning patterns. Rather than experiencing life as it actually shows up, we tend to experience it through layers of mental narratives about what’s really going on which distort our ability to experience things lucidly.

Becoming conscious of your inner world brings clarity to your internal dynamics in exactly the same way that becoming conscious of your external world brings clarity to world dynamics: you are able to see what’s really happening. This can take the form of realizing unhelpful thought patterns in yourself which had been subconsciously running on autopilot your whole life, or unhelpful beliefs about yourself that you formed in early childhood and came to take for granted.

If you take the inward expansion of consciousness even further, you can come to see that the thing you’ve always thought of as “you” is actually a misperception based on a faulty assumption about the nature of experience, and your true self is more accurately described as a boundless field of space-like awareness to which no mental narratives can apply. But you need to become fully conscious of the fact that this is what’s really happening before it–and the peace and lucidity which comes with it–can be your lived experience.

The inward and outward expansions of consciousness exist on the same continuum, and neither is more important or more valuable than the other. People who are more interested in politics and government might see the exploration of the inner dimensions as airy fairy bullshit, and people who are more interested in spirituality and enlightenment might see the exploration of international power dynamics as deluded nonsense for muggles.

But objectively they hold the same value. Someone engaged in relentlessly honest self-enquiry is doing something that is just as valuable as someone who is engaged in investigative journalism. Going to therapy and having transformative personal breakthroughs is as valuable as making a viral video exposing the reality of police brutality. All expand consciousness, so all are facilitating the revolution.

In this particular sense, there’s no fundamental difference between someone like Julian Assange and someone like Eckhart Tolle. You might object that one of these men is in prison and the other is enjoying what appears to be a fairly cushy and unmolested life, but there’s a reason for that: our rulers don’t understand just how threatening the expansion of inner consciousness is to their empire. If they did, old Eckhart would be rotting in a prison cell just like Julian.

Sociopaths don’t understand the inner dimensions. They don’t really have the cognitive software for it. They have an acute understanding of how to manipulate language and information in order to get what they want, but the notion of honest introspection with the goal of truth for truth’s sake is wholly alien for them. Someone who sees the world as a field of potential assets to be exploited will never think to look inside themselves and consider how they might be misinterpreting reality, but they will see attempts to interfere with their toxic agendas in the world as direct threats to their ability to get what they want. Which is why Julian Assange is in prison and Eckhart Tolle is not.

This inability to perceive the other half of the revolution will be their undoing. It is our ace in the hole.

Because it turns out that expanding one’s consciousness inwardly greatly enhances one’s ability to expand consciousness outwardly. Once you succeed in loosening the grip of mental narrative upon your experience, you become much more difficult to propagandize and much more adept at noticing narrative manipulation. Propaganda relies on people buying into their narratives, as well as fear and greed, to effectively manipulate public perception. Someone who is inwardly very lucid will have none of these hooks, and will have a much easier time becoming conscious of the outer world if they choose to do so.

For this reason, the most effective rebels in this revolution engage in both inner work and in outer work. They fight the revolution on both fronts, which instead of dividing their effectiveness actually makes them more effective at both. Honoring the reality of both humanity’s inward and outward adventures helps bring clarity to each of them.

The sociopaths who rule our society are only capable of fighting us on one front, while we appear to be gaining ground on the other. The phenomenon commonly known as spiritual enlightenment appears to be becoming more and more common (Tolle again repeated his belief that this is the case in a recent interview with Russell Brand), and if you’re paying attention you’ll see other unusual phenomena emerging in the collective consciousness as well. Consciousness is rapidly expanding of economic injustice, racial injustice, police militarization etc, and we can expect it to keep expanding into other dynamics in the same way.

The lights are turning on everywhere, more and more abusive and unwholesome dynamics are being brought into consciousness around the world, and it’s only a matter of time before we collectively cough up the whole disgusting furball and move together into a healthy and harmonious world.

Caitlin’s articles are entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking her on Facebook, following her antics on Twitter, checking out her podcast, throwing some money into her hat on Patreon or Paypalor buying her book Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.

Post your comment below

See also

Caitlin Johnstone: Only Idiots Believe The CIA

To Keep Russiagate Alive ‘Officials’ Make New Claims Without Providing Evidence

By Moon Of Alabama

June 30, 2020 “Information Clearing House” – There were allegations about emails that someone exfiltrated from the DNC and provided to Wikileaks. Russia must have done it. The FBI and other intelligence services were all over it. In the end no evidence was provided to support the claims.

There were allegations that Trump did not really win the elections. Russia must have done it. The various U.S. intelligence service, together with their British friends, provided all kinds of sinister leaks about the alleged case. In the end no evidence was provided to support the claims.

A British double agent, Sergej Skirpal, was allegedly injured in a Russian attack on him. The intelligence services told all kind of contradicting nonsense about the case. In the end no evidence was provided to support the claims.

All three cases had two points in common. The were based on sources near to the U.S. and British intelligence community. They were designed to increase hostility against Russia. The last point was then used to sabotage Donald Trump’s original plans for better relations with Russia.

Now the intelligence services make another claim that fits right into the above scheme.

Are You Tired Of The Lies And Non-Stop Propaganda?

Get Your FREE Daily Newsletter

No Advertising – No Government Grants – This Is Independent Media

Reporters from the New York Times and the Washington Post were called up by unnamed ‘officials’ and told to write that Russia pays some Afghans to kill U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan. There is zero evidence that the claim is true. The Taliban spokesman denies it. The numbers of U.S. soldiers killed in Afghanistan is minimal. The alleged sources of the claims are criminals the U.S. has taken as prisoners in Afghanistan.

All that nonsense is again used to press against Trump’s wish for better relations with Russia. Imagine – Trump was told about these nonsensical claims and he did nothing about it!

The same intelligence services and ‘officials’ previously paid bounties to bring innocent prisoners to Guantanamo Bay, tortured them until they made false confessions and lied about it. The same intelligence services and ‘officials’ lied about WMD in Iraq. The same ‘intelligence officials’ paid and pay Jihadis disguised as ‘Syrian rebels’ to kill Russian and Syrian troops which defend their countries.

The journalistic standards at the New York Times and Washington Post must be below zero to publish such nonsense without requesting real evidence. The press release like stories below from anti-Trump/anti-Russian sources have nothing to do with ‘great reporting‘ but are pure stenography.

The New York Times:

Russia Secretly Offered Afghan Militants Bounties to Kill U.S. Troops, Intelligence Says

American intelligence officials have concluded that a Russian military intelligence unit secretly offered bounties to Taliban-linked militants for killing coalition forces in Afghanistan — including targeting American troops — amid the peace talks to end the long-running war there, according to officials briefed on the matter.

The officials familiar with the intelligence did not explain the White House delay in deciding how to respond to the intelligence about Russia.

While some of his closest advisers, like Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, have counseled more hawkish policies toward Russia, Mr. Trump has adopted an accommodating stance toward Moscow.

The intelligence assessment is said to be based at least in part on interrogations of captured Afghan militants and criminals.

The Washington Post:

Russian operation targeted coalition troops in Afghanistan, intelligence finds

A Russian military spy unit offered bounties to Taliban-linked militants to attack coalition forces in Afghanistan, including U.S. and British troops, in a striking escalation of the Kremlin’s hostility toward the United States, American intelligence has found.

The Russian operation, first reported by the New York Times, has generated an intense debate within the Trump administration about how best to respond to a troubling new tactic by a nation that most U.S. officials regard as a potential foe but that President Trump has frequently embraced as a friend, said the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive intelligence matter.

The unit that officials identified as responsible for allegedly offering the bounties has also been linked to the poisoning and attempted murder of former Russian military spy Sergei Skripal in Britain in 2018.

– Source –

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.

Post your comment below

See also

Afghanistan War Exposed: An Imperial Conspiracy

Caitlin Johnstone: Only Idiots Believe The CIA

This Russia-Afghanistan Story Is Western Propaganda At Its Most Vile

By Caitlin Johnstone

June 29, 2020 “Information Clearing House” – All western mass media outlets are now shrieking about the story The New York Times first reported, citing zero evidence and naming zero sources, claiming intelligence says Russia paid out bounties to Taliban-linked fighters in Afghanistan for attacking the occupying forces of the US and its allies in Afghanistan. As of this writing, and probably forevermore, there have still been zero intelligence sources named and zero evidence provided for this claim.

As we discussed yesterday, the only correct response to unsubstantiated claims by anonymous spooks in a post-Iraq invasion world is to assume that they are lying until you’ve been provided with a mountain of hard, independently verifiable evidence to the contrary. The fact that The New York Times instead chose to uncritically parrot these evidence-free claims made by operatives within intelligence agencies with a known track record of lying about exactly these things is nothing short of journalistic malpractice. The fact that western media outlets are now unanimously regurgitating these still 100 percent baseless assertions is nothing short of state propaganda.

The consensus-manufacturing, Overton window-shrinking western propaganda apparatus has been in full swing with mass media outlets claiming on literally no basis whatsoever that they have confirmed one another’s “great reporting” on this completely unsubstantiated story.

“The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post have confirmed our reporting,” the NYT story’s co-author Charlie Savage tweeted hours ago.

“We have confirmed the New York Times’ scoop: A Russian military spy unit offered bounties to Taliban-linked militants to attack coalition forces in Afghanistan,” tweeted The Washington Post‘s John Hudson.

“We matched The New York Times’ great reporting on how US intel has assessed that Russians paid Taliban to target US, coalition forces in Afg which is a pretty stunning development,” tweeted Wall Street Journal’s Gordon Lubold.

All three of these men are lying.

Are You Tired Of The Lies And Non-Stop Propaganda?

Get Your FREE Daily Newsletter

No Advertising – No Government Grants – This Is Independent Media

John Hudson’s claim that the Washington Post article he co-authored “confirmed the New York Times’ scoop” twice uses the words “if confirmed” with regard to his central claim, saying “Russian involvement in operations targeting Americans, if confirmed,” and “The attempt to stoke violence against Americans, if confirmed“. This is of course an acknowledgement that these things have not, in fact, been confirmed.

The Wall Street Journal article co-authored by Gordon Lubold cites only anonymous “people”, who we have no reason to believe are different people than NYT’s sources, repeating the same unsubstantiated assertions about an intelligence report. The article cites no evidence that Lubold’s “stunning development” actually occurred beyond “people familiar with the report said” and “a person familiar with it said“.

The fact that both Hudson and Lubold were lying about having confirmed the New York Times‘ reporting means that Savage was also lying when he said they did. When they say the report has been “confirmed”, what they really mean is that it has been agreed upon. All the three of them actually did was use their profoundly influential outlets to uncritically parrot something nameless spooks want the public to believe, which is the same as just publishing a CIA press release free of charge. It is unprincipled stenography for opaque and unaccountable intelligence agencies, and it is disgusting.

None of this should be happening. The New York Times has admitted itself that it was wrong for uncritically parroting the unsubstantiated spook claims which led to the Iraq invasion, as has The Washington Post. There is no reason to believe Taliban fighters would require any bounty to attack an illegitimate occupying force. The Russian government has denied these allegations. The Taliban has denied these allegations. The Trump administration has denied that the president or the vice president had any knowledge of the spook report in question, denouncing the central allegation that liberals who are promoting this story have been fixated on.

Yet this story is being magically transmuted into an established fact, despite its being based on literally zero factual evidence.

Outlets like CNN are running the story with the headline “Russia offered bounties to Afghan militants to kill US troops“, deceitfully presenting this as a verified fact. Such dishonest headlines are joined by UK outlets like The Guardian who informs headline-skimmers that “Russia offered bounty to kill UK soldiers“, and the Murdoch-owned Sky News which went with “Russia paid Taliban fighters to attack British troops in Afghanistan” after “confirming” the story with anonymous British spooks.

Western propagandists are turning this completely empty story into the mainstream consensus, not with facts, not with evidence, and certainly not with journalism, but with sheer brute force of narrative control. And now you’ve got Joe Biden once again attacking Trump for being insufficiently warlike, this time because “he failed to sanction or impose any kind of consequences on Russia for this egregious violation of international law”.

You’ve also got former George W Bush lackey Richard Haas promoting “a proportionate response” to these baseless allegations.

“Russia is carrying out covert wars vs US troops in Afghanistan and our democracy here at home,” Haas tweeted with a link to the New York Times story. “A proportionate response would increase the costs to Russia of its military presence in Ukraine and Syria and, using sanctions and cyber, to challenge Putin at home.”

Haas is the president of the Council on Foreign Relations, a wildly influential think tank with its fingers in most major US news outlets.

And indeed, the unified campaign to shove this story down people’s throats in stark defiance of everything one learns in journalism school does appear to be geared toward advancing pre-existing foreign policy agendas which have nothing to do with any concern for the safety of US troops. Analysts have pointed out that this new development arises just in time to sabotage the last of the nuclear treaties between the US and Russia, the scaling down of US military presence in Afghanistan, and, as Haas already openly admitted, any possibility of peace in Syria.

“This story is published just in time to sabotage US-Russia arms control talks,” Antiwar‘s Dave DeCamp noted on Twitter. “As the US is preparing for a new arms race — and possibly even live nuclear tests — the New York Times provides a great excuse to let the New START lapse, making the world a much more dangerous place. Russiagate has provided the cover for Trump to pull out of arms control agreements. First the INF, then the Open Skies, and now possibly the New START. Any talks or negotiations with Russia are discouraged in this atmosphere, and this Times story will make things even worse.”

“US ‘intelligence’ agencies (ie, organized crime networks run by the state) want to sabotage the (admittedly very inadequate) peace talks in Afghanistan,” tweeted journalist Ben Norton. “So they get best of both worlds: blame the Russian bogeyman, fueling the new cold war, while prolonging the military occupation. It’s not a coincidence these dubious Western intelligence agency claims about Russia came just days after a breakthrough in peace talks. Afghanistan’s geostrategic location (and trillions worth of minerals) is too important to them.”

All parties involved in spreading this malignant psyop are absolutely vile, but a special disdain should be reserved for the media class who have been entrusted by the public with the essential task of creating an informed populace and holding power to account. How much of an unprincipled whore do you have to be to call yourself a journalist and uncritically parrot the completely unsubstantiated assertions of spooks while protecting their anonymity? How much work did these empire fluffers put into killing off every last shred of their dignity? It boggles the mind.

It really is funny how the most influential news outlets in the western world will uncritically parrot whatever they’re told to say by the most powerful and depraved intelligence agencies on the planet, and then turn around and tell you without a hint of self-awareness that Russia and China are bad because they have state media.

Sometimes all you can do is laugh.

Caitlin’s articles are entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking her on Facebook, following her antics on Twitter, checking out her podcast, throwing some money into her hat on Patreon or Paypalor buying her book Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.


Can’t wait Lada, great work!

Futurist Trendcast


The finalized title for Earth Shift Webinar 14:

     Period 9 Shift & the Dawn of the Age of Aquarius: 


      How Neptune, Saturn & Period 9 Shift Will Change Everything

ESW14 RELEASE: JULY 1-2 (Tues-Wed)!


You will be able to buy this webinar starting on the day of its release and any time thereafter!

This webinar will focus on the multidimensional, metaphysical and esoteric catalysts of the Earth Shift. And it will focus on something highly requested by my clients: THE TIMING OF CHANGES! 

My new and updated predictionswill give you specific timing of what’s to come in the next 5-6 years and more, to help you plan your life!

We are in the period of an extreme Shift, the dawn of the Aquarian Age and the time of advanced 4D & 5D souls’…

View original post 136 more words

♫ What A Wonderful World ♫ (Redux)

Just wonderful, Jill ur on a hot streak, please keep ’em coming! ❤

Filosofa's Word

I was in the mood for a song with a positive spin tonight, and I came across this.  I played this before … March 2019 … but to me, it is worth hearing again.

I was probably around ten years old when I saw Louis Armstrong in person.  I remember being agog at how big he could make his cheeks when playing the trumpet!  I also fell in love with his gravelly voice and the look of kindness in his eyes.  Ever since, I have been a Louis Armstrong fan.

I just finished writing a post about the slaughter of beautiful animals, and was feeling the need for a song about appreciating the beauty around us.  This song is just that.

Although Louis Armstrong was mainly a jazz musician, this song is the one most often associated with him.  Though it was first released in 1967, it didn’t become a…

View original post 222 more words

BLM and the Neoliberal Color Revolution in America

Last Updated on 

neoliberal color revolution

BLM is part of the Neoliberal Color Revolution in America, funded by the CIA. Neoliberal Democrats are exploiting BLM to get Biden elected.

BLM is part of the Neoliberal Color Revolution

in America. “The protests, riots, violent and non-violent actions sweeping across the United States since May 25, including an assault on the gates of the White House, begin to make sense when we understand the CIA’s Color Revolution playbook,” writes economic researcher, historian, and freelance journalist F. William Engdahl.

Engdahl then breaks down the connections between Black Lives Matter, socialist organizations, George Soros’ Open Society Foundations, the Ford Foundation (as previously noted, a CIA front organization), the Foundation to Promote Open Society, Borealis Philanthropy, the Kellogg Foundation, Ben & Jerry’s Foundation, and the Heinz Foundation (John Kerry).

“Following the murder of George Floyd, “major corporations such as Apple, Disney, Nike and hundreds others may be pouring untold and unaccounted millions into ActBlue under the name of Black Lives Matter, funds that in fact can go to fund the election of a Democrat President Biden.””

BLM is part of the Movement for Black Lives Coalition (M4BL), a cutout created by the Ford Foundation, in other words, the CIA. It has called for “defunding police departments, race-based reparations, voting rights for illegal immigrants, fossil-fuel divestment, an end to private education and charter schools, a universal basic income, and free college for blacks,” according to its website.

As Engdahl points out, M4BL and BLM are Democrat-dominated operations. They receive money from ActBlue Charities, a “progressive” organization in support of the Joe Biden campaign. “ActBlue is a pass-through organization and service for donations to left-of-center nonprofits and PACs,” notes InfluenceWatch. B4BL takes money from Google (also linked to the CIA)  and a host of labor unions, including the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, and the AFL-CIO Committee on Political Education.

An article posted back in 2009 by Human Events states that despite “its stripped-down appearance, ActBlue is frothing with the elitist pretension characteristic of the modern Left. The hip tenets of ‘grassroots’ campaigning, highbrow blathering and self-possessed pseudo-coolness seep through the slogans, descriptions and thematics of the [ActBlue] website.”

As Engdahl points out, the “role of tax-exempt foundations tied to the fortunes of the greatest industrial and financial companies such as Rockefeller, Ford, Kellogg, Hewlett and Soros says that there is a far deeper and far more sinister agenda to current disturbances than spontaneous outrage would suggest.”

The founders of BLM admit to being Marxist revolutionaries determined to destroy capitalism (no longer recognizable as such).

“The policy platform proposed by BLM in August [2016]… calls for collective ownership of resources, banks, and businesses, a highly progressive income tax, a guaranteed minimum income, and government jobs are lifted straight from the pages of Karl Marx’s ‘Communist Manifesto,’” writes Thurston Powers. “BLM has simply substituted Marx’s class conflict between the proletariat and bourgeoisie for class conflict between blackness and whiteness.”

The black vs. white dichotomy creates a permanent enemy class, to which defection is always incomplete. And unlike the proletariat class consciousness, race consciousness already exists, making mobilization easier. This can be seen in the comments of a Milwaukee protester from August: “We do not want justice or peace anymore. We done with that shit. We want blood. We want blood. We want the same shit ya’ll want. Eye for an eye. No more peace. F–k all that. Ain’t no more peace. Ain’t no more peace. We done. We cannot cohabitate with white people, one of us have to go, black or white. All ya’ll have to go!”

It is nonsensical to believe the transnational corporations and banks now funding BLM buy into the Marxist rhetoric and objectives of BLM—that is to say, they are not supporting their very own destruction as evil capitalist enterprises.

BLM and its Marxist leaders will be jettisoned after Biden wins the election. Either BLM will conform to the democrat masquerade—a kinder and gentler face plastered on the neoliberal project—or it will become irrelevant to national one-party politics pushed on the American people by a corporate propaganda media.

After a Biden victory, BLM will be expected to head for the bleachers where they will be required to cheerlead “diversity,” which is basically yet another ruling elite control mechanism.

Instead, they will go to the streets.

What You Need to Know about Chlorine Dioxide

The information contained in this booklet is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as health advice on any subject matter. We make no claims to any therapeutic or healing effects of sodium chlorite or any of its derivatives (MMS, CDS, ClO2). We do not endorse nor are liable for any of the information or for the appearance of the word “recommended” in all of its forms, which refer only to the recommendations found online by other people. We here do not promote, recommend or endorse that anyone take any products mentioned or inferred, in any amount, way, shape or form. We do not sell or profit from the sale of any of these products. In the case of any of the links provided leading directly or indirectly to a supplier of sodium chlorite or any other products, this is purely coincidental, we have no relationship to any of them and we do not recommend or endorse the purchase or usage of products found on these sites. Read and use the information contained in this booklet solely under your own responsibility. We here have only put together information from several resources found elsewhere on the web, and are not liable for its validity, nor any actions or consequences resulting from said actions by individuals or groups of individuals after the use or misuse of any of the information here contained.

What is MMS?
Many people have heard of this by the name MMS. First of all, we must make very clear the fact that MMS (Master Mineral Solution or Miracle Mineral Supplement), as the name given by Jim Humble to one of the main products discussed in this document (sodium chlorite mixed with an activator acid), has been labeled as illegal for sale and promotion by many countries and we do not endorse its purchase or consumption.
However, the compound to which MMS refers, sodium chlorite mixed with an activator acid, has been approved and even mandated for use in several countries including the United States and Europe under the name ASC (Acidified Sodium Chlorite) for the purposes of disinfecting foods and water for human consumption, and in some countries also for the disinfection of blood kept in blood banks for the purpose of transfusions.
What are Sodium Chlorite and Chlorine Dioxide?
The main focus of this document will be Chlorine Dioxide (ClO2), also known as the “ideal biocide”. Chlorine dioxide is one of the best-known disinfectants. It kills most viruses, bacteria, fungi and small parasites in a wide range of conditions, without creating any toxic byproducts. It is the preferred substance to disinfect drinking water in Germany and other developed countries, over other substances such as chlorine which are toxic (though some countries still use chlorine in their water).
Where does sodium chlorite (NaClO2) fit into the picture? Because ClO2 is a gas and not easily transported, it has been found much more convenient to transport and sell precursors such as NaClO2 in the form of flakes or powder, and generate ClO2 from them on site, when needed.
When mixing sodium chlorite with an acid (also known as an activator) the gas ClO2 is released.
Typically, citric acid has been used in industry and clinical settings. However, it has been found
that hydrochloric acid (HCl) is a much better activator for oral intake, as citric acid can create
discomfort in many people.
ClO2 works as an oxidant. An oxidant is simply a substance or element that takes electrons from
other elements. Other well-known oxidants are O2 (oxygen), O3 (ozone) and H2O2 (hydrogen
peroxide). Some of these are already used in therapeutic settings, such as ozone therapy,
however they can cause damage to healthy cells and body tissue, where ClO2 does not.
One reason ClO2 is preferred over other oxidizing agents when it comes to applications to human
health, is that ClO2 has a lower oxidation potential (also called oxidation strength) than the other
oxidants mentioned in the paragraph before.
Oxidation potential is, simply put, a measure of how strongly an oxidant is trying to take electrons
from the environment. In practice, this means that ClO2 isn’t strong enough to take electrons
from healthy human cells, thus leaving them unaffected, while being strong enough to affect
smaller pathogens such as viruses and bacteria.
While ozone or hydrogen peroxide will harm healthy cells in the body and get quickly used up,
ClO2 will only affect harmful pathogens, thus lasting longer and being able to reach much more
deeply into the body.
On top of that, ClO2 has a higher oxidation capacity than the other oxidants mentioned. This
means that one molecule of ClO2 can take more electrons (in this case 5 electrons) than all the
other oxidants listed above such as O3 (all of them coming at only 2 electrons). In practice, this
means that a molecule of ClO2 can oxidize more pathogens before being used up. All of these
qualities truly make ClO2 the ideal killer of viruses, bacteria, fungi and other pathogens.
At room temperature, ClO2 is a gas that very easily dissolves in water (it dissolves best in cold
water under 11 ºC and at this temperature it will stay good for many months in the fridge, inside
a closed container). When taken orally at the recommended doses, it will easily be absorbed into
the bloodstream and work as a separate carrier of oxygen to red blood cells, effectively increasing
the oxygenation of the blood – many report feeling a rush of energy after ingesting ClO2. Much
like red blood cells, ClO2 acts under the Bohr effect and will release its oxygen in areas of higher
acidity such as those with viruses, harmful bacteria, inflammation or infection. It also works to
neutralize lactic acid in blood and muscles.
Due to these properties, some professional athletes have used chlorine dioxide to legally enhance
their performance and speed the recovery from workouts and competition.
Once ClO2 has acted it leaves only water (H2O2) and minute amounts of salt (NaCl). The amount
of salt left is so small, it hasn’t been shown to have any effect with people on low salt diets.
Despite ClO2 being a bactericidal, no negative effects have been observed or reported in the
health of the gut flora, even by people who have been taking it regularly for years. As to the exact
reason why this is, more research in the area is necessary.
Due to the capacity of chlorine dioxide to kill pathogens without harming the body’s cells, it has
been used for decades as a preferred method to disinfect blood stored for blood transfusions in
several countries. When gathering and mixing blood from donors, there is always the risk of
contamination by viruses and bacteria, which caused a lot of controversy in the 1980s and 90s
with the AIDS scare.
Enter international patent PCT/US87/00288 filed in 1987, which describes a method by which
red blood cells infected by HTLV-III are safely disinfected using a solution that contains sodium
chlorite and lactic acid as the activator – HTLV-III was the name originally given to the virus
causing AIDS. It was later decided to rename the virus to HIV. In other words, thanks to the use
of ClO2, blood can be cleaned of viruses including HIV, without any harm to the red blood cells,
and then be safely used for transfusions.
Also, the company Alcide filed patent US5019402A in 1991 for the use of sodium chlorite with
lactic acid for the disinfection of blood from donors, after concerns of HIV contamination. Since
1994, these methods are of mandatory use in several countries worldwide for the disinfection of
blood from donors for the purpose of transfusions.
As a side note, and as anecdotal evidence, many people with HIV have reported using chlorine
dioxide (ClO2) orally to relieve themselves of their symptoms and rid their bodies of the HIV virus
in no more than 3 weeks’ time. I stress that this evidence is purely anecdotal and more serious
research in the area is highly encouraged.
What about Viruses and the Fight against Coronavirus?
The way ClO2 acts to destroy viruses is different than it is for bacteria. In a crude way, in bacteria
it works by oxidizing and destroying their outer membranes. In viruses it works through
denaturalization. In either case, unlike with antibiotics, no virus or bacteria can ever develop a
resistance or immunity to oxidization by ClO2 (and indeed they haven’t in over 100 years of use
for disinfection).
In a virus, ClO2 will act by destroying the capsid, which is the protein shell of a virus.
Subsequently, it will destroy the virus’ genetic material, thus rendering it sterile and incapable of
infecting any cell or other organism. Exposure to ClO2 of up to a few days may be necessary for
the complete elimination of certain viruses.
ClO2 has long been known to be efficient against the virus SARS-CoV-2, which is the basis of the
current coronavirus COVID-19, even in low concentrations. It has also been shown to be efficient
against different strains of Coronavirus that affect humans and animals. One could assume that
it is also efficient against the current coronavirus affecting most of the world, however it is best
to do studies to confirm this hypothesis and indeed such studies are currently underway.
Preliminary results of current clinical trials and anecdotal evidence have shown that ClO2 kills the
coronavirus in infected people within 48 hours, leading to a full recovery without side effects.
We are waiting for these studies to conclude and be published as soon as possible. In the
meantime, from all the scientific evidence plus anecdotal evidence that we have, it would seem
that ClO2 is an extremely safe and efficient way to eradicate the current coronavirus pandemic.
If nothing else, it would appear to be much safer than other currently used methods to fight
coronavirus, such as the ever more popular malaria drug Hydroxychloroquine. This drug has now
been approved by the FDA in the US to treat coronavirus, however it is highly toxic and can have
severe side effects which include, but are not limited to, changes in vision, inability to move your
eyes, deafness, feelings of paranoia, seizures, difficulty breathing, loss of consciousness and fatal
cardiac failure (death).
On the other hand, ClO2 seems just as effective if not more in the treatment of coronavirus while
being of very low toxicity and having only rare side effects of nausea and diarrhea, which quickly
pass, when taken in the recommended doses. More on its toxicity in the next section.
Toxicity and Safety Concerns
Anything can be toxic. Even water. It all depends on the means of intake and the dosage. For
instance, one cannot intake water through the lungs, it is toxic. But a fish can. Drinking 6 liters of
water at once could also kill you.
Just like water, chlorine dioxide (ClO2) is toxic if breathed in large amounts. Inhaling small
amounts of the gas won’t cause any harm, but it is best to take precautions and not breathe the
gas directly. How about oral intake toxicity of ClO2?
The WHO (World Health Organization) established in 2007 the safe levels of ASC intake. ASC is
Acidified Sodium Chlorite. This is the same as chlorine dioxide. ASC is used both in North America
and Europe to treat all products meant for human consumption: fruits, vegetables, meats,
bottled water, etc. Thus, the WHO established what levels of ASC are safe for human intake as
residues of it may be left in foods and water usually taken by people.
The 68th Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives concluded in 2007 that 0.03 mg/kg
(that’s per kg of body weight of the person) of sodium chlorite are safe for consumption by people
of all groups and ages, per day, every day of a person’s life. On the other hand, the highest
recommended daily dose of chlorine dioxide for therapeutic purposes is 0.005 mg/kg (equivalent
for an adult to 30 drops of sodium chlorite mixed with an activator). This is 6 times lower than
the levels deemed safe by the WHO. What medication do you know of, which you could take 6
times the highest recommended dose, every day for your entire life, and not suffer any harmful
For the gas chlorine dioxide, oral toxicity is even lower than for sodium chlorite, the LD50 (“lethal
dose” for 50% of subjects) being established at 292mg/kg daily for 14 days. For an adult human
person, this is hundreds of times higher than the highest recommended dose, and would require
drinking 5 to 10 liters of the concentrated CDS (at 3000ppm) every day for 2 weeks. A feat nearing
the impossible.
However low the toxicity of sodium chlorite, it is best that people activate it with HCL rather than
citric acid as already mentioned earlier. Citric acid has been reported to cause discomfort in the
form of nausea and diarrhea in many people.
The best form of sodium chlorite for human intake, in terms of taste and acceptance by the
human body, is pure ClO2 gas dissolved in water with no traces of NaClO2 or the activator acid
in the water. This is known as CDS or Chlorine Dioxide Solution. A video showing how to prepare
CDS can be seen by following a link included in the last section “Closing Thoughts”.
As of this writing, three different patents for CDS already exist and were developed by Andreas
Kalcker working at a Swiss research institute. It is our understanding that more patents are being
developed but apologize if any of these claims are inaccurate.
No cases have ever been reported in the scientific literature of death from the oral consumption
of sodium chlorite diluted in water. In contrast, aspirin kills more than 3,000 people every year.
Neither sodium chlorite, nor ClO2, MMS, or CDS are bleach. Sodium chlorite is NaClO2. Bleach is
NaClO. Bleach is toxic in any amount, besides being about 10 times less efficient as a disinfectant.
If you think one oxygen atom doesn’t make a lot of difference to the toxicological properties of a
molecule, you may consider that drinking water (H2O) is a very different matter than drinking
hydrogen peroxide (H2O2).
Yes, chlorine dioxide is sometimes used in the industry for the bleaching of paper – but it is used
in concentrations tens of thousands of times higher than those taken orally by people, and in the
industry, it is used together with large amounts of other, strong oxidizing agents.
Why Isn’t Chlorine Dioxide Known and Used by Doctors Everywhere?
It is our opinion, and I really stress that this is just an opinion, that the reason is basically one of
profit. Sodium chlorite is an extremely cheap substance. In order for it, or for chlorine dioxide, to
be approved for medical use in many diseases, tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars would
have to be spent in research and certifications.
If a pharmaceutical company were to spend all that money, they would not be able to make even
a fraction of it back in sales, due to how cheaply people would be able to obtain it elsewhere. In
fact, it is estimated that ClO2 would make over 4,000 currently approved medications obsolete,
costing the different pharmaceutical companies billions of dollars.
We would also like to note that the goals of the pharmaceutical industry are to make a profit,
and not necessarily to find a cure for various diseases. Again, this is just an opinion based on the
observation that when symptoms can be simply chronically managed, and a person made to
depend on a certain medication for the rest of their life, it is a much more profitable endeavor
than permanently healing the person of the disease. The first is a lifelong customer, while the
latter is a lost client.
Several doctors do use ClO2 with patients in different settings and some of these have already
sent reports of their case studies to governmental agencies. It is our understanding that these
governments have turned the evidence down and refuse to even give ClO2 a try. Thankfully,
bigger clinical trials are currently underway in several countries with very promising results of full
recoveries without side effects in less than 48 hours.
Closing Thoughts
ClO2 at present offers a great hope in the current pandemic situation. From all evidence and
testimonials so far gathered, it could present a safe and quick way to eradicate the coronavirus
pandemic in a very short time, thus helping to avoid great loss of life and the destruction of world
Though we have mentioned only a handful of patents and approved uses of both sodium chlorite
and chlorine dioxide, the list is much longer. Many more patents exist, for example both in China
and the United States for the treatment of tumors and cancer. There are many other patents for
other uses and in many other products. Anecdotally, many thousands of people have reported
full recovery of almost any disease of viral or bacterial origin, as well as diseases to do with the
immune system and inflammation, such as multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (well
known for having afflicted famous physicist Stephen Hawking), rheumatoid arthritis, etc. We do
not here in any way say that ClO2 can heal any of these conditions, we are only passing on what
other people have reportedly claimed to have recovered from by the use of ClO2.
In closing, we would like to remind any medical professional reading this that, although they must
abide by the laws laid out by their respective countries, the World Medical Association, as per
the Declaration of Helsinki, has established that unproven treatments may be used when no
other treatments exist or have proven ineffective:
“In the treatment of an individual patient, where proven interventions do not exist or other
known interventions have been ineffective, the physician, after seeking expert advice, with
informed consent from the patient or a legally authorised representative, may use an unproven
intervention if in the physician’s judgement it offers hope of saving life, re-establishing health or
alleviating suffering. This intervention should subsequently be made the object of research,
designed to evaluate its safety and efficacy. In all cases, new information must be recorded and,
where appropriate, made publicly available.”
It is beyond the intent and scope of this document to explain the many different ways in which
chlorine dioxide can be used. To learn more about how people use it, refer to Jim’s protocols
(which can be read about here that use sodium
chlorite activated with an acid (it is recommended to use HCl at 4% rather than citric acid at 50%
for best tolerance and results). Alternatively, learn the different ways to use CDS from Andreas
Kalcker’s protocols here (the link includes a video
from Andreas on the preparation of CDS).
To Your Health,
Andreas Kalcker – Dióxido de Cloro ¿Veneno o Medicina? I Congreso Salud Censurada
Video “Teresa Forcades – ClO2 Seguro e Inofensivo 2018” which has since been removed by
The many video lectures, conferences and interviews of Andreas Kalcker and of MMS found on
YouTube, though a great number of big channels and videos on the subject have been removed
by YouTube the last few days